Re: RE: compiling nano on HP-UX

Oh, well that's great news either way.  I have added the old gcc workaround
to subversion in r4387 and credited you as the reporter.
 Thanks much for the report!

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jay <jay.krell <at> cornell.edu> wrote:
> Chris, thanks, yes, this fixes it. (This is really more for the sake of
> future folks, I was ok either way.)
> I also found -- sorry, didn't realize this till today -- that current gcc
> (4.3.3 release) also predefines _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED. Older does not
> though, e.g. 3.4.6.
> I built with both -- with 4.3.3 you didn't define it, built ok, 3.4.6 you
> did define it, built ok.
>
>  - Jay
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: jay.krell <at> cornell.edu
> To: chrisa <at> asty.org
> CC: help-nano <at> gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:09:19 +0000
>
> oops, sorry, no, I will, later..
>
>  - Jay
>
>
>> Subject: Re: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX
>> From: chrisa <at> asty.org