1 Jun 2008 19:49
Re: license confusion
Peter Graves <peter <at> armedbear.org>
2008-06-01 17:49:20 GMT
2008-06-01 17:49:20 GMT
On Fri, 30 May 2008 at 06:48:17 -0700, Jason Cady wrote: > I'm confused about the license of abcl. I read it several times, but I > can't make out how it applies in my situation. I am interested in > writing zlib and/or proprietary licensed game libraries in jscheme or > kawa scheme that link to abcl in order to access common lisp > libraries. Would that violate abcl's license terms? The point of the license is that you must make public (per the GPL) the source to any changes you make to ABCL itself. If you write an application that uses ABCL, you do not normally need to make the source of the application public. If the application requires modifications to ABCL, you need to make public only the source of those modifications. -Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
RSS Feed