michael siciliano | 1 Aug 2012 07:37
Picon

Affect Theory Graduate Seminar

Hello,

You might want to include some of the scholars that have been critical of the "affective turn".
William Mazzarella's "Affect, what is it good for?" (2010) and "Why Is Adorno So Repulsive" (forthcoming) spring to mind along with these two pieces from Critical Inquiry (there's also a reply from Connolly, but I don't have the citation handy).
Leys, Ruth. 2011a. “The Turn to Affect: A Critique.” Critical Inquiry 37 (3) (March 1): 434–472.
———. 2011b. “II Affect and Intention: A Reply to William E. Connolly.” Critical Inquiry 37 (4) (June 1): 799–805.
Best,
Michael


On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:03 PM, CULTSTUD-L automatic digest system <LISTSERV <at> lists.umn.edu> wrote:
There are 7 messages totalling 786 lines in this issue.

Topics of the day:

  1. Affect Theory Graduate Seminar (4)
  2. CFP: SCMS 2013 Panel on "So Bad It's Good"
  3. Feminist Media Studies: Commentary and Criticism Call for Papers - Girls
  4. please post call for papers ACLA 2013

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:11:47 -0400
From:    Radhika Gajjala <cyborgwati <at> GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Affect Theory Graduate Seminar

--f46d043c06e6fa224404c61d675e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Marina,

The grad seminar I taught - I named it Subaltern Studies and Affect. Also I
taught it during the semester I was planning the Digital Media, Race,
Affect and Labor (http://blogs.bgsu.edu/raceandaffect/) event with a
majority of the grad students in that class (and others not in that class
as well) working towards the planning.

So that helped me frame the course in a very particular way. I'm trying to
remember what I used
I used Greg and Melissa's Affect Theory Reader,  Bryan Massumi's work, Sara
Ahmed's Politics of Emotion, Chapters from Patricia Clough's edited
collection too, the special issue of Angelaki on Subalternity and affect
(April 2001 - edited by Jon Beasley-Murray and Albert Morieras) , Aradhana
Sharma's Logics of Empowerment, some work by Mark Andrejevic, work by Latin
American Subaltern Studies writers and some chapters from the (South Asian)
subaltern studies volumes I think. I am sure I would have at least
suggested Leela Gandhi's affective communities.

I cant seem to find my syllabus here on my laptop but I am sure its in my
office somewhere - so will send it your way later.

And for the benefit of those who want to develop a proper reading list - I
will find the proper references later - but I am sure there a lot of people
on this list who are themselves authors of the various works that can be
used in such a syllabus!:)

Marina - I will be in touch off-list as well with more stuff as I remember.

Radhika



On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Marina Levina <mlev2008 <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I will be teaching a graduate seminar on affect theory in the Fall.
> If anyone has done this before and would not mind sharing their
> syllabus I would be much obliged.  I am curious as to how other people
> structured this broad topic.
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Marina
>
> Marina Levina, PhD
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Communication
> University of Memphis
> 212 Art and Communication Bldg
> Memphis, TN 38152
> Office: 901-678-2577
> Fax: 901-678-4331
> mlevina <at> memphis.edu
> http://www.marinalevina.com/
>



