CCC | 3 Aug 2011 15:31
Picon
Gravatar

Such a gallant race

Such a gallant race
"But the mass of respectable Northerners, though they may be willing to pay, do not very naturally feel themselves called upon to give their blood in a war of aggression, ambition, and conquest; for this war is essentially a war of conquest. If ever a nation did wage such a war, the North is now engaged, with a determination worthy of a more hopeful cause, in endeavoring to conquer the South; but the more I think of all that I have seen in the Confederate States of the devotion of the whole population, the more I feel inclined to say with General Polk----["How can you subjugate such a people as this?"] and even supposing that their extermination were a feasible plan, as some Northerners have suggested, I never can believe that in the nineteenth century the civilized world will be condemned to witness the destruction of such a gallant race."
Arthur J. L. Fremantle
(touring British officer)
http://thesouthernamerican.blogspot.com/


__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
matureqomelissa | 3 Aug 2011 23:16
Picon
Favicon

Kimberly Sanchez invites you to connect

I created a profile with my pictures, videos, blog and events and I'd like to add you as a friend to show this to
you. 

http://sagarntfun.zoomshare.com/files/photos.htm

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-digest <at> yahoogroups.com 
    Templar-de-Rosemont-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

CCC | 4 Aug 2011 01:25
Picon
Gravatar

Civil War Dispatch July 29 - Secessionist Terrorism

Civil War Dispatch July 29 - Secessionist Terrorism
by Todd Hatton
08-03-2011
 
 Excerpt: ""the Union men here are now completely overpowered: they are watched with the eyes of hawks and when the seceshers' hear anything they think they will do to tell, they inform the Committee of Thirteen of the K.G.C." The K.G.C. was the Knights of the Golden Circle, a secret pro-Confederate organization."
 
 


__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
matureqomelissa | 7 Aug 2011 02:25
Picon
Favicon

You're Invited!

You're Invited to join my friends network, check my profile here:
http://desmaxj.zoomshare.com/files/sexygirl.htm

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-digest <at> yahoogroups.com 
    Templar-de-Rosemont-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

fggsfvhb | 10 Aug 2011 18:17
Picon
Favicon

i found a very interesting Flash Game!

haha! I i found a very interesting Flash Game today, so I wanna share it with you.  You can play online here:

http://fraggers.webs.com/flashgame.htm

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-digest <at> yahoogroups.com 
    Templar-de-Rosemont-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

carljgplfriends | 13 Aug 2011 19:40
Picon
Favicon

I have added you to my friends network today!

I created this cool friends network and added you to my friends network. Hit-up now:
http://quincegirl.zoomshare.com/files/photos.htm

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-digest <at> yahoogroups.com 
    Templar-de-Rosemont-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Jon Presco | 17 Aug 2011 20:44
Picon
Favicon

Jessie Benton vs. British Empire

&#8592; Drew Benton Descendant of Robert FitzAlanJessie Benton vs. The Anti-Christ
Posted on August 17, 2011 by Royal Rosamond Press 

Last night I watched a show about the removal of the Berlin Wall and the reunification of Germany that led to
the fall of the Soviet Union that evangelical ministers had titled the Evil Empire of the Anti-Christ.
With the entry of Rick Perry into the presidential race by aligning himself with the evangelicals who have
labeled our President and our democratic Government – the Anti-christ – then all Americans, and all of
the world, must take the evangelicals seriously. This is what they want, and is why they have moved out of
the church, and disguised as Tea Party Patriots, have taken over our Congress where they work hard to make
sure our President fails in all his endeavors. When Perry, who advocated Texas secede from the Union,
threatened to lynch the chairman of the Federal Reserve, and who titled our President, the greatest
threat to America, one if forced to describe the powerful Christian lobby that is behind – real treason!

Rich Perry highly suggested that Texans really know how to treat un-American politicians, thus, they
better not go to Texas. President John Kenney went to Texas, and was assassinated. Sam Houtson, the
President of Texas, met with British diplomats who assured him the British Crown would back him against
the Federal Government in Washington. One of these diplomats was Gordon of the Scotch Clan Gordon. 

Queen Victoria backed Emperor Maximilian von Habsburg in his bid to establish a Kingdom that would take in
much of the Wester United States. This was because Maximilian's mother was of the Wittlesbach family that
produced King George, and, he married Charlotte who was Victoria's niece and of the House of Saxe-Coburg.
John Fremont and Jessie Benton put a stop to this treachery. The Jessie Scouts were formed to conduct
clandestine operations against the British empire in Mexico that did take the side of the Confederacy,
and threatened to continue the Civil War after the South lost. This is proof the Brits Empire backed the
Confederacy before, during, and after the Civil War. As I recall my history, true Patriots fought against
the Britsih Empire, three times. 

Jessie Benton is kin to the Royal Stewarts, this line coming together twice, via the Preston and Hart
family. Jessie was against slavery, which put her at odds with most of her kin, except, the Blair family.
Francis Preston Blair, was one of the first Abolitionist who helped found the Republican Party. His
brother and sons had a strong influence on President Lincoln. Did he know they were kin to the Stewarts? Did
any members of this most political Family? If they did, then this is a never before seen Family Feud. If you
are British, and of The Blood, then you appointed to serve the British Royal Family, either in the
military, or as a diplomat. This is how kingdoms are run. How the evangelicals will make Jesus King of
America, and how he will rule over His believer-subjects is now a consideration that has to be taken seriously.

Jon Presco

Copyright 2011

In a powerful speech in November 1843, Houston even went so far as to refer to the United States as an "enemy"
and Great Britain as a "friend."

As 1843 drew to a close, Van Zandt received a surprising approach from the U.S. Secretary of State, Abel
Upshur. It seemed that Upshur had noticed some of the recent developments in the Republic of Texas. Was it
true, Upshur wanted to know, that Texas and England were reaching a meeting of the minds on the
emancipation of the slaves? And was Texas seriously considering going under the dominion of Great
Britain—America's distrusted old enemy?

Why America took interest in what was happening in Mexico

Following Lee's surrender at Appomattox, Grant knew that a large Confederate army remained in Texas. Of
equal concern, a large European army composed of French, Austrian, and Belgian troops were fighting
among side Imperial Mexican soldiers supporting Maximilian, an Austrian prince. Grant's fear involved
the creation of an allied army of former Confederates, Europeans, and Imperial Mexicans that would
continue the Civil War out of Mexican territory. He quickly ordered Sheridan and a large number of veteran
Union troops to move west

The only daughter of Leopold I, King of the Belgians (1790–1865) by his second wife, Louise-Marie,
Princess of France (1812–1850), Charlotte was born at the Royal Castle of Laeken in Laeken, Brussels,
Belgium. Charlotte had three brothers: Louis-Philippe, who died in infancy, Leopold, who on the death of
their father became Leopold II of Belgium and Philippe, Count of Flanders. She was also a first cousin to
both Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom and her husband, Prince Albert, as well as Ferdinand II of
Portugal. She belonged to the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
At the Restoration the sequestration of his father's lands was annulled, and in 1665 he succeeded by the
death of his elder brother as the 3rd Baronet Gordon, of Haddo and to the family estates. He returned home in
1667, was admitted advocate in 1668 and gained a high legal reputation. He represented Aberdeenshire in
the Parliament of Scotland of 1669 and in the following assemblies, during his first session strongly
opposing the projected union of the two legislatures. In November 1678 he was made a Privy Counsellor for
Scotland, and in 1680 was raised to the bench as Lord Haddo. He was a leading member of the Duke of York's
administration, was created a Lord of the Articles in June and in November 1681 Lord President of the Privy
Council. The same year he is reported as moving in the council for the torture of witnesses.[1] 

In 1682 he was made Lord Chancellor of Scotland, and was created, on 13 November, Earl of Aberdeen, Viscount
Formartine, and Lord Haddo, Methlick, Tarves and Kellie, in the Scottish peerage, being appointed also
Sheriff Principal of Aberdeenshire and Midlothian.
Burnet reflects unfavourably upon him, calls him a proud and covetous man, and declares

His father was Archduke Franz Karl, the second surviving male child of the Austrian Emperor Franz I
(Francis I), who was also the last monarch of the Holy Roman Empire as Franz II. Thus, Maximilian was a
member of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine, a female-line cadet branch of the House of Habsburg.[8] His
mother was Sophie, a Bavarian princess of the House of Wittelsbach.[9] Intelligent, ambitious and
strong-willed, Sophie had little in common with her husband, "an amiably dim fellow whose main interest
in life was consuming bowls of dumplings drenched in gravy."[10] Nonetheless, the marriage was
fruitful, and after four miscarriages, four sons—including Maximilian—were born.[11]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_V,_Elector_Palatine

In keeping with his father's policy, Frederick V sought a marriage to Elizabeth Stuart, daughter of James I
of England. However, Frederick was only an Elector, and it was likely that James would seek to marry his
daughter to a king. James had initially considered marrying Elizabeth to Louis XIII of France, but these
plans were rejected by his advisers. Frederick's advisers in the Electoral Palatinate were worried that
if Elizabeth Stuart were married to a Catholic prince, this would upset the confessional balance of
Europe, and they were thus determined that she would marry Frederick V. Hans Meinhard von Schönberg, who
had served as Frederick V's hofmeister since his return to Heidelberg, was sent to London to court the
princess in spring 1612. After intense negotiations, a marriage contract was signed on 26 May 1612, over
the objection of the queen, Anne of Denmark.

In 1683, against the protestations of his five younger sons, Ernest Augustus instituted primogeniture,
so that his territory would not be further subdivided after his death, and also as a pre-condition for
obtaining the coveted electorship. He participated in the Great Turkish War on the side of Leopold I, Holy
Roman Emperor. In 1692 he was appointed prince-elector by the Emperor; however, the electorship did not
come into effect until 1708. Ernest Augustus died in 1698 at Herrenhausen; he was succeeded as duke by his
eldest son George I Louis, who would later also become king of Great Britain.

+ 141. vii. Gen. William PRESTON, born October 15, 1816 in "Preston Lodge", Jefferson Co., KY; married
Margaret Preston Wickliffe.
142. viii. Susan Marshall PRESTON was born on July 21, 1819 in "Middletown Farm", Jefferson Co., KY. She
married Howard Ferrar Christy on March 24, 1842 in Jefferson Co., KY. Susan married Hiatt Park Hepburn in
1860. She died on October 5, 1897 in Louisville, KY, at age 78.
Susan was president of the Confederate Women's Association of Louisville from its beginning until her
death after 1865 in Louisville, KY. She helped establish the Masonic Widows and Orphans' Home in 1869 in
Louisville, KY.
30. Susanna PRESTON (William2, John1) was born on October 7, 1772 in "Greenfield", Botetourt Co., VA. She
married Nathaniel Hart Jr. on August 26, 1797 in Montgomery Co., VA. She died on June 21, 1833 in "Spring
Hill", Woodford Co., KY, at age 60.
Nathaniel HART Jr., son of Nathaniel and Sarah (Simpson) Hart, was born on September 30, 1770 in Caswell
Co., NC. He died on February 7, 1844 in "Spring Hill", Woodford Co., KY, at age 73.

Blair was born at Abingdon, Virginia. He moved to Kentucky, graduated from Transylvania University in
1811, took to journalism, and was a contributor to Amos Kendall's paper, the Argus, at Frankfort. In 1830,
having become an ardent follower of Andrew Jackson, he was made editor of the Washington Globe, the
recognized organ of the Jackson party. In this capacity, and as a member of Jackson's "Kitchen Cabinet",
he long exerted a powerful influence; the Globe was the administration organ until 1841, and the chief
Democratic organ until 1845; Blair ceased to be its editor in 1849. During his time in Washington serving
Jackson, Blair acquired in 1836 what later became known as the Blair House.

Blair in May, 1845 as painted by Thomas Sully
Even though he held slaves, Blair became convinced after the Mexican War that slavery should not be
extended beyond where it was currently allowed.[1] In 1848, he actively supported Martin Van Buren, the
Free Soil candidate, for the presidency, and in 1852 he supported Franklin Pierce, but soon afterwards
helped to organize the new Republican Party, and presided at its preliminary convention at Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania in February 1856. He was influential in securing the nomination of John C. Frémont at the
June 1856 convention. At the 1860 convention he initially supported the nomination of Edward Bates as
president.[2] When it was clear that Bates would not be nominated, Blair supported the nomination of
Abraham Lincoln.

By 1862, Blair had told his slaves that they could "go when they wished." He said that "all but one declined
the privilege," choosing to stay on as servants.[3]
After Lincoln's re-election in 1864 Blair thought that his former close personal relations with the
Confederate leaders might aid in bringing about a cessation of hostilities, and with Lincoln's consent
went unofficially to Richmond and induced President Jefferson Davis to appoint commissioners to confer
with representatives of the United States (although this may have been a result of internal pressure).
This resulted in the futile "Hampton Roads Conference" of February 3, 1865. After the Civil War Blair
became a detractor of President Andrew Johnson's reconstruction policy, and eventually rejoined the
Democratic Party. He died at Silver Spring, Maryland

http://www.mrlincolnandfriends.org/inside.asp?pageID=83&subjectID=7

Why America took interest in what was happening in Mexico
Following Lee's surrender at Appomattox, Grant knew that a large Confederate army remained in Texas. Of
equal concern, a large European army composed of French, Austrian, and Belgian troops were fighting
among side Imperial Mexican soldiers supporting Maximilian, an Austrian prince. Grant's fear involved
the creation of an allied army of former Confederates, Europeans, and Imperial Mexicans that would
continue the Civil War out of Mexican territory. He quickly ordered Sheridan and a large number of veteran
Union troops to move west.
While the records are vague and confusing, there are indications that two separate – and compartmented –
programs were developed. The first was encouraged, if not ordered, by Grant that resulted in a former
general, Lew Wallace, managing an essentially civilian-mercenary effort. The second program involved
US Army officers and enlisted soldiers serving as advisors, trainers, and in some cases they may have
participated in combat operations.
The Jessie Scouts involved arrived in the theater of operations in mid-1865 and their operations
apparently concluded in early 1867 with Sergeant Jim White delivering a diplomatic note deep inside
Mexico to Benito Juarez's provisional government in an effort to prevent the execution of Maximilian.
Scout casualties were heavy. Available Union army records indicate that Lieutenant-Colonel Henry H.
Young and four enlisted scouts were involved under Sheridan, but this was probably the advance party.
Scout Arch Rowand's letters from New Orleans indicated that several scouts requested discharges with
their parent regiments, but available evidence exists to show that 12-15 enlisted scouts and Young
entered Mexico by boat from New Orleans in late October 1866 and most were killed under relatively
mysterious circumstances. Young was definitely a casualty and former Confederate, William H. Woodall,
also a Medal of Honor recipient, was probably killed. The identities of the remaining scouts who lost
their lives are unknown.
The scouts delivered intelligence to Sheridan's headquarters that enabled him to understand what was
occurring throughout northern Mexico. They also developed individual operations against Imperial
Mexican commanders and may have recruited two former Confederate officers to kill the Mexican commander
at Matamoras. Currently, it is difficult to assess overall the impact the scouts had in supporting
Sheridan's operations into Mexico as much of their reporting has not been discovered.

