[patch] Make mouse wheel work with xforms again.

This makes the mose wheel work on XForms again.

Wheel handling is now done the same way in XForms as in QT. (or very
similar.)

--

-- 
	Lgb

Re: Computer algebra in LyX

Jan Peters wrote:

>Hi there!
>
>I am still switching forth and back between scientific workplace
>(running on virtual PC with WindowsNT 4 on my Mac :(, and under
>Crossover Office on my Linux box) and LyX. Obviously, that is a very
>undesirable state, but I am still missing many things in LyX which my
>daily life as a Ph.D. student depends on.
>Therefore, I would like to help making the LyX community aware of
>features, ideas, recommendations, etc - but also of mistakes & catches
>which it should avoid. In order to avoid redundancies with the
>achivements in LyX 1.4, I would like to wait for its release date.
>Can anyboday tell me when will LyX 1.4 be available? Is there any
>estimated release date yet? Is there maybe a beta version (preferably
>for Mac OS X) which I can download without too much hassle? My main
>point in this review would obviously be from a users perspective :).
>
>One of the main problems in a comparison between LyX and Scientific
>Workplace is that LyX does not (yet?) support computer algebra. Has
>anybody ever worked on integrating computer algebra into LyX?  Or
>would it be "straight-forward" to integrate at least an elementary
>connection to Maxima or another open source computer algebra engine?
>You might say: use TexMacs - and I say NO! Texmacs went the wrong way,
>it requires you to code equations in Maxima. What we need is an
>elementary functions which converts, and maxima code to LyX/Latex. Let
>me demonstrate two examples:
>1. Evaluate: We have an equation \int \frac{1}{x} dx and want to evaluate it.
>Convert LyX/Latex-Equations "\int \frac{1}{x} dx"  to  Maxima Code
>"integrate(1/x,x)"

Re: lyx-devel src/: LaTeXFeatures.C ChangeLog

>>>>> "spitz" == spitz  <spitz@...> writes:

spitz> CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot Module name: lyx-devel
spitz> Repository: lyx-devel/src/ Changes by: spitz@...
spitz> 04/07/23 18:03:41

spitz> Modified files: lyx-devel/src/: LaTeXFeatures.C ChangeLog

spitz> Log message: check for jurabib version

I see:

+	if (isRequired("jurabib")) {
+		packages << "\\RequirePackage{jurabib}[2004/01/25]\n";
+	}

Juergen, why don't you use 
  \usepackage{jurabib}[2004/01/25]
directly?

RequirePackage is not supposed to be used in documents, only
packages/classes (although I am not sure what the difference is).

JMarc

Re: lyx-devel src/: LaTeXFeatures.C ChangeLog

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen, why don't you use
>   \usepackage{jurabib}[2004/01/25]
> directly?

AFAIK \usepackage does not provide the release date argument. At least it does 
not do anything at all if I use it with a newer release date, while 
\ProvidePackage spits out a warning.

> RequirePackage is not supposed to be used in documents, only
> packages/classes (although I am not sure what the difference is).

I know. I think the difference is that \usepackage contains an extra error 
checking. If \usepackage is used before the \documentclass or after the
\begin{document}, LaTeX spits out an error message.  Between
\documentclass and \begin{document}, \usepackage is let-bound
to \RequirePackage (i.e., the two are equivalent). So for our use, there is no 
problem using \RequirePackage.

Jürgen.

Re: lyx-devel src/: LaTeXFeatures.C ChangeLog

>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <juergen.sp@...> writes:

Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Juergen, why don't you use   \usepackage{jurabib}[2004/01/25]
>> directly?

Juergen> AFAIK \usepackage does not provide the release date argument.
Juergen> At least it does not do anything at all if I use it with a
Juergen> newer release date, while \ProvidePackage spits out a
Juergen> warning.

It is documented in usrguide.dvi, though. And the following test:

  \documentclass{article}
  \usepackage{amsmath}[2005/01/01]
  \begin{document}

  Hello.

  \end{document}

yields on console:

  LaTeX Warning: You have requested, on input line 2, version
                 `2005/01/01' of package amsmath,
                 but only version
                 `2000/07/18 v2.13 AMS math features'
                 is available.

So, what's the problem?

Re: lyx-devel src/: LaTeXFeatures.C ChangeLog

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> So, what's the problem?

The problem seems to reside lefthand and righthand of my nose.
I'll correct that.

Jürgen

Re: lyx-devel src/: LaTeXFeatures.C ChangeLog

>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <juergen.sp@...> writes:

Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> So, what's the problem?

Juergen> The problem seems to reside lefthand and righthand of my
Juergen> nose. I'll correct that.

Thanks.

JMarc

Re: iso-8859-13

On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:33:03PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:

> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <martin.vermeer@...> writes:
> 
> Martin> Trying again. Ah, that's better. I have to press the 'attach'
> Martin> button...
>  
> >> is latin-7 the same as iso-8859-13?
> 
> I see that the patch has been applied, but the following line seems
> suspicious to me:
> 
> +icelandic   icelandic   "Icelandic"     false  iso8859-1  "is_IS"  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}"
> 
> Isn't there a missing quote before the last parameter?
> 
> Also, why is the fontenc thing necessary?
> 
> JMarc

I see that nobody fixed the missing quote bug. It should be OK now
(although I am still not convinced the fontenc is necessary)

- Martin

Re: iso-8859-13

>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <martin.vermeer@...> writes:

Martin> I see that nobody fixed the missing quote bug. It should be OK
Martin> now (although I am still not convinced the fontenc is
Martin> necessary)

I would just remove it, and wait until someone complains. What do you
think of that?

JMarc

Re: iso-8859-13

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 04:56:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:

> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <martin.vermeer@...> writes:
> 
> Martin> I see that nobody fixed the missing quote bug. It should be OK
> Martin> now (although I am still not convinced the fontenc is
> Martin> necessary)
> 
> I would just remove it, and wait until someone complains. What do you
> think of that?
> 
> JMarc

Hmmm, Logi would know. Let's give him time to respond first.

- Martin