--
Radhika Gajjala
http://personal.bgsu.edu/~radhik

--f46d043c06e6fa224404c61d675e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Marina,<div><br></div><div>The grad seminar I taught - I named it Subaltern=
 Studies and Affect. Also I taught it during the semester I was planning th=
e Digital Media, Race, Affect and Labor (<a href=3D"http://blogs.bgsu.edu/r=
aceandaffect/
">http://blogs.bgsu.edu/raceandaffect/</a>) event with a major=
ity of the grad students in that class (and others not in that class as wel=
l) working towards the planning.</div>
<div><br></div><div>So that helped me frame the course in a very particular=
 way. I&#39;m trying to remember what I used</div><div>I used Greg and Meli=
ssa&#39;s Affect Theory Reader, =A0Bryan Massumi&#39;s work, Sara Ahmed&#39=
;s Politics of Emotion, Chapters from Patricia Clough&#39;s edited collecti=
on too, the special issue of Angelaki on Subalternity and affect (April 200=
1 - edited by Jon Beasley-Murray and Albert Morieras) , Aradhana Sharma&#39=
;s Logics of Empowerment, some work by Mark Andrejevic, work by Latin Ameri=
can Subaltern Studies writers and some chapters from the (South Asian) suba=
ltern studies volumes I think. I am sure I would have at least suggested Le=
ela Gandhi&#39;s affective communities.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I cant seem to find my syllabus here on my laptop but I=
 am sure its in my office somewhere - so will send it your way later.=A0</d=
iv><div><br></div><div>And for the benefit of those who want to develop a p=
roper reading list - I will find the proper references later - but I am sur=
e there a lot of people on this list who are themselves authors of the vari=
ous works that can be used in such a syllabus!:)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Marina - I will be in touch off-list as well with more =
stuff as I remember.</div><div><br></div><div>Radhika</div><div><br></div><=
div><br></div><div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1=
:27 PM, Marina Levina <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mlev2008 <at> gmai=
l.com" target=3D"_blank">mlev2008 <at> gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear all,<br>
<br>
I will be teaching a graduate seminar on affect theory in the Fall.<br>
If anyone has done this before and would not mind sharing their<br>
syllabus I would be much obliged. =A0I am curious as to how other people<br=
>
structured this broad topic.<br>
<br>
Thank you in advance,<br>
<br>
Marina<br>
<br>
Marina Levina, PhD<br>
Assistant Professor<br>
Department of Communication<br>
University of Memphis<br>
212 Art and Communication Bldg<br>
Memphis, TN 38152<br>
Office: <a href=3D"tel:901-678-2577" value=3D"+19016782577">901-678-2577</a=
><br>
Fax: <a href=3D"tel:901-678-4331" value=3D"+19016784331">901-678-4331</a><b=
r>
<a href=3D"mailto:mlevina <at> memphis.edu">mlevina <at> memphis.edu</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://www.marinalevina.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.marin=
alevina.com/</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Radhika Gajj=
ala<br><a href=3D"http://personal.bgsu.edu/~radhik" target=3D"_blank">http:=
//personal.bgsu.edu/~radhik</a><br><br>
</div>

--f46d043c06e6fa224404c61d675e--

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:28:52 -0400
From:    Jack Bratich <jbratich <at> RCI.RUTGERS.EDU>
Subject: Re: Affect Theory Graduate Seminar

Hi Marina,=20

Three years ago Stevphen Shukaitis and I co-taught a summer seminar on =
Affective Politics at Bluestockings Bookstore.  The required and =
recommended reading list has some theory in it:
=
http://www.thisisforever.org/past-events/summer-seminar-affective-politics=


Cheers, Jack

On Jul 30, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Marina Levina wrote:

> Dear all,
>=20
> I will be teaching a graduate seminar on affect theory in the Fall.
> If anyone has done this before and would not mind sharing their
> syllabus I would be much obliged.  I am curious as to how other people
> structured this broad topic.
>=20
> Thank you in advance,
>=20
> Marina
>=20
> Marina Levina, PhD
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Communication
> University of Memphis
> 212 Art and Communication Bldg
> Memphis, TN 38152
> Office: 901-678-2577
> Fax: 901-678-4331
> mlevina <at> memphis.edu
> http://www.marinalevina.com/

Jack Z. Bratich
Chair, Dept. of Journalism & Media Studies
Rutgers University
111 SCI
4 Huntington St.
New Brunswick, NJ  08901
http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/directory/jbratich/index.html
732-932-7500 x8173

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:22:30 +0100
From:    Richard McCulloch <richardjmcculloch <at> GMAIL.COM>
Subject: CFP: SCMS 2013 Panel on "So Bad It's Good"

--bcaec501604bdb925804c61e6494
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

*With apologies for cross-posting*

*CALL FOR PAPERS: =91So Bad It=92s Good=92 (Society for Cinema and Media St=
udies
conference panel, Chicago, March 6-10, 2013)*

=91So bad it=92s good=92 is a familiar enough concept. It has often been in=
voked
by fans,
critics and academics in connection with certain kinds of movies and
certain kinds of
reception, being associated especially with cult film. Yet =91bad=92 can ca=
rry
a multitude
of meanings in a cult context. For this SCMS panel we seek work whose focus
is
specifically texts that are valued, by fans or critics, for their aesthetic
ineptitude or
failure =96 what in film studies is often called =91badfilm=92.

From *Plan 9 From Outer Space* (1959) to *The Room* (2003) to =91viral=92
internet videos
like Rebecca Black=92s =91Friday=92 (2011), the text valued for its aesthet=
ic
badness
is championed via a form of interpretive competence which rewards perceived
incompetence. However, while scholarship often invokes the concept of =91so
bad it=92s
good=92, the texts and phenomena to which it refers have in fact received
little detailed
examination. What reading protocols, interpretive communities, or taste
hierarchies
are at play in this particular form of cult appreciation? Equally, does
ironic valuation
complicate or rather shore-up traditional frameworks of aesthetic value
and/or
assumptions about artistic intention?