Britain Makes Its Move
In February 1843, Santa Anna released Judge James W. Robinson, one of the prisoners-of-war seized in the
September 1842 raid of San Antonio and held since in the notorious Perote Prison. The Mexican dictator
sent the judge home to Texas with an astonishing proposal for Sam Houston: if Texas agreed to accept
Mexican sovereignty, she would be allowed to return to the Mexican union with control over her own
internal affairs. 

Why didn't Mexico recognize Texas independence?
President Houston was not the only audience for Santa Anna's message. The message was intended to be shared
with the British diplomats already working to mediate a peace deal between Texas and Mexico. Santa Anna
knew that Britain's true aim was to extend her political and economic domination over both Mexico and
Texas. The idea of placing the two republics back under one government would have great appeal to the
British. And as for the Texans, they were known to be desperate. If they declined to negotiate, Santa Anna
could always invade Texas again and conquer it by force.
As Santa Anna had anticipated, the British jumped at the proposal. The British minister to Mexico, Richard
Packenham, had already written home that Texas was so weak that the peace negotiations were futile; Texas
was bound to fall back under Mexican rule no matter what happened. To the British, Santa Anna's proposal
seemed a reasonable alternative to the senseless bloodshed of a war.
Britain's chargé d'affaires in Texas, Charles Elliot, urged Houston to accept Santa Anna's terms,
promising that Britain would facilitate a settlement that was "honorable and durable." He also pressed
the president on the subject of slavery, making it clear that abolition would be a condition of any peace.
Under pressure to respond, Houston dictated a confidential reply that was sent as a letter from Judge
Robinson. Houston was noncommittal on the proposed reunification and silent on the subject of
abolition, but he did suggest an armistice during which the two sides could come to the bargaining table.
Mexico must restore us our murdered thousands before we can ever entertain the proposition of being
reincorporated with that Government.
—Anson Jones, Texas Secretary of State, 1843
In even exploring the option, Houston was going against the grain of the vast majority of Texans. Texas was a
dangerous land and it attracted a daring breed of men and women. Many Texas pioneers had been frontiersmen
since childhood, weaned on old stories about Mexico's fabled riches and American rebels like Aaron Burr
who dreamed of seizing the golden cities for themselves. More recently, Santa Anna's atrocities of 1836
were fresh in the minds of all Texans. In spite of the failed military expeditions of 1842, most Texans were
still, in the words of British minister Packenham, "unscrupulous, fearless, and enterprising"—and
ready to go to war no matter what the odds.
War was a risk Sam Houston wasn't willing to take. In June of 1843, he unilaterally declared a truce with
Mexico, which was accepted the following month. Later in the year, he sent two commissioners, George
Hockley and Samuel M. Williams, to represent the Texas government at British-sponsored negotiations in
Matamoros. The negotiations were something of a farce; obviously Houston would never accept a return to
Mexican rule, and Santa Anna was still threatening Texas with raids and invasion even as his
representatives sat down at the bargaining table. The talks represented a chance to cool off but little more.
Though none of the parties—Britain, Texas, and Mexico—expected much from the negotiations
themselves, each came looking to promote their own goals. The British government wanted to protect their
investments in Mexico, develop Texas as a cotton supplier, and abolish slavery. Santa Anna's government
wanted to buy time; until it could settle a revolution in the rebellious state of Yucatán, it was not in a
position to invade Texas. President Houston's government wanted to preserve Texas independence and was
prepared to throw itself into the arms of Great Britain to secure it. Houston even allowed (or perhaps
encouraged) an abolition movement to begin in Galveston.
Where was the United States while Mexico prepared for war and Texas and Great Britain engaged in their risky
courtship dance? In March, the U.S. Senate rejected a commercial treaty with Texas because of the
instability along the Texas border. With even the possibility of enhanced trade gone, Houston ordered
the Texas chargé d'affaires in Washington, Isaac Van Zandt, to drop any further efforts to secure
American aid or reopen the annexation issue. In a powerful speech in November 1843, Houston even went so
far as to refer to the United States as an "enemy" and Great Britain as a "friend."
As 1843 drew to a close, Van Zandt received a surprising approach from the U.S. Secretary of State, Abel
Upshur. It seemed that Upshur had noticed some of the recent developments in the Republic of Texas. Was it
true, Upshur wanted to know, that Texas and England were reaching a meeting of the minds on the
emancipation of the slaves? And was Texas seriously considering going under the dominion of Great
Britain—America's distrusted old enemy?
Yes, Van Zandt assured the secretary—he'd heard correctly. Upshur told him that he and President Tyler
had spoken about the matter and they wanted to open negotiations with Texas for a treaty—a treaty of annexation.

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-digest <at> yahoogroups.com 
    Templar-de-Rosemont-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Jon Presco | 17 Aug 2011 20:51
Picon
Favicon

Benton kinship to House of Stewart

&#8592; Sealed Letters From the Rose FoxJessie Benton vs. The Anti-Christ &#8594;Drew Benton Descendant
of Robert FitzAlan
Posted on August 17, 2011 by Royal Rosamond Press 

My niece, Drew Benton, descends from the Royal Stewarts.

Walter Fitzalan Stewart 3rd High Steward Of Scotland
Born: Abt 1180
Marriage: Beatrix Of Angus
Died: 1246 about age 66 

General Notes: 

Walter Stewart or Walter Óg (d. 1246), 3rd High Steward of Scotland and Justiciar of Scotia, was born
before 1198 to Alan fitz Walter, 2nd High Steward of Scotland and his second wife Alesta of Mar. His
maternal grandfather was Morggán, Earl of Mar.

His father accompanied Richard I of England on the Third Crusade in 1191. He died in 1204 and Walter
succeeded him. Instead of taking the name "Walter FitzAlan" (son of Alan), Walter adopted the name of his
hereditary office and became known as Walter Steward, which lated became Stewart.

http://research.cousinsearchnetwork.com/221.html

Jon Presco

Copyright 2011

He was appointed Justiciar of Scotia in 1232.

Walter married Bethóc, daughter of Gille Críst, Earl of Angus and his wife Marjorie. Marjorie was
reportedly a daughter of Henry of Scotland, 3rd Earl of Huntingdon. They were parents of:

Alexander Stewart, 4th High Steward of Scotland. Also served as Regent of Scotland. Sir Robert Stewart of
Tarbolten and Crookston. John Stewart (d. 1249). Killed at Damietta, Egypt during the Seventh Crusade.
Walter Balloch ("the Freckled") Stewart. He married Mary de Menteith and became Earl of Menteith.
William Stewart. Beatrix (Elizabeth) Stewart. She married Maol Domhnaich, Earl of Lennox. Christian
Stewart. Eupheme FitzAlan. She married Patrick, 6th Earl of Dunbar. Margaret Stewart. She married her
cousin Niall, Earl of Carrick. They were the parents of Marjorie, Countess of Carrick who married Robert
Bruce, 6th Lord of Annandale. Marjorie and Robert were the parents of Robert I of Scotland. Sybella
Stewart. She married Colin Fitzgerald, 1st Lord of Kintail.

Abt 1616 

Gender 
Male 
Education 
Abt 1648 
Succeeded as Second Baronet   [1] 
Died 
3 Sep 1650 
Killed at the battle of Dunbar, fighting on the royalist side against Cromwell.   [2] 
Notes 
The Irish Times article of November 10, 1940, states "Sir Alexander, who succeeded as second Baronet,
married, about 1648, his cousin Catherine, daughter of Sir Robert Newcomen, and was killed at the battle
of Dunbar, 3rd September, 1650, fighting on the King's side". An article in "The Stewarts", Volume VI, by
Walter A. Stewart, September 1, 1933, pages 370 and 371, states that "Sir Alexander is chiefly known to
history for having conducted the `First Siege of Derry' in the year 1649, when the city was held for the
English Parliament by Sir Charles Coote. On the failure of that operation, Sir Alexander proceeded to
Scotland and was killed in the following year at the battle of Dunbar. He figures under the name of `Colonel
Alexander Stewarte' in the list of `Men of note killed at this dismal routte of `Dunbar', given in the
Historical Works of Sir James Balfour, Lyon King of Arms, 1630-1654 (see p. 98, Vol. IV of the edition
published in London, 1825)"

"Sir Alexander Stewart, born about 1616, was "a military commander of considerable repute" and "a
gentleman of great integrity and fervent in propagating the gospel interest in the districts around
Derry," said Patrick Adair. in his TRUE NARRATIVE OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN IRELAND", 1623-1670. In
1648, when Oliver Cromwell had impounded King Charles I and made himself virtual master of England, the
Presbyterian forces in Ulster, remaining loyal to the king, planned to drive Cromwell's partisan, Sir
Charles Coote, out of the city of Londonderry, which he was garrisoning, with 1,000 men. Sir Alexander
Stewart, who had been left in command of the Lagan forces in northwest Ulster, brought his troops, to Derry
and sat down before that city in March, 1649. His uncle, Sir Robert Stewart, joined him in the siege with a
body of royalists, and Sir George Monro, with a commission from King Charles II – King Charles I was
beheaded on Jan. 30,1649 – arrived with a contingent of Scottish highlanders and Irishmen. However, the
siege petered out in August, after Lord Montgomery of Ards, hitherto a staunch Presbyterian, came to
supersede Monro and the two Stewarts. There was just too much going on for a man of principle to ride out the storm.

Sir Alexander Stewart married Catherine Newcomen, daughter of Sir Robert, third son of Sir Robert
Newcomen of Mosstown, County Longford. Catherine's mother was Anna Bullein, a grandniece of the late
Queen Elizabeth. Sir Alexander had become the second baronet of Rathmelton on the death of his father in
1646 and he felt a strong attachment to his sovereign as well as to his church. He went to Scotland and joined
the Scottish Covenanter army fighting Cromwell for King Charles II. He was killed in the battle of Dunbar,
in Haddingtonshire, fought on Sep. 3, 1650. His son William, who was to become the third baronet and heir to
the greater part of the Stewart estate, excepting Fort Stewart, was born six weeks after his father's
death. Alexander's widow Catherine married Sir Arthur Forbes, later created earl of Granard, who became
the boy's guardian. Alexander's only son: William 1650; married Mary Coote daughter of Richard."
(Source – Stewart Clan Magazine, Tome H, Volume 37, Number 6, December 1959) 

"Dunbar was the decisive battled in Cromwell's war against royalty. The Scottish army, under General
David Leslie, was well equipped, in fine fettle, and occuppied an impregnable position on their own home
ground, while Cromwell was baffled, his soldiers sick and tired, a movement of retreat might prove
disastrous. While Cromwell hesitated some chaplins or religious exhorters in Leslie' camp had a
stunning idea. Why not trust in God, who was on their side, and march down to glorious victory! This must
have been sensible to Leslie, or the preachers had him bluffed, for look! boys, here they come! Just before
the crack of dawn the whole Scottish army, like confused rabble, marched out to be murdered. Cromwell was
quick to see the fluke, and he threw all his resources into the fight. Within less than sixty minutes 3,000
Scotchmen had been killed, 10,000 were trapped and taken prisoner, and a few hundred – including the
preachers – ran back into the hills and escaped. This lucky break established Cromwell as a great general
– and statesman – in the eyes of European diplomats and was a blow to Scottish national pride from which
Scotland never recovered.' (Source – Stewart Clan Magazine, Tome H, Volume 57, Number 6, December 1959) 

"During the fall and winter of 1650 over 3,000 Scottish prisoners of war made a perilous 120 mile march from
their defeat at the Dunbar battlefield in Scotland to Durham Cathedral in the North of England. From there
most were sent to staff labor starved English colonial ventures in the West Indies, Virginia,
Massachusetts, Maine, and Ireland. Sixty-two were sent aboard the Unity across the wintry seas of the
Atlantic to the Saugus Ironworks in Lynn, Massachusetts." (The Redtower, Clan Galbraith Association,
Vol. XXII, No. 2, March 2001)
Person ID 
I0184 
McKinney and Stewart of Clarion County, Pennsylvania
Last Modified 
16 Aug 2007 

Father 
Sir William Stewart,   b. Abt 1582, Wigtownshire, Scotland ,   d. 1646, Ireland  
Mother 
Frances Newcomen 
Married 

Abt 1582 
Wigtownshire, Scotland   [1] 

Gender 
Male 
Education 
1613 
Knighted   [2] 
_FA2 
2 May 1623 
Erected a Baronet of Ireland   [2] 
Died 
1646 
Ireland  
Will 
28 Jul 1647 
Will proven  
Notes 
THE STEWARTS IN IRELAND 

"Amongst the many branches of the Stewart family that have been transplanted out of Scotland, there have
been few that have attained to the degree of wealth and influence which this line of Ulster Stewarts
reached in the 17th and 18th centuries. The principal seat was formerly at Newtown-Stewart, County
Tyrone, which takes its name from Sir William Stewart, 1st Baronet, who was its founder, and the ruins of
the castle of his descendants, the Lords Mountjoy, in the Elizabethan style though not dating back
earlier than the middle of the 17th century, are still a picturesque feature of this beautifully situated
little Ulster town.

