1 Aug 2003 14:07
Re: address encryption in uuencoded message parts
Clemens Fischer <ino-qc <at> spotteswoode.dnsalias.org>
2003-08-01 12:07:29 GMT
2003-08-01 12:07:29 GMT
* Reiner Steib: > in <URL:http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.leafnode/1877> > there's an uuencoded gzipped patch. The list is marked for > encryption ("X-Archive: encrypt"). Therefore, all lines in the > uuencoded containing a ` <at> ' are garbled. Any change to avoid this? i've been troubled with this same patch myself. you said you had found a propably tedious way to correct the wrong sequences in that patch. unfortunately my post to the list didn't come through (berolist requires me to be subscribed, and there's no way around that). since i need that patch, would you please tell me how i can correct this error, reiner? i'd also suggest that gmane shouldn't "encrypt" attachments that are obviously not meant to contain text-data with ` <at> ' characters in them, especially uu- or otherwise only-for-transit encoded stuff! clemens

> since i need that patch, would you please tell me how i can correct
> this error, reiner?
As Matthias announced leafnode-2.0.0.alpha20030731a yesterday, I guess
he also offers a patch to this on his web site.
> i'd also suggest that gmane shouldn't "encrypt" attachments that are
> obviously not meant to contain text-data with ` <at> ' characters in them,
> especially uu- or otherwise only-for-transit encoded stuff!
See Lars' answer: I guess it's not so easy to avoid it in Gmane's
without a risk of *not* encrypting real addresses.
Bye, Reiner.



RSS Feed