Is it possible to have Gnus suppress reported spam articles, on gmane, that have been cancelled from the summary buffer? I have studied the manual but I haven't found something usable. Is the cancel information even available in the NOV files?
Steinar Bang <sb <at> dod.no> writes:
> Is it possible to have Gnus suppress reported spam articles, on
> gmane, that have been cancelled from the summary buffer?
I use xref to give a negative score to reported spam articles on
gmane. While looking at spam in a summary use V c to select a score
file for all the gmane groups and then L x s p ... Presumably a kill
can be done using a similar technique.
My all.SCORE file looks like this.
(("xref"
("gmane.spam.detected:" -1000 nil s))
("from"
...
("Steinar Bang" nil nil s)
...
--
--
Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated
WesternGeco -./\.- by myself and does not represent
pete.forman <at> westerngeco.com -./\.- the opinion of Schlumberger or
http://petef.port5.com -./\.- WesternGeco.
>>>>> Pete Forman <pete.forman <at> westerngeco.com>: > I use xref to give a negative score to reported spam articles on > gmane. That only takes those articles that are initially marked by spamassassin as spam. Those are the ones that are crossposted. However spam that's reported, and approved, is cancelled, and not cross posted to gmane.spam.detected. What I was wondering was if it was possible to detect the cancelled state from NOV information, and scoring down on that?
On 2007-05-21, Miernik <public <at> miernik.name> wrote:
> Great, but my main point was to ask how far you are to enabling phrase
> search?
Probably most of the way (in particular Xapian 1.0.0 has now been
released), but some work remains to be done and I'm reluctant to give a
timescale as it depends on how busy I am with other work and I don't
want to disappoint.
It should be less than 37 years though!
Cheers,
Olly
Steinar Bang <sb <at> dod.no> writes: > What I was wondering was if it was possible to detect the cancelled > state from NOV information, and scoring down on that? Nope. The NOV data isn't updated on the server when an article is cancelled. -- -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi <at> gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes: > Steinar Bang <sb <at> dod.no> writes: > >> What I was wondering was if it was possible to detect the cancelled >> state from NOV information, and scoring down on that? > > Nope. The NOV data isn't updated on the server when an article is > cancelled. Hello, I don't know much about nntp so maybe what I say is nonsense, but would it then be possible to crosspost the articles to the spam group before canceling them ? There has to be a way to detect and remove those messages from the summary buffer... Thanks, -- -- Rémi
Rémi Letot <hobbes <at> poukram.net> writes: > I don't know much about nntp so maybe what I say is nonsense, but > would it then be possible to crosspost the articles to the spam group > before canceling them ? Nope. > There has to be a way to detect and remove those messages from the > summary buffer... Not without statting the articles themselves, or re-generating the NOV file. -- -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi <at> gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
My posts to rubyonrails-talk <at> googlegroups.com only work through the google groups interface and not through the gmane interface. I haven't tried e-mailing the list, but as posts through google groups works fine, that doesn't seem necessary. the only e-mail address I use for gmane and google groups is "hawat.thufir <at> gmail.com" and I use the same e-mail address for both. "Gmane Autoauthorizer <auth <at> gmane.org> Sun, May 13, 2007 at 8:08 AM To: hawat.thufir <at> gmail.com You are now authorized to post to the gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rails newsgroup." I have the above e-mail, and just now looked at it. gmane posts fail silently, I don't get an e-mail that it failed nor that it passed. I suppose I could subscribe such that the actual list gets delivered to my e-mail account... Posts via gmane were working. Posts via the web work. what's up? -Thufir
There are no recent messages in gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.announce -- I'm not certain if this corresponds in time with when the list was moved from SourceForge to Apache.org several years ago, but this would seem plausible. There are several on-line archives of the list, so I don't think they object to having it on Gmane. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-announce/ The old location https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-announce has a prominent notice that the list has moved (although you have to click forward links for a while to reach the new location). /* era */ -- -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not.
Hi there, I can't reach http://search.gmane.org/. Is the server down? Thanks in advance
RSS Feed29 | |
|---|---|
61 | |
38 | |
21 | |
29 | |
51 | |
50 | |
103 | |
52 | |
107 | |
112 | |
72 | |
28 | |
68 | |
60 | |
17 | |
99 | |
85 | |
73 | |
22 | |
57 | |
11 | |
49 | |
33 | |
48 | |
46 | |
50 | |
67 | |
57 | |
52 | |
117 | |
138 | |
97 | |
284 | |
49 | |
72 | |
19 | |
34 | |
77 | |
45 | |
233 | |
80 | |
46 | |
16 | |
49 | |
130 | |
57 | |
34 | |
33 | |
28 | |
35 | |
39 | |
36 | |
59 | |
57 | |
26 | |
62 | |
19 | |
47 | |
64 | |
52 | |
68 | |
44 | |
62 | |
78 | |
43 | |
55 | |
76 | |
82 | |
33 | |
94 | |
64 | |
58 | |
54 | |
110 | |
75 | |
133 | |
211 | |
158 | |
111 | |
83 | |
97 | |
154 | |
58 | |
77 | |
75 | |
126 | |
109 | |
97 | |
210 | |
69 | |
116 | |
214 | |
162 | |
56 | |
112 | |
131 | |
183 | |
169 | |
187 | |
211 | |
248 | |
304 | |
193 | |
193 | |
118 | |
91 | |
63 | |
142 | |
106 | |
183 | |
303 | |
209 | |
294 | |
519 | |
278 | |
198 | |
246 | |
81 | |
146 | |
104 | |
225 | |
245 | |
127 | |
133 | |
202 | |
230 | |
218 | |
307 | |
55 | |
266 | |
222 | |
205 | |
338 | |
191 | |
42 |