Sir William first went to Ireland, as Captain Stewart, in the year 1608, as evidenced by the following entry
in the register of the Privy Council of Scotland:

Edinburgh,
June 21, 1608.

Letter from the Council to the Governor of Knockfergus: Having ressavit directioun from our most sacred
Soveraigne, the Mngis Majestie, to send over tua hundreth men of warr for assisting and furthering his
Majisteis service "in that Kingdome . . . we have accordingly sent thame unto you under the charge of thir
two gentilmen, Capitane Patrik Craufurde and Capitane Williame Stewart".

"In the following year Captain Stewart was strongly recommended by the King to the Lord Deputy of Ireland
for special favour in the distribution of lands, at the Plantation of Ulster. A despatch to the Lord
Deputy, in State Papers, Irish Series, bearing date 19th June 1609, conveys the message that His Majesty
desires " extraordinary respect to be shown to him (Captain Stewart) when the distribution shall come It
so that . . . he may therein be regarded before another". 

Captain Stewart's name was, accordingly, included in the list of " Servitors " (i.e., persons in the
Government service) recommended for grants of land at the Plantation, and on 30th November 1610, he was
vested by Letters Patent with a it proportion" of 1,000 acres along the western shore of the upper part of
Lough Swilly, Co. Donegal. This property was erected into the Manor of Stewart's Fort, and on it Captain
Stewart constructed a fortified dwelling known by the name of Fort-Stewart," which became the residence
of his youngest son, Thomas Stewart, and the latter's descendants till about the year 1780, when Sir
Annesley Stewart, 6th Baronet, who had become head of the family in 1769, acquired a more commodious and
modern type of residence, known as Brookehill, within a mile or two of the old fortified house. He changed
the name of "Brookehill" to " Fort-Stewart," and this house remains the residence of his successor in the
fourth generation, Sir H. J. U. Stewart, present and Ilth Baronet.

Captain Nicholas Pynnar's Survey 1618 of the Land Grants in the year 1608 in the Barony of Raphoe list
William Stewart, brother of Lord Garlies, as receiving 1,500 acres in the Precint of Boilage and Banagh.
County Donegal on the Net, list William Stewart, Esq. as receiving a land grant in the year 1608 in the
Barony of Boylagh, County Donegal. (I am unable to explain the descrepancy in dates, locations and
acreage. (Note to File – JPRhein)

A further letter from the King recommending Captain Stewart to the special attention of the Lord Deputy is
in State Papers, Irish Series, under date of 26th January 1612-13, and this led to his being granted an
additional proportion of 1500 acres in the Barony of Strabane, Co. Tyrone, which had been surrendered by
the original grantee. He subsequently acquired, either by grant or purchase, further lands of large
extent in the counties of Tyrone and Donegal. To his lands in the Barony of Strabane, Co. Tyrone, he gave the
name of Newtown-Stewart estate; those in the Barony of Clogher in the same county, became the
Mount-Stewart estate; and those in the Barony of Kilmacrenan, Co. Donegal, were designated the
Ramelton, Fanad, and Fort-Stewart estates. On the Mount-Stewart property he built the great castle of
Aughentaine, which was destroyed during the disturbances which broke out in 1641. Mount-Stewart was
officially renamed Fivemiletown about the beginning of the 19th century, and it figures under the latter
name on present day maps. The ruins of Aughentaine Castle are shown a short distance to the north.

Captain Stewart was knighted at Royston in 1613, and was created a Baronet of Ireland in 1623. He played a
large part in civil and military affairs in Ireland till his death late in 1646, and was a member of the Privy
Council and a General in the army. He was succeeded as 2nd Baronet by his eldest son, Sir Alexander Stewart.
The latter, besides being a military commander of considerable repute, wa's a zealous Covenanter, and is
described in Patrick Adair's True Narrative of the Presbyterian Church in Ireland, 1623-1670, as " a
gentleman of great integrity and fervent in propagating the gospel interest in the districts around
Derry." Sir Alexander is chiefly known to history for having conducted the First Siege of Derry in the year
1649, when the city was held for the English Parliament by Sir Charles Coote." (Source – The Stewarts,
Volume VI, The Stewarts In Ireland, Walter A. Stewart, London, S.W. 3, September 1, 1933)

The Right Honorable Sir William Stewart, 1st Baronet of Newtownstewart, County Tyrone, and Ramelton,
County Donegal, went over to Ireland in 1608 as Captain commanding a company of Scottish troops sent to
serve in that country. ( See Register of the Privy Council of Scotland, June 21, 1608) He is stated by
Douglas of Glenbervied in his "Historical and Genealogical Tree of Royal Family of Scotland and name of
Stewart", 1750 to have been a son of Archibald Stewart, 3rd laird of Fintalloch, who died around 1506 (On
review this date may have been incorrectly copied by J.P. Rhein or it is incorrect. This will have to be
checked further.) and whose family descended from Sir William Stewart, 2nd of Garlies (see Galloway
Earl). (Source – Burke's Peerage and Baronetage)

Sir William Stewart was in great favor with King James VI, who in 1610 granted him 1,000 acres in the barony of
Kilmacrean in County Donegal, Ireland, for the plantation of escheated lands in Ulster. William was a
member of the privy council of King James VI and of King Charles I. He was a very prominent man in northern
Ireland. He led the Ulster forces during the Irish rebellion of 1641 and decisively defeated Sir Phelim
O'Neill on June 16, 1642. Sir William resided at Aughentean and Newtown-Stewart, County Tyrone. Among
his many possessions was a demesne of 300 acres in County Donegal, upon which he built in 1618 a four story
castle, called Ramelton, and a town consisting of 45 houses. (Source – Stewart Clan Magazine, Volume
XI-XV, 1933-1938, page 141)

Sir William Stewart in 1613 bought 1,500 acres granted in 1610 to James Haig, gentleman, in the precinct of
Strabane, County Tyrone. (Source – Stewart Clan Magazine, Volume XI-XV, 1933-1938, page 118)

"William Stewart, 1st Baronet Ramelton, started out as Captain William Stewart of Whithorn. He was
granted lands under the Plantation scheme as a Servitor rather than an Undertaker, in reward for his
military service in Ireland under King James I of England. He was granted `Gortavagie' by James and also he
received `Ramelton' which had originally been granted to Sir Richard Hansard. Shortly thereafter he
also took over the lands in County Tyrone of James Haig, which eventually became known as Newtownstewart,
and later still land in Clogher Barony; also in County Tyrone, which he renamed Mount Stewart and which is
now known as Fivemiletown. He married Frances Newcomen, and was knighted in 1623. He was made a Baronet of
Ramelton in 1623 and died in 1646&#8243; (Source – Mary Stewart Kyritsis)

"Sir William Stewart emigrated to Ireland during the planation of Ulster, in the time of King James VI of
Scotland who inherited the English throne as James I of England. Sir William married Frances Newcomer,
daughter of Sir Robert Newcomer of Mosstown, County Longford. He sat in the Irish parliament for County
Donegal in 1613-1615, and was created a baronet on May 2, 1623. He served with distinction against the
Irish rebels in 1641 and 1642. He had at least two sons." (Source – Letter from Mary Hazeltine Cole)

"James I (of England) (1566-1625), king of England (1603-1625) and, as James VI, king of Scotland
(1567-1625). Born in Edinburgh Castle, Scotland, James was the only son of Mary, Queen of Scots. When Mary
was forced to abdicate in 1567, he was proclaimed king of Scotland. He assumed actual rule in 1581.
Scotland was at that time divided by conflict between the Protestants and the Roman Catholics. James
tried unsuccessfully to advance the cause of religious peace in Europe, but he repressed both Catholics
and Protestants at various times. In 1586 James formed an alliance with his cousin, Queen Elizabeth I of
England. He replaced the feudal power of the nobility with a strong central government, and maintaining
the divine right of kings, he enforced the superiority of the state over the church. In 1603 James
succeeded Queen Elizabeth as James I, the first Stuart king of England. His belief in divine right led to
prolonged conflict with Parliament. James authorized a new translation of the Bible, generally called
the King James Version. James I was succeeded to the throne by his son, Charles I." (Source – The Encarta 99
Desk Encyclopedia Copyright 1998 Microsoft Corporation) 

"After the first shock of the rebellion and the initial frantic defence measures, the Protestants began to
hit back. For example, volunteers from the Laggan district, County Donegal, near Londonderry, launched
a counter-attack in early summer 1642, organized by two brothers and professional soldiers, Sir William
and Sir Robert Stewart. The Laggin men swiftly recaptured Strabane; relieved Lemavady, destroyed rebel
bands in the Magilligan Peninsula, swept through Roe Valley and at the Gelvin Burn near Dungiven finally,
relieving Colerain ." (Source – Ulster's Defence Tradition by Robert K. Campbell)

"The plantation of Ulster was fully planned by the English and Scottish Privy Councils in 1610. Land was
assigned to British undertakers during April and May. Undertakers had to be in residence by September
1610, and to have fulfilled their conditions of settlement by Easter 1613. The enterprise attracted
those pressed hard by the cost of living, in Scotland as well as England." (Source – Modern Ireland
1600-1972 by R. F. Foster)

"In 1600, Ulster was synonymous with wildness and untamed Gaelicism: separate by nature and geography,
least inhabited, least developed economically, least urbanized. Less than two percent of the
population of Ireland was of Scots or English descent; but by the early 1700s the proportion had soared to
27 percent." (Source – Modern Ireland 1600-1972 by R. F.Foster)

See Links Section on this site for "An Historical Account of the Plantation in Ulster at the Commencement of
the Seventeeth Century 1608 -1620&#8243;, by the Reverend George Hill. There is a specific reference to
Sir William Stewart on pages 322,323,522,533,544 and 545. (Note to File -JP Rhein)

"The following excerpts are taken from The Adair Manuscript section: In May 1642, about 10,000 troops from
the Scottish army were sent to Ireland by the Parliament of England. The Irish were rebelling and
reportedly encouraged by "the Popish clergy and the Bishop of Raphoe". The King committed the managing of
the war to the Parliament of England. The Presbyterian ministers were attempting to administer the
"solemn League and Covenant to the army," but the Mayor of Derry sent a Captain Hepburn to the ministers to
invite them to a conference in his chambers. "There he showed them a letter from the Parliament of England,
recommending to them the taking of the covenant when it should come to the Scotch army and withal, a
proclamation by those who then ruled in Dublin, prohibiting the taking of it and declared his great
straits what to choose." It appears that no decision was made and the ministers left him' They soon
"received another discouraging letter from Sir Robert Stewart, sent by Major Galbraith. It appears that
the Presbyterian ministers continued to preach and administer the covenant to the people, which
included many soldiers in the army. Mr. Phillips about Ballycastle (near Newtownlimabady), set himself
against it, and did endeavor to dissuade the garrison thereabout from it. And Sir Robert Stewart, with Mr.
Humphrey Galbraith, was using the same endeavours about Derry, having heard that the ministers were
coming there. Afterwards the ministers went towards Enniskillen `without sight of the enemy. For the
Irish, who were protected, hearing the covenant was coming that way, fled, because they heard that the
covenant was to extirpate all Papists, and was against protecting them."

They next went to Ramelton, where they received the rest of Sir William Stewart's regiment, and many of
Colonel Mervyn's, contrary to his threatenings. also, one of those who opposed the covenant at Raphoe
entered into it with apparent ingenuousness. From this place they returned to Derry, where Sir Robert
Stewart, Colonel Mervyn and Major James Galbraith came now to hear the ministers preach and explain the
covenant. A document dated on 14 December 1642, in the records of Fermanagh, Ireland: `The last true
Intelligence from Ireland; Being a true Relation of the great Victory lately obtained against the Rebels
by Sir William Stewart, Colonel Sanderson, Colonel Mervyn, and Sergeant Major Galbraith against the
great O'Neales and MacGwires Forces, wherein they slew great numbers of the Rebels, took 900 cows, 500
sheep, and 300 horses from the Rebels in the County of Fermanagh. Sir William Stewart understanding that a
party of Oneales in the Kirrilrs Woodes, sent out Captain Balfoure, a deserving soldier, with a hundred
men, who skirmished with them, killing fifty rebels, and lost but four of his own men, and took away four
hundred cows from the Rebels. Some four days after Sir William Stewart desired Lieutenant Colonel
Sanderson, Lieutenant Colonel Audley Mervin, and Sergeant-Major James Galbraith to march from
Newtowne to relieve Ageer and Aghatyan, with five hundred foot and a hundred horse." (Source – The
Redtower, Clan Galbraith Association International, Volume XX, No. 3, March 1999)

A copy of "The Stewarts" by Walter A. Stewart, 10 Durham Place, Chelsea, London, September 1, 1933, is filed
in the research files of J. P. Rhein, Volume 4, Packet D. This is a 49 page detailed document dealing with
these Stewarts in Ireland. It also contains several dissenting views as true line of descent of these
Stewarts. (Note to file JP Rhein)

"GEORGE CRAWFURD (or Crawford), a Scottish historian with a bent for genealogy, whose works were
published at Edinburgh in 1710 and around then, gave his opinion of the origin of the Mountjoy Stewarts in
Ireland, several generations after those Stewarts were settled there. Apparently he got his
information from conversations with fourth or fifth cousins of the Mountjoy branch-not from signed
documents nor, of course, contemporary witnesses. Crawford named Archibald Stewart of Fintalloch, in
Kirkcudbrightshire, but did niot trace his ancestry, because the descendants with whom he talked did not
know it themselves. They dimly knew that they were cadets of the Stewarts of Garlies, because the earls of
Galloway, who presented the eldest branch of that strain, were their super chiefs. 

