1 Mar 01:09
Relator terms for graphic and rare material
We passed on the Autocat question about relator terms for editors to our client the Folger Shakespeare Library, for whom we catalogue graphic material, using 100/600/700 $e. Dr. Erin Blake passes on this very informative message: =================================================================== We display $e in the browse list for 100 and 700, and we WANT to display it for 600, but our ILS (Voyager) doesn't provide that option yet. We've submitted an "enhancement request" and keep pestering them about it. You'd think that if a valid MARC code for public display *doesn't* display it would be a bug-report rather than an enhancement-request, but that line of reasoning hasn't worked. Rare book libraries routinely use relator terms with 1xx/7xx headings (using "$e depicted" in the 6xx is still unusual, though). See http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocab ularies/relators/alphabetical_list.htm for "Relator Terms for Use in Rare Book and Special Collections Cataloging". Relator terms (and indexing problems) were discussed at the 2007 ALA Midwinter MARC for Special Collections Discussion Group. Here's an excerpt from the minutes: "Our second topic centered on the recording and use of provenance information in catalog records. We discussed the potential for patron confusion in systems where all headings for an author are indexed together, regardless of relator terms or codes, making it difficult to distinguish (for instance) between books written by an author, and books owned by that author. Yale avoids the problem by tracing provenance in(Continue reading)
RSS Feed