headers
SourceForge.net | 1 Jul 2004 16:24
Picon
Favicon

[ jedit-Bugs-983459 ] new abbrevs expand to "?"

Bugs item #983459, was opened at 2004-07-01 09:24
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=983459&group_id=588

Category: editor core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ollie Rutherfurd (orutherfurd)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: new abbrevs expand to "?"

Initial Comment:
New abbrevs: alpha, beta, gamma, etc... all expand to "?".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=983459&group_id=588

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
--

-- 
-----------------------------------------------
jEdit Developers' List
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 1 Jul 2004 19:08
Picon
Favicon

[ jedit-Bugs-983542 ] reloading a new buffer results in FileNotFoundException

Bugs item #983542, was opened at 2004-07-01 12:08
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=983542&group_id=588

Category: editor core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brant Langer Gurganus (brantgurga)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: reloading a new buffer results in FileNotFoundException

Initial Comment:
When a new untouched buffer is open and the reload
option is used, a FileNotFoundException occurs.

Steps:
1. Create a new buffer.
2. Switch to that buffer.
3. Click File > Reload.

Actual Results:
FileNotFoundException

Expected:
No Exception is seen by user.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 2 Jul 2004 00:49
Picon
Favicon

[ jedit-Bugs-983754 ] SideKick file error

Bugs item #983754, was opened at 2004-07-01 17:49
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=983754&group_id=588

Category: plugin API
Group: severe bug
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brad Miller (bnmnetp)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: SideKick file error

Initial Comment:
Python files are not parsed by Sidekick, which incorectly identifies 
a file not found error.... The file is visible in the buffer!

[message] Log: When reporting bugs, please include the following 
information:
[message] Log: java.version=1.4.2_04
[message] Log: java.vm.version=1.4.2-36
[message] Log: java.runtime.version=1.4.2_04-131
[message] Log: java.vendor=Apple Computer, Inc.
[message] Log: java.compiler=null
[message] Log: os.name=Mac OS X
[message] Log: os.version=10.3.4
[message] Log: os.arch=ppc
[message] Log: user.home=/Users/bmiller
[message] Log: java.home=/System/Library/Frameworks/
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SourceForge.net | 2 Jul 2004 10:22
Picon
Favicon

[ jedit-Plugin Central Submission-983937 ] PHPParserPlugin v1.0.2

Plugin Central Submission item #983937, was opened at 2004-07-02 10:22
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=983937&group_id=588

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: PHPParserPlugin v1.0.2

Initial Comment:
PHPParserplugin
version 1.0.2

Requires:
jEdit 4.2
ErrorListPlugin 1.3.2

Changes:
A lot of bugfixes in the parsing

Features:
The files named *.php will be parsed on each save.

Description
PHPParserPlugin is a php 4 parser that will highlight
your syntax errors
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Robert Fletcher | 2 Jul 2004 13:28
Picon
Favicon

gnu.regexp and lookbehind assertions

Sorry for the slightly OT question, but it is related to something I'm
trying to do with jEdit.

It seems like gnu.regexp doesn't support lookbehind assertions although
lookaheads work fine. Does anyone know of a workaround? What I'm trying
to do is replace < and > with &lt; and &gt; unless they are in the
construct <br>.

The right way would be to look for

(?<!<br)>

and

<(?!br>)

But while the 2nd of those works fine, the first throws REException.

Is there a way around this without re-processing the string. I really
don't want to get into special case handling if I can possibly avoid
it.

		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Paul Libbrecht | 2 Jul 2004 15:26

Width of fancy signs on Macs


Hi JEditters,

Can someone confirm me what I am having, currently with jEdit 
4.2pre-14, MacOSX 10.3.4 with the font Monaco as text-area font and the 
Metal l&f:
When I insert something like the following:
	$∀(ε, (ε<0 )⇒ ∃(ε, (ε<0 )⇒ P))$
I get all the signs (forall, epsilon, implies, exists...) but the width 
of the line is kind of crooked and the cursor and selection don't in 
sync with the characters.
(e.g. if I delete, it deletes something elsewhere!).

I wonder wether jEdit recomputes all the width independently of wether 
it's a proprotional font or not.

thanks

paul

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
--

-- 
-----------------------------------------------
jEdit Developers' List
jEdit-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Pete Prodoehl | 2 Jul 2004 17:24

Re: Width of fancy signs on Macs

Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Hi JEditters,
> 
> Can someone confirm me what I am having, currently with jEdit 4.2pre-14, 
> MacOSX 10.3.4 with the font Monaco as text-area font and the Metal l&f:
> When I insert something like the following:
>     $∀(ε, (ε<0 )⇒ ∃(ε, (ε<0 )⇒ P))$
> I get all the signs (forall, epsilon, implies, exists...) but the width 
> of the line is kind of crooked and the cursor and selection don't in 
> sync with the characters.
> (e.g. if I delete, it deletes something elsewhere!).
> 
> I wonder wether jEdit recomputes all the width independently of wether 
> it's a proprotional font or not.

Hmmm, I tried to replicate this, though I'm using jEdit 4.2pre12 on Mac
OS X 10.3.4...

I normally use the Mac OS X Look & Feel, and that worked fine. When I
switched to Metal I got boxes in place of the special characters. When I
switched back to Mac OS X L&F all was well again.

Does the Mac OS X L&F work ok for you?

Pete

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Alan Williamson | 2 Jul 2004 18:00
Favicon

License Question

I am developing a plugin for use within JEdit.

The plugin is for a debugger into a commercial piece of software.  The 
commercial piece of software is not open-source.

Therefore I ask the question; under the license terms of JEdit can we 
release this plugin?  Do plugins have to be under the GPL?

Has anyone hit this?

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
--

-- 
-----------------------------------------------
jEdit Developers' List
jEdit-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Brian Hawkins | 2 Jul 2004 18:30

Re: gnu.regexp and lookbehind assertions

The JDK 1.4 has a regex class in it.  have you tried it?

Brian

Robert Fletcher wrote:

>Sorry for the slightly OT question, but it is related to something I'm
>trying to do with jEdit.
>
>It seems like gnu.regexp doesn't support lookbehind assertions although
>lookaheads work fine. Does anyone know of a workaround? What I'm trying
>to do is replace < and > with &lt; and &gt; unless they are in the
>construct <br>.
>
>The right way would be to look for
>
>(?<!<br)>
>
>and
>
><(?!br>)
>
>But while the 2nd of those works fine, the first throws REException.
>
>Is there a way around this without re-processing the string. I really
>don't want to get into special case handling if I can possibly avoid
>it.
>
>
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Alan Williamson | 2 Jul 2004 18:53
Favicon

Re: License Question

Brant Gurganus wrote:

> Alan Williamson wrote:
> 
>> I am developing a plugin for use within JEdit.
>>
>> The plugin is for a debugger into a commercial piece of software.  The 
>> commercial piece of software is not open-source.
>>
>> Therefore I ask the question; under the license terms of JEdit can we 
>> release this plugin?  Do plugins have to be under the GPL?
> 
> Plugins to my knowledge, can be under any license no matter what 
> application they are for or communicate with.  The only thing I know 
> where this would make a difference is if you tried to take a GPL'd 
> plugin, modified it, and then tried to release it under a proprietary 
> license.  That would be disallowed by derivative works clause.

okay thats how i am reading it; but again clarification is always a good 
thing.  The code for the plugin has been developed from scratch.  So no 
worries there.

Thanks Brant for the quick response.

Is there any plugin's at the moment for commercial software?

--

-- 
Alan Williamson, City Planner

w: http://www.BLOG-CITY.com/
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 10 comments |

Gmane