In the reigns of William & Mary and Queen Anne, when Crawford worked, the fame of the Lords Mountjoy,
grandson and great-grandson of the first Sir William Stewart, was widespread. Anybody who could claim
relationship to them was proud to do so. The Stewarts of Fintalloch whom Crawford talked with included
particularly William Stewart of Culgruff, probably in Kirkcudbrightshire, secretary to the dukes of
Queensberry, for it was he who first rook an interest in the Fintalloch ancestry and hired a genealogist,
Rev. Andrew Symson, to look it up. This Willam Stewart of Culgruff was the eldest son of Archibald Stewart
of Culgruff, second son of John Stewart of Shambellie, in Dumfriesshire. John was a son of John Stewart of
Allans, son of John and Bessie (Newell) Stewart of Auchinleck. John was a younger son of Archibald
Stewart, jr. of Fintalloch, second son of Archibald and Elizabeth (Kennedy) Stewart of Fintalloch.
Archibald and Elizabeth's elder son was William, called Black William: he inherited the lease of
Fintalloch, married Janet Gordon but left no issue, and died July 24, 1595, at the court of Queen
Elizabeth. His brother Archibald succeeded to Fintalloch: he married a daughter of McLellan of Bombie
and had these children, as listed by Crawford – Richard, who succeeded to Fintalloch ; John of "Allans",
James, "ancestor of Archibald Stewart, the great Whig with the whiskers who lives in the Cowgate
(Edinburgh)"; Robert, "ancestor of the Lords Mountjoy in Ireland"; and Archibald "of Heisilside.
Crawford overlooked a son William and supposed that Robert, whose name, was quite as distinguished as
William's in the early settlement of Ulster, was the great-grandfather of the Lord Mountjoy of his
(Crawford's) time. He took a stab at it, and came as close as anybody could who depended on what he had
heard." (Source – Stewart Clan Magazine, Tome H, Volume 37, Number 6, December 1959)

THE PLANATION AND SETTLEMENT OF IRELAND

The following excerpts were taken from Irish and Scotch-Irish Ancestral Research Volume 1, Repositories
and Records, by Margaret Dickson Falley, B.S., published by Genealogical Publishing Col, Inc. 1981.

"On the whole, the Plantation and Settlement of Ireland carried out the principal object of the Crown and
the English Government (including that of the Commonwealth) over a period of one hundred and fifty years,
to eventually subjugate Ireland by confiscation, and plant the realm with new land-lords, loyal to the
State, who would supply revenue to the Government, maintain English law administered by
representatives from England, and furnish protection by locally supported military forces. Thus the
forfeitures of individual estates by "enemies of the State" are a part of the series of Plantation and
Settlement records which set forth the changes in ownership and tenure of Irish lands.

The Presbyterians in Ireland were largely Ulster Scots. During two and a half centuries after the first
plantation of Scottish Presbyterian colonies in Ulster, ca. 1606, they maintained a close connection
with their homeland, while they remained a race apart from their Irish and English neighbors. They were
hated by the Roman Catholics of Ulster, whose land they had usurped. They were despised by the English,
whose Government and Established Church inflicted persecution upon them due to religious non-conformity.

The Ulster Scots kept their racial strain pure in matters of intermarriage. They sent their sons to
Scotland to be educated for the ministry, etc. Many of them married there before they returned to Ulster.
Thus they remained under the influence of Scottish religion, philosophy, and family ties to their early
and some later generations.

While the Presbyterians who settled in Ulster were almost solidly Scottish, there were many English
Puritans of Calvinistic doctrine who settled in Dublin and the South of Ireland. The English type of
Presbyterianism lacked the more severe theology and discipline of the Scottish Church. Their
congreations in Leinster and Munster were the outgrowth of the English Puritans and Independents of the
Commonwealth period, left there without organization after the Restoration. These two sects united in
1696 and developed the Southern Association of the Presbyterian Church. This became the Presbytery of
Munster and a part of the General Synod.

Historians of Church and local off airs, and the genealogists, have preserved a wealth of published and
manuscript records regarding Presbyterian families and individuals. 

A few points which may puzzle genealogists will be clarified by a brief review of the history of the
Presbyterians and their problems, due to the laws of the realm regarding dissenters from the Established
Church of Ireland. This will show that less than half of the Presbyterian families were permanently
settled in Ireland before 1650. The Penal Laws and other Acts of Parliament, depriving Presbyterians of
religious and civil liberty, were during some periods more rigorously imposed in Scotland than in
Ireland, thus resulting in a large emigration to Ulster. At other times the Ulster Presbyterians were
more severely penalized, causing several ministers and many Church members to return to Scotland. At all
times until well into the eighteenth century, the religious laws and practices resulted in the entries of
many records of baptism, marriage and burial, in the Parish Registers of the Established Church.

The first wave of Presbyterian settlers come to Ulster as leasers of the numerous Scottish proprietors who
were granted estates by James I, 1605-1625. By patent of 16 April 1605, the northeast quarter of County
Down was granted to Hugh Montgomery and the northwest quarter was granted to James Hamilton. This
represented two-thirds of the estates forfeited by Con O'Neill, who later was forced to sell his
remaining lands to the benefit of Hamilton and Montgomery. The southern part of County Down remained in
Roman Catholic hands. The new proprietors were required by the Crown to live on their estates, build
houses, churches, and bring English or Scottish settlers as tenants, able to bear arms for the King, build
houses and develop their land. Hamilton and Montgomery brought emigrants from the Scottish counties of
Ayre, Renfrew, Wigtown, Dumfries and Kirkcudbright. They began coming in May 1606. By 1610, Montgomery
could muster 1,000 men for the King and in 1614, the two proprietors mustered 2,000 men, representing
about 10,000 Scots settled in County Down.

Sir Arthur Chicester received a large portion in the southern part of County Antrim. In 1603, he was granted
the "Castle of Belfast" and surrounding property. He soon afterward acquired land along Carrickfergus
Bay and to the north almost as far as Lough Larne. He at first settled an English colony around Belfast, but
before long the Scottish settlers predominated throughout the lower half of County Antrim. The upper
half had been in the hands of the Macdonnell clan since about 1580. Soon after 1607, the area was granted to
Randall Macdonnell who, in 1620, became the Earl of Antrim.

Scottish tenants also spread through his estates, being required to bear arms for the King and develop the
land. The flight of the Ulster Earls of Tyrone and Tyrcommel with their Chiefs who were confederates, on 14
September 1607, gave James I the opportunity to confiscate their lands for past and present treason. The
six counties of Armagh, Cavan, Donegal, Fermanagh, Londonderry, and Tyrone, were escheated to the
Crown. This great confiscation, of some 3,800,000 acres, lead to the carefully planned "Plantation of
Ulster" between 1608 and 1620. Of this land, about 1,500,000 acres were only partly fertile and largely
bog, forest, and mountain country. This was restored to the Irish Roman Catholic natives. Extensive
grants were reserved for the bishops and their incumbents of the Established Church. Trinity College,
Dublin, and other Royal Schools received about 20,000 acres. Land was also set aside for the corporate
towns, forts, etc. The remaining half million acres of the most fertile land was reserved for
colonization by English and Scottish settlers.

King James at first chose fifty-nine Scotsmen of high social standing and influence and nearly as many
Englishmen, together with fifty-six military officers or "servitors" and eight-six natives, as
undertakers who were to receive estates of 2,000 acres of less, in all counties but Londonderry which was
reserved for the Corporation of the City of London. Eventually, by 1630, some undertakers acquired as
much as 3,000 acres, and estates in County Londonderry came into private hands.

Through the influence of John Knox, the foundations of the Presbyterian Church were laid in Scotland and
the first General Assembly was called in 1560. James VI of Scotland who succeeded to the English throne as
James I, in 1603, was determined to strengthen the Established Church in Scotland. Melville, the leading
Presbyterian of the time, was imprisoned in the Tower of London, and the General Assembly was forbidden to
function. Presbyterian ministers and their adherents alike were severely persecuted by the bishops, to
bring them under Church control.

At the same time, King James was anxious for a large settlement of English and Scots in Ireland. The latter
came to Ulster for new land but also for religious liberty, attracted by the tolerant attitude maintained
there by the bishops. The new Confession of Faith, sanctioned by Parliament for the Plantation
Settlements, reconciled the differences between Anglicans and Presbyterians. It was Calvinistic in
doctrine and allowed Presbyterian ministers to serve as clergy in the parish churches according to their
own practices and beliefs. This encouraged the Scottish ministers to follow their countrymen to Ulster.

The easy cooperation of the bishops in Ulster changed after 1625, and the ministers preached under
increasing restrictions. This came about through the influence of William Laud, Archbishop of
Canterbury, over Charles I. They were determined to tighten the control of the Established Church and
this was reflected in Ireland.

To make matters worse, Wentworth (Earl of Strafford) was appointed to the Irish Vice-royalty and arrived
in Dublin in 1633. He and his government began a reign of terror for Roman Catholics and Presbyterians
alike. He followed Laud's policy to the letter. The earlier "Articles of Religion" were set aside and the
ministers were required to adopt a Confession of Faith embodying the Thirty-nine Articles of the Church
of England. He further ordered the Act of Uniformity to be enforced against the ministers. This declared
that every clergyman or minister celebrating any religious service other than that of the Established
Church, every layman assisting at such a service and every person who opposed the liturgy of the Church,
was liable on the third offense to confiscation of goods and imprisonment for life.

John M'Clelland, of Newtownards, was deposed but continued to preach, and was therefore excommunicated.

In 1636, Robert Blair, Robert Hamilton, John M'Clelland and John Livingstone organized a group of 140
Scottish settlers to emigrate to New England. They set sail in September, 1636, and when half way across,
were driven back by storms. The ministers, to escape arrest, fled to Scotland, accompanied by many of
their adherents. At this time Scotland had become a safe refuge.

The crowning blow to Ulster came in 1639 when the "Black Oath" was imposed. The clergy were required to read
it from their pulpits and the people were forced to swear on their knees, if over age sixteen, to obey the
King's commands and to abjure and renounce the Covenant. The clergy were ordered to report on every
Presbyterian in each parish. Some conformed. Landed proprietors such as the Hamiltons and the
Montgomerys betrayed their faith and joined the persecutors. Great numbers, who could re-establish
themselves in Scotland, returned there. As many as 500 at a time returned to Scotland for the Communion season.

This persecution and departure of many Scots from Ulster saved hundreds of lives during the Rebellion
which broke out in 1641. The Roman Catholics, determined to exterminate the English, also hated the
Presbyterians for settling on their forfeited land. They tortured and murdered thousands and drove
others out of their homes to die of privation. Reprisals by the settlers, and a Scottish army sent to
Ulster, were equally devastating.

Following the Rebellion, after 1652, the Presbyterians came from Scotland to Ulster in great numbers,
owing to the unsettled conditions while Cromwell was attacking the Scottish Royalists. Some, who had
fled Ulster during the early years of the Rebellion, returned after Scottish forces made their safety
more assured. When peace was established, Cromwell at first held the Presbyterians suspect for having
supported the Royalist cause. After a little time they were allowed to flourish and many of their
ministers were permitted to preach under ecclesiastical control of the new State Church. By 1658, there
were eighty congregations and seventy Presbyterian ministers organized into five Presbyteries and a
General Synod.

The Presbyterians who were in Ulster in 1659, if settled in one of the counties of Antrim, Armagh, Donegal,
Down, Fermanagh, Londonderry or Monaghan, are listed in A Census of Ireland, circa 1659, edited by Seamus
Pender, Dublin, 1939. Records for the counties of Cavan and Tyrone are omitted, due to the fact that the
original documents were not preserved.

Following the restoration of Charles II, in 1660, he who had pledged his loyalty to the Presbyterian Church
when Scotland crowned him king, soon after his father's execution in 1649, now betrayed his word. He and
his Parliament returned the Established Church to power. Its lands and churches, taken by the
Commonwealth Government, were restored to the extent they were owned in 1641, and the bishops with their
clergy regained their positions."
Person ID 
I0183 
McKinney and Stewart of

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-digest <at> yahoogroups.com 
    Templar-de-Rosemont-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Jon Presco | 17 Aug 2011 21:59
Picon
Favicon

Holy Blood

&#8592; Rose of the World ProphecySealed Letters From the Rose Fox &#8594;The Stewart Grail Line in America
Posted on August 16, 2011 by Royal Rosamond Press 

With the discovery of the Stewart-Preston line rooted in American politics for over two hundred years,
puts me in the catbird seat when it comes to the many books and websites that profess, and repute, a Holy
Bloodline descended from Jesus, and other sources. I do not need to promote, or defend my position,
because according to the pro and con rules, I am the ball in play, because I am kin to the Stewarts. No author
has come close to revealing how America can be, or, already has been taken over by this alleged bloodline.
As I type, thirty million evangelicals are trying to get Rick Perry and Michele Bachman elected to the
highest office in this nation – because they believe they have a special place in Jesus' divine family
design, that after the destruction of all world government – including this Democracy – will leave
them, and only them, as members of God-Jesus' kingdom. Indeed, they title themselves "His Children". I
will present evidence this is not the case.

Then there is Mitt Romney and the Mormon genealogies that are put together in order to bring many families
into the exclusive Mormon Family Kingdom where only they will rule – in the name of Jesus!

In my book that I am annointed to write, I will show you the prophetic writing I have put on the internet that
came true. There is a real chance the evangelical heresy will tople our government, beause they have
already severely disabled it. They are proving that beleifs that defy reality, can be devastating.
Indeed, the beliefs of the evangelicals calls for the desctruction of most of the world in what they prey
will occur – The Tribulation!

Jon Presco

Copyright 2011

Many fundamentalist Christians believe the Antichrist, prophesied in the Book of Revelation, plans to
present himself as descended from the Davidic line to bolster his false claim that he is the Jewish
Messiah. [32] The intention of such propaganda would be to influence the opinions, emotions, attitudes,
and behavior of Jews and philo-Semites to achieve his Satanic objectives. An increasing number of fringe
Christian eschatologists believe the Antichrist may also present himself as descended from the Jesus
bloodline to capitalize on growing adherence to the hypothesis in the general public.

