1 Feb 2008 01:13
Re: WDSCI-L Digest, Vol 6, Issue 54
On 31-Jan-08, at 5:49 PM, wdsci-l-request@... wrote: > But Jon, didn't it seem that the idea was to allow you to migrate from > ADTS to RDi? So in effect, you *are* gettig RDi entitlements, you > just > aren't getting entitled to BOTH. I think that may have been what we wanted to hear Joe, but it wasn't what was on the charts. When they presented the new packaging to the Toronto User Group yesterday they _very_ explicitly stated that there was ZERO entitlement to RDi. They were asked again and reiterated that there was no RDi entitlement. There was a lot of dark muttering at that point. The entitlement is to WDSC (not sure about user limits) and they get a tiered number of users for ADTS. The charts are supposed to be going up on the TUG web site soon - as soon as they appear I'll post here. Jon Paris www.Partner400.com www.SystemiDeveloper.com -- -- This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message email: WDSCI-L@...(Continue reading)
We are screwed
I won't really know how "easy" EGL is
until I get into a real application scenario, which I may have one coming
down the pipe right now.
Couple of questions to anyone that can answer them:
- Is the generated Java code compliant to all the different specs out there
(i.e. J2EE) and are there any IBM runtime jars (or other files) that are
required? So theoretically I could run my EGL (read generated Java) on any
Tomcat server?
- Is it possible to compile the EGL code into Java without RBDe? Just
thinking through IBM's history of dropping technologies and wondering if
they ended up dropping EGL if the community could (or would be able to)
facilitate the continuation of the product.
Aaron Bartell
RSS Feed