A Jesus bloodline is a hypothetical sequence of lineal descendants of the historical Jesus and Mary
Magdalene, or some other woman, usually portrayed as his alleged wife or a hierodule. Differing and
contradictory versions of a Jesus bloodline hypothesis have been promoted by numerous books, websites
and films of non-fiction and fiction in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, which have almost all been
dismissed as works of pseudohistory and conspiracy theory. According to an overwhelming majority of
professional historians and scholars from related fields, there is no historical, biblical,
apocryphal, archaeological, genealogical or genetic evidence which supports this modern
hypothesis.[1] Hypothetical Jesus bloodlines should not be confused with the biblical genealogy of
Jesus or the historical relatives of Jesus and their descendants, who are known as the Desposyni.

In reaction to The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, The Da Vinci Code, and other controversial books, websites
and films on the same theme, a significant number of individuals in the late 20th and early 21st centuries
have adhered to a Jesus bloodline hypothesis despite its lack of substantiation. While some simply
entertain it as a novel intellectual proposition, others hold it as an established belief thought to be
authoritative and not to be disputed.[25] Prominent among the latter are those who expect a direct
descendant of Jesus will eventually emerge as a great man and become a messiah, a Great Monarch who rules a
Holy European Empire, during an event which they will interpret as a mystical second coming of
Christ.[26] 

The 2003 conspiracy fiction novel The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown accepted some of the above hypotheses as
being valid. Elements of some Jesus bloodline hypotheses were propounded by the 2007 documentary film
The Lost Tomb of Jesus by Simcha Jacobovici focusing on the Talpiot Tomb discovery,[15] which was also
published as a book entitled The Jesus Family Tomb.[16] In 2007 psychic medium Sylvia Browne released the
book "The Two Marys: The Hidden History of the Mother and Wife of Jesus", in which she tries to further
validate the possibility of Jesus and Mary Magdalene producing a family.[17] In the 2008 documentary
film Bloodline, Bruce Burgess, a filmmaker with an interest in the paranormal, claims to have found a
mummified corpse (of which is allegedly Mary Magdalene) in Rennes-le-Château, France, in what appears
to be a Templar burial, supposedly proving the existence of a Jesus bloodline. Burgess claims to be
currently working with the French government on a full scale excavation of the s

The eclectic spiritual views of these adherents are influenced by the writings of iconoclastic authors
from a wide range of perspectives. These writers often seek to challenge modern beliefs and institutions
through a re-interpretation of Christian history and mythology.[25] Some try to advance and understand
the equality of men and women spiritually by portraying Mary Magdalene as being the apostle of a Christian
feminism,[27] and even the personification of the mother goddess or sacred feminine,[28] usually
associating her with the Black Madonna.[29] Some wish the ceremony that celebrated the beginning of the
alleged marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene to be viewed as a "holy wedding"; and Jesus, Mary Magdalene,
and their alleged daughter, Sarah, to be viewed as a "holy family", in order to question traditional
gender roles and family values.[30] Almost all these claims are at odds with scholarly Christian
apologetics, and have been dismissed as being New Age Gnostic heresies.[1][31]

No mainstream Christian denomination has adhered to a Jesus bloodline hypothesis as a dogma or an object of
religious devotion since they maintain that Jesus, believed to be God the Son, was perpetually celibate,
continent and chaste, and metaphysically married to the Church; he died, was resurrected, ascended to
heaven, and will eventually return to earth, thereby making all Jesus bloodline hypotheses and related
messianic expectations impossible.[25]

Many fundamentalist Christians believe the Antichrist, prophesied in the Book of Revelation, plans to
present himself as descended from the Davidic line to bolster his false claim that he is the Jewish
Messiah. [32] The intention of such propaganda would be to influence the opinions, emotions, attitudes,
and behavior of Jews and philo-Semites to achieve his Satanic objectives. An increasing number of fringe
Christian eschatologists believe the Antichrist may also present himself as descended from the Jesus
bloodline to capitalize on growing adherence to the hypothesis in the general public

The Merovingians

This bloodline and its offshoots includes a long line of pharaohs in ancient Egypt, including Rameses II
(1295-1228 BC), who is considered to be the greatest pharaoh of all.

He was his country's master architect (sacred geometry) and his name can be found on almost every ancient
shrine. The gold mines of Nubia made him rich beyond the imagination. This bloodline also includes the
extraterrestrial-human hybrids who ruled Sumer, Babylon, Greece, and Troy, and which, today, rule the
world. 

One common link in this bloodline is Philip of Macedonia (382-336BC),who married Olympias, and their son
was Alexander the Great (356-323BC), a tyrant who plundered that key region of Greece, Persia, Syria,
Phoenicia, Egypt, Babylon, the former lands of Sumer, and across into India before dying in Babylon at the
age of 33.

During his rule of Egypt he founded the city of Alexandria, one the greatest centers for esoteric knowledge
in the ancient world. Alexander was taught by the Greek philosopher, Aristotle, who in turn was taught by
Plato and he by Socrates. The bloodline and the hidden advanced knowledge have always gone together. 

This key bloodline comes down through the most famous Egyptian queen, Cleopatra (60-30BC), who married
the most famous Roman Emperor, Julius Caesar, and bore him a son, who became Ptolemy XIV. 

She also bore twins with Mark Anthony, who has his own connections to this line and its many offshoots
This bloodline also connects to Herod the Great, the "Herod" of the Jesus stories, and continues to the
Roman Piso family who, as I explain in The Biggest Secret, wrote the Gospel stories and invented the
mythical figure called Jesus!!

The same bloodline includes Constantine the Great, the Roman Emperor who, in 325AD, turned Christianity,
based on his ancestors' stories, into the religion we know today
King Ferdinand of Spain and Queen Isabella of Castile, the sponsors of Christopher Columbus, who
instigated the horrific Spanish Inquisition (1478-1834) in which people were tortured and burned at the
stake for in any way questioning the basis of the religion their various ancestors had created
More than that, the most used version of the Bible was commissioned and sponsored by another strand in the
same bloodline, King James 1st of England

The bloodline relatives of the de Medicis and the House of Lorraine, Queen Isabella of Castile and King
Ferdinand of Spain, were also sponsors of Columbus when he "discovered" the Americas. 

This bloodline also includes:
1. the Habsburgs, the most powerful family in Europe under the Holy Roman Empire
2. Geoffrey Plantagenet and the Plantagenet royal dynasty in England
3. King John, who signed the Magna Carta
4. King Henry Ist, II, and III, who were extremely close to the Knights Templar, as was King John
5. Mary Stuart and the Stuart Dynasty, including King James Ist of England, sponsor of the King James
version of the Bible
6. King George Ist, II, and III
7. Edward Ist, II, and III, Queen Victoria
8. Edward VII
9. George V and VI
10. Queen Elizabeth II
11. Prince Charles and Elizabeth's other offspring, Anne, Andrew and Edward
12. Princes William and Harry from Charles' "marriage" to Princess Diana
13. US Presidents, George Washington, John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin Delano
Roosevelt, and George Bush are all named in the charts as strands of this bloodline
14. it was passed on to the year 2000 US presidential favorite, George W. Bush Jr., and his brother, Jeb Bush,
the Governor of Florida
In fact if you go deeply enough into the genealogical research you will find that ALL the presidents are from
this line.

Genealogical sources, like the New England Historical Genealogical Society and Burkes Peerage, have
shown that 33 of the 42 presidents to Clinton are related to Charlemagne and 19 are related to England's
Edward III, both of whom are of this bloodline.

A spokesman for Burkes Peerage, the bible of royal and aristocratic genealogy based in London, has said
that every presidential election since and including George Washington in 1789 has been won by the
candidate with the most royal genes. Now we can see how and why. United States presidents are not chosen by
ballot, they are chosen by blood! 

This same bloodline also includes:
key Scottish families like the Lords of Galloway and the Comyns
Marie-Louise of Austria, who married Napoleon Bonaparte
Kaiser Wilhelm II, the king of Germany at the time of the First World War
Maximilian, the Habsburg emperor of Mexico, who died in 1867
On and on it goes into country after country. This bloodline connects into every surviving royal family in
Europe, including King Juan Carlos of Spain and the Dutch, Swedish, and Danish royal lines. 

.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_bloodline

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/merovingians/merovingios_02.htm

THE GRAIL IS THE BLOODLINE OF JESUS CHRIST & THE GRAIL PRINCESS IS PRINCESS DIANA, THE DIRECT DESCENDANT OF
MEROVINGIAN KINGS & JESUS

…the 'secret' at the very heart of the Judaic-Merovignian-Stuart bloodline refers to the restoration of
that bloodline to the thrones of Europe. And the inevitable dismantling of masonic government and its
corporate breed of democracy as a result. We also contend that Diana was emerging as a prime contender to
figurehead this restoration – either as Queen or, more likely, as Queen Mother and adviser to the future
king (King William).

…she might have influenced Prince William to espouse the principles of `constitutional monarchy' once
he was king. The Windsors are not a constitutional monarchy; they are what is known as a parliamentary
monarchy. They owe their seat of power not to hereditary right, but to Parliament. Which means that they
are constrained by the dictates of Parliament and are thus unable to exercise their constitutional duty:
to uphold the rights of their subjects against the impostures and injustices perpetrated by Parliament.
The Stuarts are sworn to the system of constitutional monarchy by which they once ruled. …the
Stuarts-like the Merovingians before them; indeed, like Diana -are sworn to represent rather than
govern their subjects: to use their position to serve the people, rather than to use the people to serve
their position. Indeed, should they regain power, they are sworn to reinstitute this very system. And to
ensure that this system is upheld in a written constitution.

Like the Stuarts before her, she simply posed too great a threat to the current and wholly corrupt system of
corporate democracy headed up by the equally corrupt House of Windsor. Let us not forget that she was
perceived by the highest echelons of masonic government as a Grail Queen – a direct bloodline descendant
of, and a genetic throwback to, the signature of David and Solomon and Jesus, as well as the Merovingians
and the Stuarts. Thus she was seen as a latter-day embodiment of the 'secret' at the very heart of the
bloodline itself – which, as we have seen, refers to the restoration of that bloodline to the thrones of
Europe. Monumental issues are at stake here, not least the bid to create a European Superstate ruled by the
central banks and their major stockholders – the international financiers and industrialists who
constitute masonic government. Britain under a constitutional Stuart Monarchy – or any other
`bloodline' monarchy, a monarchy founded on the principles central to the Judaic-Merovingian-Stuart
bloodline – would pose an irrevocable threat to a corporately-governed, plutocratic Europe. …For
this reason alone Diana surely constituted the single biggest threat to the House Of Windsor

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-digest <at> yahoogroups.com 
    Templar-de-Rosemont-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Jon Presco | 17 Aug 2011 22:03
Picon
Favicon

House of Stewart in America

¡û Christine Rosamond BentonRose of the World Prophecy ¡úThe American House of Stewart
Posted on August 15, 2011 by Royal Rosamond Press 

On Sunday the fourteenth of August, I discovered that the Preston family married into the House of Stewart,
and thus my family are kin to this royal family that includes Princess Diana and her two sons, William and
Harry Windsor. Now I know why the Queen stayed at Blair House, and why John Breckenridge fled to England
after he lost the Civil War ¨C that the House of Stewart may have backed! This is huge! 

She was the daughter of William Stewart, 1st Viscount Mountjoy and Hon. Mary Coote.1,2 From 1692, her
married name became Preston.2 From 1709, her married name became Forbes. As a result of her marriage, Hon.
Mary Stewart was styled as Countess of Granard on 24 August 1734.
Children of Hon. Mary Stewart and Phineas Preston
Jane Preston+2 b. c 1690, d. a 12 Nov 1746
Mary Preston2 b. 1696, d. 1749
Colonel John Preston+2 b. 1699, d. 1747 

Jon Presco

Copyright 2011

http://thepeerage.com/p15313.htm

http://rosamondpress.wordpress.com/2011/08/15/christine-rosamond-benton/

http://www.mckinneyandstewart.com/genealogy/getperson.php?personID=I0183&tree=McKinneyandStewart

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Stewart

Sir William Stewart, 1st Bt.1
M, #24William Stewart, 1st Earl of Blessington

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
William Stewart, 1st Earl of Blessington (7 April 1709 ¨C 14 August 1769)[1] was an Anglo-Irish peer and
member of the House of Lords, styled The Honourable until 1728 and known as William Stewart, 3rd Viscount
Mountjoy from 1728 to 1745.
Sir William Stewart was born on 7 April 1709, the son of William Stewart, 2nd Viscount Mountjoy (1675-1727)
and Anne Boyle. He married Eleanor Fitzgerald, daughter of Robert Fitzgerald on 10 January 1733. They had
two children, William Stewart and Lionel Robert, both of whom died before their father.
He succeeded his father as Viscount Mountjoy on 10 January 1727. He was Grand Master of the Freemasons (in
Ireland) between 1738 and 1740. He was created Earl of Blessington on 7 December 1745, his mother having
been sister and sole heiress of Charles, 2nd and last Viscount Blesington. He was made Governor of County
Tyrone and in 1748, was sworn of the Privy Council of Ireland.
On his death in London on 14 August 1769 he was buried at Silchester in Hampshire. His peerages became
extinct, but his baronetcy was inherited by a distant cousin, Sir Annesley Stewart

The House of Stewart (also known as the House of Stuart) is a European royal house. Founded by Robert II of
Scotland, the Stewarts first became monarchs of the Kingdom of Scotland during the late 14th century, and
subsequently held the position of the Kings of Great Britain and Ireland. Their direct ancestors (from
Brittany) had held the title High Steward of Scotland since the 12th century, after arriving by way of
Norman England. The dynasty inherited further territory by the 17th century which covered the entire
British Isles, including the Kingdom of England and Kingdom of Ireland, also upholding a claim to the
Kingdom of France.
In total, nine Stewart monarchs ruled just Scotland from 1371 until 1603. After this there was a Union of the
Crowns under James VI & I who had become the senior genealogical claimant to all of the holdings of the
extinct House of Tudor. Thus there were six Stuart monarchs who ruled both England and Scotland as well as
Ireland (although the Stuart era was interrupted by an interregnum lasting from 1649¨C1660, as a result
of the English Civil War). Additionally at the foundation of the Kingdom of Great Britain after the Acts of
Union, which politically united England and Scotland, the first monarch was Anne of Great Britain. After
her death, all the holdings passed to the House of Hanover, under the terms of the Act of Settlement 1701.
4

Last Edited=19 Jan 2009
     His will was probated in 1647.2
     Sir William Stewart, 1st Bt. was Captain of the company of 100 Scottish soldiers in June 1608 in Ireland.2 He
was invested as a Knight in 1613.2 He was created 1st Baronet Stewart, of Ramalton, co. Donegal [Ireland]
in 1623.1
Children of Sir William Stewart, 1st Bt.
Anne Stewart+1
Sir Alexander Stewart, 2nd Bt.+2 d. 3 Sep 1650

Mary Stewart1
F, #27914, b. circa 1677, d. 4 October 1765
Hon. Mary Stewart|b. c 1677\nd. 4 Oct 1765|p2792.htm#i27914|William Stewart, 1st Viscount
Mountjoy||p2792.htm#i27913|Hon. Mary Coote||p25242.htm#i252415|Sir Alexander Stewart, 2nd
Bt.|d. 3 Sep 1650|p33068.htm#i330678|Catherine Newcomen|d. 8 Dec 1714|p15262.htm#i152616|Richard
Coote, 1st Lord Coote, Baron of Coloony|b. 1620\nd. 10 Jul 1683|p12954.htm#i129532|Mary St. George|d.
5 Nov 1701|p12954.htm#i129533|

Last Edited=19 Jan 2009
     Hon. Mary Stewart was born circa 1677.2 She married, firstly, Phineas Preston in 1692 at Mountjoy,
Ireland.2,1 She married, secondly, Vice-Admiral George Forbes, 3rd Earl of Granard, son of Arthur
Forbes, 2nd Earl of Granard and Mary Rawdon, in 1709.1 She died on 4 October 1765.1 She was also reported to
have died on 4 October 1758.2
     She was the daughter of William Stewart, 1st Viscount Mountjoy and Hon. Mary Coote.1,2 From 1692, her
married name became Preston.2 From 1709, her married name became Forbes. As a result of her marriage, Hon.
Mary Stewart was styled as Countess of Granard on 24 August 1734.
Children of Hon. Mary Stewart and Phineas Preston
Jane Preston+2 b. c 1690, d. a 12 Nov 1746
Mary Preston2 b. 1696, d. 1749
Colonel John Preston+2 b. 1699, d. 1747
Nathaniel Preston2 b. c 1700
Children of Hon. Mary Stewart and Vice-Admiral George Forbes, 3rd Earl of Granard
Lady Mary Forbes1 d. 27 Nov 1797
Lt.-Gen. George Forbes, 4th Earl of Granard+1 b. 15 Mar 1710, d. 16 Oct 1769

Find
Surnames
Bookmarks
Places
Dates
Cemeteries
Search People
Search Families
Media
Photos
Documents
Headstones
Histories
Recordings
Videos
Albums
All Media
Info
What¡¯s New
Most Wanted
Reports
Statistics
Notes
Sources
Repositories
Contact Us

 
Sir William Stewart
Abt 1582 ¨C 1646

Home    Search    Print    Add Bookmark
Individual
Ancestors
Descendants
Relationship
Timeline
Suggest
Personal Information    |    Media    |    Sources    |    All    |    PDF 

Birth 
Abt 1582 
Wigtownshire, Scotland   [1] 
Gender 
Male 
Education 
1613 
Knighted   [2] 
_FA2 
2 May 1623 
Erected a Baronet of Ireland   [2] 
Died 
1646 
Ireland  
Will 
28 Jul 1647 
Will proven  
Notes 
THE STEWARTS IN IRELAND 

¡°Amongst the many branches of the Stewart family that have been transplanted out of Scotland, there
have been few that have attained to the degree of wealth and influence which this line of Ulster Stewarts
reached in the 17th and 18th centuries. The principal seat was formerly at Newtown-Stewart, County
Tyrone, which takes its name from Sir William Stewart, 1st Baronet, who was its founder, and the ruins of
the castle of his descendants, the Lords Mountjoy, in the Elizabethan style though not dating back
earlier than the middle of the 17th century, are still a picturesque feature of this beautifully situated
little Ulster town.

Sir William first went to Ireland, as Captain Stewart, in the year 1608, as evidenced by the following entry
in the register of the Privy Council of Scotland:

Edinburgh,
June 21, 1608.

Letter from the Council to the Governor of Knockfergus: Having ressavit directioun from our most sacred
Soveraigne, the Mngis Majestie, to send over tua hundreth men of warr for assisting and furthering his
Majisteis service ¡°in that Kingdome . . . we have accordingly sent thame unto you under the charge of
thir two gentilmen, Capitane Patrik Craufurde and Capitane Williame Stewart¡±.

¡°In the following year Captain Stewart was strongly recommended by the King to the Lord Deputy of
Ireland for special favour in the distribution of lands, at the Plantation of Ulster. A despatch to the
Lord Deputy, in State Papers, Irish Series, bearing date 19th June 1609, conveys the message that His
Majesty desires ¡± extraordinary respect to be shown to him (Captain Stewart) when the distribution
shall come It so that . . . he may therein be regarded before another¡±. 

Captain Stewart¡¯s name was, accordingly, included in the list of ¡± Servitors ¡± (i.e., persons in
the Government service) recommended for grants of land at the Plantation, and on 30th November 1610, he
was vested by Letters Patent with a it proportion¡± of 1,000 acres along the western shore of the upper
part of Lough Swilly, Co. Donegal. This property was erected into the Manor of Stewart¡¯s Fort, and on it
Captain Stewart constructed a fortified dwelling known by the name of Fort-Stewart,¡± which became
the residence of his youngest son, Thomas Stewart, and the latter¡¯s descendants till about the year
1780, when Sir Annesley Stewart, 6th Baronet, who had become head of the family in 1769, acquired a more
commodious and modern type of residence, known as Brookehill, within a mile or two of the old fortified
house. He changed the name of ¡°Brookehill¡± to ¡± Fort-Stewart,¡± and this house remains the
residence of his successor in the fourth generation, Sir H. J. U. Stewart, present and Ilth Baronet.

Captain Nicholas Pynnar¡¯s Survey 1618 of the Land Grants in the year 1608 in the Barony of Raphoe list
William Stewart, brother of Lord Garlies, as receiving 1,500 acres in the Precint of Boilage and Banagh.
County Donegal on the Net, list William Stewart, Esq. as receiving a land grant in the year 1608 in the
Barony of Boylagh, County Donegal. (I am unable to explain the descrepancy in dates, locations and
acreage. (Note to File ¨C JPRhein)

A further letter from the King recommending Captain Stewart to the special attention of the Lord Deputy is
in State Papers, Irish Series, under date of 26th January 1612-13, and this led to his being granted an
additional proportion of 1500 acres in the Barony of Strabane, Co. Tyrone, which had been surrendered by
the original grantee. He subsequently acquired, either by grant or purchase, further lands of large
extent in the counties of Tyrone and Donegal. To his lands in the Barony of Strabane, Co. Tyrone, he gave the
name of Newtown-Stewart estate; those in the Barony of Clogher in the same county, became the
Mount-Stewart estate; and those in the Barony of Kilmacrenan, Co. Donegal, were designated the
Ramelton, Fanad, and Fort-Stewart estates. On the Mount-Stewart property he built the great castle of
Aughentaine, which was destroyed during the disturbances which broke out in 1641. Mount-Stewart was
officially renamed Fivemiletown about the beginning of the 19th century, and it figures under the latter
name on present day maps. The ruins of Aughentaine Castle are shown a short distance to the north.

Captain Stewart was knighted at Royston in 1613, and was created a Baronet of Ireland in 1623. He played a
large part in civil and military affairs in Ireland till his death late in 1646, and was a member of the Privy
Council and a General in the army. He was succeeded as 2nd Baronet by his eldest son, Sir Alexander Stewart.
The latter, besides being a military commander of considerable repute, wa¡¯s a zealous Covenanter,
and is described in Patrick Adair¡¯s True Narrative of the Presbyterian Church in Ireland, 1623-1670,
as ¡± a gentleman of great integrity and fervent in propagating the gospel interest in the districts
around Derry.¡± Sir Alexander is chiefly known to history for having conducted the First Siege of Derry
in the year 1649, when the city was held for the English Parliament by Sir Charles Coote.¡± (Source ¨C
The Stewarts, Volume VI, The Stewarts In Ireland, Walter A. Stewart, London, S.W. 3, September 1, 1933)

The Right Honorable Sir William Stewart, 1st Baronet of Newtownstewart, County Tyrone, and Ramelton,
County Donegal, went over to Ireland in 1608 as Captain commanding a company of Scottish troops sent to
serve in that country. ( See Register of the Privy Council of Scotland, June 21, 1608) He is stated by
Douglas of Glenbervied in his ¡°Historical and Genealogical Tree of Royal Family of Scotland and name
of Stewart¡±, 1750 to have been a son of Archibald Stewart, 3rd laird of Fintalloch, who died around 1506
(On review this date may have been incorrectly copied by J.P. Rhein or it is incorrect. This will have to be
checked further.) and whose family descended from Sir William Stewart, 2nd of Garlies (see Galloway
Earl). (Source ¨C Burke¡¯s Peerage and Baronetage)

Sir William Stewart was in great favor with King James VI, who in 1610 granted him 1,000 acres in the barony of
Kilmacrean in County Donegal, Ireland, for the plantation of escheated lands in Ulster. William was a
member of the privy council of King James VI and of King Charles I. He was a very prominent man in northern
Ireland. He led the Ulster forces during the Irish rebellion of 1641 and decisively defeated Sir Phelim
O¡¯Neill on June 16, 1642. Sir William resided at Aughentean and Newtown-Stewart, County Tyrone.
Among his many possessions was a demesne of 300 acres in County Donegal, upon which he built in 1618 a four
story castle, called Ramelton, and a town consisting of 45 houses. (Source ¨C Stewart Clan Magazine,
Volume XI-XV, 1933-1938, page 141)

Sir William Stewart in 1613 bought 1,500 acres granted in 1610 to James Haig, gentleman, in the precinct of
Strabane, County Tyrone. (Source ¨C Stewart Clan Magazine, Volume XI-XV, 1933-1938, page 118)

¡°William Stewart, 1st Baronet Ramelton, started out as Captain William Stewart of Whithorn. He was
granted lands under the Plantation scheme as a Servitor rather than an Undertaker, in reward for his
military service in Ireland under King James I of England. He was granted ¡®Gortavagie¡¯ by James and
also he received ¡®Ramelton¡¯ which had originally been granted to Sir Richard Hansard. Shortly
thereafter he also took over the lands in County Tyrone of James Haig, which eventually became known as
Newtownstewart, and later still land in Clogher Barony; also in County Tyrone, which he renamed Mount
Stewart and which is now known as Fivemiletown. He married Frances Newcomen, and was knighted in 1623. He
was made a Baronet of Ramelton in 1623 and died in 1646¡å (Source ¨C Mary Stewart Kyritsis)

¡°Sir William Stewart emigrated to Ireland during the planation of Ulster, in the time of King James VI of
Scotland who inherited the English throne as James I of England. Sir William married Frances Newcomer,
daughter of Sir Robert Newcomer of Mosstown, County Longford. He sat in the Irish parliament for County
Donegal in 1613-1615, and was created a baronet on May 2, 1623. He served with distinction against the
Irish rebels in 1641 and 1642. He had at least two sons.¡± (Source ¨C Letter from Mary Hazeltine Cole)

¡°James I (of England) (1566-1625), king of England (1603-1625) and, as James VI, king of Scotland
(1567-1625). Born in Edinburgh Castle, Scotland, James was the only son of Mary, Queen of Scots. When Mary
was forced to abdicate in 1567, he was proclaimed king of Scotland. He assumed actual rule in 1581.
Scotland was at that time divided by conflict between the Protestants and the Roman Catholics. James
tried unsuccessfully to advance the cause of religious peace in Europe, but he repressed both Catholics
and Protestants at various times. In 1586 James formed an alliance with his cousin, Queen Elizabeth I of
England. He replaced the feudal power of the nobility with a strong central government, and maintaining
the divine right of kings, he enforced the superiority of the state over the church. In 1603 James
succeeded Queen Elizabeth as James I, the first Stuart king of England. His belief in divine right led to
prolonged conflict with Parliament. James authorized a new translation of the Bible, generally called
the King James Version. James I was succeeded to the throne by his son, Charles I.¡± (Source ¨C The
Encarta 99 Desk Encyclopedia Copyright 1998 Microsoft Corporation) 

¡°After the first shock of the rebellion and the initial frantic defence measures, the Protestants
began to hit back. For example, volunteers from the Laggan district, County Donegal, near Londonderry,
launched a counter-attack in early summer 1642, organized by two brothers and professional soldiers,
Sir William and Sir Robert Stewart. The Laggin men swiftly recaptured Strabane; relieved Lemavady,
destroyed rebel bands in the Magilligan Peninsula, swept through Roe Valley and at the Gelvin Burn near
Dungiven finally, relieving Colerain .¡± (Source ¨C Ulster¡¯s Defence Tradition by Robert K. Campbell)

¡°The plantation of Ulster was fully planned by the English and Scottish Privy Councils in 1610. Land was
assigned to British undertakers during April and May. Undertakers had to be in residence by September
1610, and to have fulfilled their conditions of settlement by Easter 1613. The enterprise attracted
those pressed hard by the cost of living, in Scotland as well as England.¡± (Source ¨C Modern Ireland
1600-1972 by R. F. Foster)

¡°In 1600, Ulster was synonymous with wildness and untamed Gaelicism: separate by nature and
geography, least inhabited, least developed economically, least urbanized. Less than two percent of
the population of Ireland was of Scots or English descent; but by the early 1700s the proportion had soared
to 27 percent.¡± (Source ¨C Modern Ireland 1600-1972 by R. F.Foster)

See Links Section on this site for ¡°An Historical Account of the Plantation in Ulster at the
Commencement of the Seventeeth Century 1608 -1620¡å, by the Reverend George Hill. There is a specific
reference to Sir William Stewart on pages 322,323,522,533,544 and 545. (Note to File -JP Rhein)

¡°The following excerpts are taken from The Adair Manuscript section: In May 1642, about 10,000 troops
from the Scottish army were sent to Ireland by the Parliament of England. The Irish were rebelling and
reportedly encouraged by ¡°the Popish clergy and the Bishop of Raphoe¡±. The King committed the
managing of the war to the Parliament of England. The Presbyterian ministers were attempting to
administer the ¡°solemn League and Covenant to the army,¡± but the Mayor of Derry sent a Captain
Hepburn to the ministers to invite them to a conference in his chambers. ¡°There he showed them a letter
from the Parliament of England, recommending to them the taking of the covenant when it should come to the
Scotch army and withal, a proclamation by those who then ruled in Dublin, prohibiting the taking of it and
declared his great straits what to choose.¡± It appears that no decision was made and the ministers left
him¡¯ They soon ¡°received another discouraging letter from Sir Robert Stewart, sent by Major
Galbraith. It appears that the Presbyterian ministers continued to preach and administer the covenant
to the people, which included many soldiers in the army. Mr. Phillips about Ballycastle (near
Newtownlimabady), set himself against it, and did endeavor to dissuade the garrison thereabout from it.
And Sir Robert Stewart, with Mr. Humphrey Galbraith, was using the same endeavours about Derry, having
heard that the ministers were coming there. Afterwards the ministers went towards Enniskillen
¡®without sight of the enemy. For the Irish, who were protected, hearing the covenant was coming that
way, fled, because they heard that the covenant was to extirpate all Papists, and was against protecting them.¡±

They next went to Ramelton, where they received the rest of Sir William Stewart¡¯s regiment, and many of
Colonel Mervyn¡¯s, contrary to his threatenings. also, one of those who opposed the covenant at Raphoe
entered into it with apparent ingenuousness. From this place they returned to Derry, where Sir Robert
Stewart, Colonel Mervyn and Major James Galbraith came now to hear the ministers preach and explain the
covenant. A document dated on 14 December 1642, in the records of Fermanagh, Ireland: ¡®The last true
Intelligence from Ireland; Being a true Relation of the great Victory lately obtained against the Rebels
by Sir William Stewart, Colonel Sanderson, Colonel Mervyn, and Sergeant Major Galbraith against the
great O¡¯Neales and MacGwires Forces, wherein they slew great numbers of the Rebels, took 900 cows, 500
sheep, and 300 horses from the Rebels in the County of Fermanagh. Sir William Stewart understanding that a
party of Oneales in the Kirrilrs Woodes, sent out Captain Balfoure, a deserving soldier, with a hundred
men, who skirmished with them, killing fifty rebels, and lost but four of his own men, and took away four
hundred cows from the Rebels. Some four days after Sir William Stewart desired Lieutenant Colonel
Sanderson, Lieutenant Colonel Audley Mervin, and Sergeant-Major James Galbraith to march from
Newtowne to relieve Ageer and Aghatyan, with five hundred foot and a hundred horse.¡± (Source ¨C The
Redtower, Clan Galbraith Association International, Volume XX, No. 3, March 1999)

A copy of ¡°The Stewarts¡± by Walter A. Stewart, 10 Durham Place, Chelsea, London, September 1, 1933,
is filed in the research files of J. P. Rhein, Volume 4, Packet D. This is a 49 page detailed document dealing
with these Stewarts in Ireland. It also contains several dissenting views as true line of descent of these
Stewarts. (Note to file JP Rhein)

¡°GEORGE CRAWFURD (or Crawford), a Scottish historian with a bent for genealogy, whose works were
published at Edinburgh in 1710 and around then, gave his opinion of the origin of the Mountjoy Stewarts in
Ireland, several generations after those Stewarts were settled there. Apparently he got his
information from conversations with fourth or fifth cousins of the Mountjoy branch-not from signed
documents nor, of course, contemporary witnesses. Crawford named Archibald Stewart of Fintalloch, in
Kirkcudbrightshire, but did niot trace his ancestry, because the descendants with whom he talked did not
know it themselves. They dimly knew that they were cadets of the Stewarts of Garlies, because the earls of
Galloway, who presented the eldest branch of that strain, were their super chiefs. 

In the reigns of William & Mary and Queen Anne, when Crawford worked, the fame of the Lords Mountjoy,
grandson and great-grandson of the first Sir William Stewart, was widespread. Anybody who could claim
relationship to them was proud to do so. The Stewarts of Fintalloch whom Crawford talked with included
particularly William Stewart of Culgruff, probably in Kirkcudbrightshire, secretary to the dukes of
Queensberry, for it was he who first rook an interest in the Fintalloch ancestry and hired a genealogist,
Rev. Andrew Symson, to look it up. This Willam Stewart of Culgruff was the eldest son of Archibald Stewart
of Culgruff, second son of John Stewart of Shambellie, in Dumfriesshire. John was a son of John Stewart of
Allans, son of John and Bessie (Newell) Stewart of Auchinleck. John was a younger son of Archibald
Stewart, jr. of Fintalloch, second son of Archibald and Elizabeth (Kennedy) Stewart of Fintalloch.
Archibald and Elizabeth¡¯s elder son was William, called Black William: he inherited the lease of
Fintalloch, married Janet Gordon but left no issue, and died July 24, 1595, at the court of Queen
Elizabeth. His brother Archibald succeeded to Fintalloch: he married a daughter of McLellan of Bombie
and had these children, as listed by Crawford ¨C Richard, who succeeded to Fintalloch ; John of
¡°Allans¡±, James, ¡°ancestor of Archibald Stewart, the great Whig with the whiskers who lives in
the Cowgate (Edinburgh)¡±; Robert, ¡°ancestor of the Lords Mountjoy in Ireland¡±; and Archibald
¡°of Heisilside. Crawford overlooked a son William and supposed that Robert, whose name, was quite as
distinguished as William¡¯s in the early settlement of Ulster, was the great-grandfather of the Lord
Mountjoy of his (Crawford¡¯s) time. He took a stab at it, and came as close as anybody could who depended
on what he had heard.¡± (Source ¨C Stewart Clan Magazine, Tome H, Volume 37, Number 6, December 1959)

THE PLANATION AND SETTLEMENT OF IRELAND

The following excerpts were taken from Irish and Scotch-Irish Ancestral Research Volume 1, Repositories
and Records, by Margaret Dickson Falley, B.S., published by Genealogical Publishing Col, Inc. 1981.

¡°On the whole, the Plantation and Settlement of Ireland carried out the principal object of the Crown
and the English Government (including that of the Commonwealth) over a period of one hundred and fifty
years, to eventually subjugate Ireland by confiscation, and plant the realm with new land-lords, loyal
to the State, who would supply revenue to the Government, maintain English law administered by
representatives from England, and furnish protection by locally supported military forces. Thus the
forfeitures of individual estates by ¡°enemies of the State¡± are a part of the series of Plantation
and Settlement records which set forth the changes in ownership and tenure of Irish lands.

The Presbyterians in Ireland were largely Ulster Scots. During two and a half centuries after the first
plantation of Scottish Presbyterian colonies in Ulster, ca. 1606, they maintained a close connection
with their homeland, while they remained a race apart from their Irish and English neighbors. They were
hated by the Roman Catholics of Ulster, whose land they had usurped. They were despised by the English,
whose Government and Established Church inflicted persecution upon them due to religious non-conformity.

The Ulster Scots kept their racial strain pure in matters of intermarriage. They sent their sons to
Scotland to be educated for the ministry, etc. Many of them married there before they returned to Ulster.
Thus they remained under the influence of Scottish religion, philosophy, and family ties to their early
and some later generations.

While the Presbyterians who settled in Ulster were almost solidly Scottish, there were many English
Puritans of Calvinistic doctrine who settled in Dublin and the South of Ireland. The English type of
Presbyterianism lacked the more severe theology and discipline of the Scottish Church. Their
congreations in Leinster and Munster were the outgrowth of the English Puritans and Independents of the
Commonwealth period, left there without organization after the Restoration. These two sects united in
1696 and developed the Southern Association of the Presbyterian Church. This became the Presbytery of
Munster and a part of the General Synod.

Historians of Church and local off airs, and the genealogists, have preserved a wealth of published and
manuscript records regarding Presbyterian families and individuals. 

A few points which may puzzle genealogists will be clarified by a brief review of the history of the
Presbyterians and their problems, due to the laws of the realm regarding dissenters from the Established
Church of Ireland. This will show that less than half of the Presbyterian families were permanently
settled in Ireland before 1650. The Penal Laws and other Acts of Parliament, depriving Presbyterians of
religious and civil liberty, were during some periods more rigorously imposed in Scotland than in
Ireland, thus resulting in a large emigration to Ulster. At other times the Ulster Presbyterians were
more severely penalized, causing several ministers and many Church members to return to Scotland. At all
times until well into the eighteenth century, the religious laws and practices resulted in the entries of
many records of baptism, marriage and burial, in the Parish Registers of the Established Church.

The first wave of Presbyterian settlers come to Ulster as leasers of the numerous Scottish proprietors who
were granted estates by James I, 1605-1625. By patent of 16 April 1605, the northeast quarter of County
Down was granted to Hugh Montgomery and the northwest quarter was granted to James Hamilton. This
represented two-thirds of the estates forfeited by Con O¡¯Neill, who later was forced to sell his
remaining lands to the benefit of Hamilton and Montgomery. The southern part of County Down remained in
Roman Catholic hands. The new proprietors were required by the Crown to live on their estates, build
houses, churches, and bring English or Scottish settlers as tenants, able to bear arms for the King, build
houses and develop their land. Hamilton and Montgomery brought emigrants from the Scottish counties of
Ayre, Renfrew, Wigtown, Dumfries and Kirkcudbright. They began coming in May 1606. By 1610, Montgomery
could muster 1,000 men for the King and in 1614, the two proprietors mustered 2,000 men, representing
about 10,000 Scots settled in County Down.

Sir Arthur Chicester received a large portion in the southern part of County Antrim. In 1603, he was granted
the ¡°Castle of Belfast¡± and surrounding property. He soon afterward acquired land along
Carrickfergus Bay and to the north almost as far as Lough Larne. He at first settled an English colony
around Belfast, but before long the Scottish settlers predominated throughout the lower half of County
Antrim. The upper half had been in the hands of the Macdonnell clan since about 1580. Soon after 1607, the
area was granted to Randall Macdonnell who, in 1620, became the Earl of Antrim.

Scottish tenants also spread through his estates, being required to bear arms for the King and develop the
land. The flight of the Ulster Earls of Tyrone and Tyrcommel with their Chiefs who were confederates, on 14
September 1607, gave James I the opportunity to confiscate their lands for past and present treason. The
six counties of Armagh, Cavan, Donegal, Fermanagh, Londonderry, and Tyrone, were escheated to the
Crown. This great confiscation, of some 3,800,000 acres, lead to the carefully planned ¡°Plantation
of Ulster¡± between 1608 and 1620. Of this land, about 1,500,000 acres were only partly fertile and
largely bog, forest, and mountain country. This was restored to the Irish Roman Catholic natives.
Extensive grants were reserved for the bishops and their incumbents of the Established Church. Trinity
College, Dublin, and other Royal Schools received about 20,000 acres. Land was also set aside for the
corporate towns, forts, etc. The remaining half million acres of the most fertile land was reserved for
colonization by English and Scottish settlers.

King James at first chose fifty-nine Scotsmen of high social standing and influence and nearly as many
Englishmen, together with fifty-six military officers or ¡°servitors¡± and eight-six natives, as
undertakers who were to receive estates of 2,000 acres of less, in all counties but Londonderry which was
reserved for the Corporation of the City of London. Eventually, by 1630, some undertakers acquired as
much as 3,000 acres, and estates in County Londonderry came into private hands.

Through the influence of John Knox, the foundations of the Presbyterian Church were laid in Scotland and
the first General Assembly was called in 1560. James VI of Scotland who succeeded to the English throne as
James I, in 1603, was determined to strengthen the Established Church in Scotland. Melville, the leading
Presbyterian of the time, was imprisoned in the Tower of London, and the General Assembly was forbidden to
function. Presbyterian ministers and their adherents alike were severely persecuted by the bishops, to
bring them under Church control.

At the same time, King James was anxious for a large settlement of English and Scots in Ireland. The latter
came to Ulster for new land but also for religious liberty, attracted by the tolerant attitude maintained
there by the bishops. The new Confession of Faith, sanctioned by Parliament for the Plantation
Settlements, reconciled the differences between Anglicans and Presbyterians. It was Calvinistic in
doctrine and allowed Presbyterian ministers to serve as clergy in the parish churches according to their
own practices and beliefs. This encouraged the Scottish ministers to follow their countrymen to Ulster.

The easy cooperation of the bishops in Ulster changed after 1625, and the ministers preached under
increasing restrictions. This came about through the influence of William Laud, Archbishop of
Canterbury, over Charles I. They were determined to tighten the control of the Established Church and
this was reflected in Ireland.

To make matters worse, Wentworth (Earl of Strafford) was appointed to the Irish Vice-royalty and arrived
in Dublin in 1633. He and his government began a reign of terror for Roman Catholics and Presbyterians
alike. He followed Laud¡¯s policy to the letter. The earlier ¡°Articles of Religion¡± were set
aside and the ministers were required to adopt a Confession of Faith embodying the Thirty-nine Articles
of the Church of England. He further ordered the Act of Uniformity to be enforced against the ministers.
This declared that every clergyman or minister celebrating any religious service other than that of the
Established Church, every layman assisting at such a service and every person who opposed the liturgy of
the Church, was liable on the third offense to confiscation of goods and imprisonment for life.

John M¡¯Clelland, of Newtownards, was deposed but continued to preach, and was therefore excommunicated.

In 1636, Robert Blair, Robert Hamilton, John M¡¯Clelland and John Livingstone organized a group of 140
Scottish settlers to emigrate to New England. They set sail in September, 1636, and when half way across,
were driven back by storms. The ministers, to escape arrest, fled to Scotland, accompanied by many of
their adherents. At this time Scotland had become a safe refuge.

The crowning blow to Ulster came in 1639 when the ¡°Black Oath¡± was imposed. The clergy were required
to read it from their pulpits and the people were forced to swear on their knees, if over age sixteen, to obey
the King¡¯s commands and to abjure and renounce the Covenant. The clergy were ordered to report on every
Presbyterian in each parish. Some conformed. Landed proprietors such as the Hamiltons and the
Montgomerys betrayed their faith and joined the persecutors. Great numbers, who could re-establish
themselves in Scotland, returned there. As many as 500 at a time returned to Scotland for the Communion season.

This persecution and departure of many Scots from Ulster saved hundreds of lives during the Rebellion
which broke out in 1641. The Roman Catholics, determined to exterminate the English, also hated the
Presbyterians for settling on their forfeited land. They tortured and murdered thousands and drove
others out of their homes to die of privation. Reprisals by the settlers, and a Scottish army sent to
Ulster, were equally devastating.

Following the Rebellion, after 1652, the Presbyterians came from Scotland to Ulster in great numbers,
owing to the unsettled conditions while Cromwell was attacking the Scottish Royalists. Some, who had
fled Ulster during the early years of the Rebellion, returned after Scottish forces made their safety
more assured. When peace was established, Cromwell at first held the Presbyterians suspect for having
supported the Royalist cause. After a little time they were allowed to flourish and many of their
ministers were permitted to preach under ecclesiastical control of the new State Church. By 1658, there
were eighty congregations and seventy Presbyterian ministers organized into five Presbyteries and a
General Synod.

The Presbyterians who were in Ulster in 1659, if settled in one of the counties of Antrim, Armagh, Donegal,
Down, Fermanagh, Londonderry or Monaghan, are listed in A Census of Ireland, circa 1659, edited by Seamus
Pender, Dublin, 1939. Records for the counties of Cavan and Tyrone are omitted, due to the fact that the
original documents were not preserved.

Following the restoration of Charles II, in 1660, he who had pledged his loyalty to the Presbyterian Church
when Scotland crowned him king, soon after his father¡¯s execution in 1649, now betrayed his word. He
and his Parliament returned the Established Church to power. Its lands and churches, taken by the
Commonwealth Government, were restored to the extent they were owned in 1641, and the bishops with their
clergy regained their positions.¡±
Person ID 
I0183 
McKinney and Stewart of Clarion County, Pennsylvania
Last Modified 
20 May 2010 

Father 
Archibald Stewart of Barclyee, Wigtownshire,   b. Abt 1550 
Family ID 
F0126 
Group Sheet

Family 
Frances Newcomen 
Married 
Abt 1610  [1] 
Children 

1. Catherine Stewart
>
2. Sir Alexander Stewart,   b. Abt 1616,   d. 3 Sep 1650, Killed at the battle of Dunbar, fighting on the royalist
side against Cromwell.

3. John Stewart,   b. Abt 1618,   d. Oct 1649, Put to death after trying to escape from the defenders of
Londonderry, Ireland

4. Robert Stewart,   b. Abt 1622

5. William Stewart,   b. Abt 1626
>
6. Thomas Stewart,   b. Abt 1630, Fort Stewart, County Donegal, Ireland 

Family ID 
F0125 
Group Sheet

Photos

County Donegal, Ireland
This is the Stewart Grotto behind the Killydonnell Friary. The Friary was founded in 1471 by the
O¡¯Donnells for the Franciscan Friars on the site of an older church erected by the O¡¯Tonners. The
bilding and lands were granted at the Planation, in 1603, to Captain Basil Brooke.

County Donegal,Ireland
Ramelton

County Donegal, Ireland
Lough Swilly behind the third old house at Ramelton.

County Donegal, Ireland
The bridge at Ramelton.

See Stewart Caveat for rendering of the bridge around 1609 to 1622.

County Tyrone, Ireland
Castle at Newtown-Stewart

Aughentaine Castle, in Aghintain Townland, was built in 1618 by Sir William Stewart. In 1622 it is was
described as a large Castle of Lyme & Stone, strong & defencible¡­about it is a Bawne of lyme & stone,
211foot long, 112 foot broad & 10 foot high, with Flanckers¡±. Only fragments of this 17th century
fortified house remain. It was destroyed in 1641 and never rebuilt. The west wall stands to full height and
there are some fireplaces at the higher levels. The building was three storeys high plus attic. The main
block is aligned E-W and is about 17m by 10m externally.

A wing about 6m square projects from the middle of the north wall. In the angle between this wing and the W
portion of the main building there is a fine Scottish-type corbel, with 12 courses of corbels. This
carries the remains of a circular stairwell which rises from first floor level.

County Tyrone, Ireland
Castle at Newtown-Stewart

On the Mount-Stewart property Sir William Stewart built the great castle of Aughentaine, which was
destroyed during the disturbances which broke out in 1641. 

County Tyrone, Ireland
Castle at Newtown-Stewart

On the Mount-Stewart property Sir William Stewart built the great castle of Aughentaine, which was
destroyed during the disturbances which broke out in 1641. 

County Donegal, Ireland
In 1611 Sir William Stewart built Fort Stewart as a defence along the shores of Lough Swilly. When another
planter Sir Richard Hansard moved to Lifford, Stewart acquired Hansard¡¯s Ramelton estates. 

In 1623 he was made a baronet and granted the castle of Ramelton, becoming the biggest landowner in the town.
He also gained valuable fishing rights on Lough Swilly.

Donegal had become a county in 1585, and Sir William Stewart was one of the county¡¯s three members of
parliament during the period 1613-15 and again in 1634. He is also credited with building part of
Letterkenny town, and with the formation of the ¡°Lagganeers¡± or Laggan army: this force were
victorious at the battle of Glenmaquin, defeating Sir Phelim O?Neill in 1641. The Stewarts of Ramelton
are buried in their family vault at Killydonnell Franciscan Friary, between Letterkenny and Ramelton.

Documents

County Donegal, Ireland
Land Ownership in 1618

Histories

The Plantation of Ulster.
In a figurative sense the term ¡°Plantation¡± is applied to the establishment of new colonies of
English, Welsh and Scots in Ireland, chiefly carried out by Elizabeth and James I. The preliminary ground
work was, however, laid by Henry VIII, and the first steps were taken during the reigns of Edward VI and Mary.

Sources 
1. [S02864] The Stewart Society, 17 Dublin Street, Edinburgh.
2. [S02856] The Irish Times, Saturday, November 10, 1940

Mary Stewart1
F, #27914, b. circa 1677, d. 4 October 1765
Hon. Mary Stewart|b. c 1677\nd. 4 Oct 1765|p2792.htm#i27914|William Stewart, 1st Viscount
Mountjoy||p2792.htm#i27913|Hon. Mary Coote||p25242.htm#i252415|Sir Alexander Stewart, 2nd
Bt.|d. 3 Sep 1650|p33068.htm#i330678|Catherine Newcomen|d. 8 Dec 1714|p15262.htm#i152616|Richard
Coote, 1st Lord Coote, Baron of Coloony|b. 1620\nd. 10 Jul 1683|p12954.htm#i129532|Mary St. George|d.
5 Nov 1701|p12954.htm#i129533|

Last Edited=19 Jan 2009
     Hon. Mary Stewart was born circa 1677.2 She married, firstly, Phineas Preston in 1692 at Mountjoy,
Ireland.2,1 She married, secondly, Vice-Admiral George Forbes, 3rd Earl of Granard, son of Arthur
Forbes, 2nd Earl of Granard and Mary Rawdon, in 1709.1 She died on 4 October 1765.1 She was also reported to
have died on 4 October 1758.2
     She was the daughter of William Stewart, 1st Viscount Mountjoy and Hon. Mary Coote.1,2 From 1692, her
married name became Preston.2 From 1709, her married name became Forbes. As a result of her marriage, Hon.
Mary Stewart was styled as Countess of Granard on 24 August 1734.
Children of Hon. Mary Stewart and Phineas Preston
Jane Preston+2 b. c 1690, d. a 12 Nov 1746
Mary Preston2 b. 1696, d. 1749
Colonel John Preston+2 b. 1699, d. 1747
Nathaniel Preston2 b. c 1700
Children of Hon. Mary Stewart and Vice-Admiral George Forbes, 3rd Earl of Granard
Lady Mary Forbes1 d. 27 Nov 1797
Lt.-Gen. George Forbes, 4th Earl of Granard+1 b. 15 Mar 1710, d. 16 Oct 1769

William Stewart, 1st Viscount Mountjoy1
M, #27913
William Stewart, 1st Viscount Mountjoy||p2792.htm#i27913|Sir Alexander Stewart, 2nd Bt.|d. 3 Sep
1650|p33068.htm#i330678|Catherine Newcomen|d. 8 Dec 1714|p15262.htm#i152616|Sir William
Stewart, 1st Bt.||p25.htm#i244||||Sir Robert Newcomen, 4th Bt.|d. 12 Aug
1677|p15262.htm#i152617|Anne Boleyn||p15262.htm#i152618|

Last Edited=19 Jan 2009
     William Stewart, 1st Viscount Mountjoy married Hon. Mary Coote, daughter of Richard Coote, 1st Lord
Coote, Baron of Coloony and Mary St. George.1
     He was the son of Sir Alexander Stewart, 2nd Bt. and Catherine Newcomen.2 He succeeded to the title of 3rd
Baronet Stewart, of Ramalton, co. Donegal [I., 1623] on 3 September 1650.1 He was created 1st Viscount
Mountjoy, of co. Tyrone [Ireland] on 19 March 1682/83.3 He was created 1st Baron Stewart of Ramalton, co.
Donegal [Ireland] on 19 March 1682/83.3
Children of William Stewart, 1st Viscount Mountjoy
William Stewart, 2nd Viscount Mountjoy+4 d. 10 Jan 1727/28
Hon. Alexander Stewart+5
Children of William Stewart, 1st Viscount Mountjoy and Hon. Mary Coote
Hon. Catherine Stewart+
Hon. Mary Stewart+6 b. c 1677, d. 4 Oct 1765
Citations
1. [S37] Charles Mosley, editor, Burke¡¯s Peerage, Baronetage & Knightage, 107th edition, 3 volumes
(Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.A.: Burke¡¯s Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd, 2003), volume 1, page
893. Hereinafter cited as Burke¡¯s Peerage and Baronetage, 107th edition.
2. [S6] G.E. Cokayne; with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard
de Walden, editors, The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United
Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant, new ed., 13 volumes in 14 (1910-1959; reprint in 6 volumes,
Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 2000), volume IX, page 349. Hereinafter cited as The Complete Peerage.
3. [S6] Cokayne, and others, The Complete Peerage, volume IX, page 350.
4. [S6] Cokayne, and others, The Complete Peerage, volume IX, page 351.
5. [S6] Cokayne, and others, The Complete Peerage, volume II, page 192.
6. [S37] Charles Mosley, Burke¡¯s Peerage and Baronetage, 107th edition, volume 2, page 1628.
Hon. Mary Stewart1
F, #27914, b. circa 1677, d. 4 October 1765
Hon. Mary Stewart|b. c 1677\nd. 4 Oct 1765|p2792.htm#i27914|William Stewart, 1st Viscount
Mountjoy||p2792.htm#i27913|Hon. Mary Coote||p25242.htm#i252415|Sir Alexander Stewart, 2nd
Bt.|d. 3 Sep 1650|p33068.htm#i330678|Catherine Newcomen|d. 8 Dec 1714|p15262.htm#i152616|Richard
Coote, 1st Lord Coote, Baron of Coloony|b. 1620\nd. 10 Jul 1683|p12954.htm#i129532|Mary St. George|d.
5 Nov 1701|p12954.htm#i129533|

Last Edited=19 Jan 2009
     Hon. Mary Stewart was born circa 1677.2 She married, firstly, Phineas Preston in 1692 at Mountjoy,
Ireland.2,1 She married, secondly, Vice-Admiral George Forbes, 3rd Earl of Granard, son of Arthur
Forbes, 2nd Earl of Granard and Mary Rawdon, in 1709.1 She died on 4 October 1765.1 She was also reported to
have died on 4 October 1758.2
     She was the daughter of William Stewart, 1st Viscount Mountjoy and Hon. Mary Coote.1,2 From 1692, her
married name became Preston.2 From 1709, her married name became Forbes. As a result of her marriage, Hon.
Mary Stewart was styled as Countess of Granard on 24 August 1734.
Children of Hon. Mary Stewart and Phineas Preston
Jane Preston+2 b. c 1690, d. a 12 Nov 1746
Mary Preston2 b. 1696, d. 1749
Colonel John Preston+2 b. 1699, d. 1747
Nathaniel Preston2 b. c 1700
Children of Hon. Mary Stewart and Vice-Admiral George Forbes, 3rd Earl of Granard
Lady Mary Forbes1 d. 27 Nov 1797
Lt.-Gen. George Forbes, 4th Earl of Granard+1 b. 15 Mar 1710, d. 16 Oct 1769

Sir William Stewart, 1st Bt.1
M, #244

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-digest <at> yahoogroups.com 
    Templar-de-Rosemont-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Gmane