We are inviting proposals for 20 minute papers on the subject of media
artifacts
commonly deemed =91so bad they=92re good=92. Possible topics and approaches=
 might
include:

- =91So bad it=92s good=92 and reception (e.g.: studies of participatory
audiences, fan
criticism, cult communities, etc.)

- The aesthetics of =91so bad it=92s good=92 (the function of traditional
aesthetic categories
such as value, intention, interpretation, irony, etc. in the
construction/appreciation of
these texts)

- =91So bad it=92s good=92 and the internet (the role of video-sharing and =
social
media in the
growth of cults around badfilms, etc.)

- Intentional =91so bad it=92s good=92 (e.g.: *Planet Terror*, *Tim and Eri=
c
Awesome Show*
*Great Job*, *Look Around You*, etc.)

- =91So bad it=92s good=92 and tastemakers/gatekeepers (e.g.: *Mystery Scie=
nce
Theater*,
Found Footage Fest, Charlie Brooker, etc.)

- =91So bad it=92s good=92 and comedy (comedy as textual or contextual
phenomenon/effect/
experience, etc.)

- The politics of =91so bad it=92s good=92 (e.g.: the =91othering=92 of the=
 bad text,
cult audiences
as subculture, the history and oppositional function of camp taste, etc.)

Please send abstracts of 250 words, along with a short bio (including
at least three bibliographic references) to Richard McCulloch (
richardjmcculloch <at> gmail.com) and James MacDowell (j.b.macdowell <at> gmail.com)
by Monday August 20th. We will be in touch with our decision by Friday
August 24th.

--=20
Richard McCulloch
Associate Tutor/PhD Candidate
University of East Anglia
Norwich Research Park
Norfolk
NR4 7TJ

Academic Profile
http://eastanglia.academia.edu/RMcCulloch

Board Member
Fan Studies Network
http://fanstudies.wordpress.com

--bcaec501604bdb925804c61e6494
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px=
;font-family:arial,sans-serif"><i>With apologies for cross-posting</i></div=
><div style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-se=
rif">

<br></div><div style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:aria=
l,sans-serif"><b>CALL FOR PAPERS:=A0=91So Bad It=92s Good=92 (Society for C=
inema and Media Studies conference panel, Chicago, March 6-10, 2013)</b></d=
iv>
<div style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:13px;font-family:arial,sans-ser=
if"><div><br></div><div>=91So bad it=92s good=92 is a familiar enough conce=
pt. It has often been invoked by fans,</div><div>
critics and academics in connection with certain kinds of movies and certai=
n kinds of</div><div>reception, being associated especially with cult film.=
 Yet =91bad=92 can carry a multitude</div><div>of meanings in a cult contex=
t. For this SCMS panel we seek work whose focus is</div>

<div>specifically texts that are valued, by fans or critics, for their aest=
hetic ineptitude or</div><div>failure =96 what in film studies is often cal=
led =91badfilm=92.</div><div><br></div><div>From=A0<i>Plan 9 From Outer Spa=
ce</i>=A0(1959) to=A0<i>The Room</i>=A0(2003) to =91viral=92 internet video=
s</div>

<div>like Rebecca Black=92s =91Friday=92 (2011), the text valued for its ae=
sthetic badness</div><div>is championed via a form of interpretive competen=
ce which rewards perceived</div><div>incompetence. However, while scholarsh=
ip often invokes the concept of =91so bad it=92s</div>

<div>good=92, the texts and phenomena to which it refers have in fact recei=
ved little detailed</div><div>examination. What reading protocols, interpre=
tive communities, or taste hierarchies</div><div>are at play in this partic=
ular form of cult appreciation? Equally, does ironic valuation</div>

<div>complicate or rather shore-up traditional frameworks of aesthetic valu=
e and/or</div><div>assumptions about artistic intention?</div><div><br></di=
v><div>We are inviting proposals for 20 minute papers on the subject of med=
ia artifacts</div>

<div>commonly deemed =91so bad they=92re good=92. Possible topics and appro=
aches might</div><div>include:</div><div><br></div><div>- =91So bad it=92s =
good=92 and reception (e.g.: studies of participatory audiences, fan</div><=
div>criticism, cult communities, etc.)</div>

<div><br></div><div>- The aesthetics of =91so bad it=92s good=92 (the funct=
ion of traditional aesthetic categories</div><div>such as value, intention,=
 interpretation, irony, etc. in the construction/appreciation of</div><div>=
these texts)</div>

<div><br></div><div>- =91So bad it=92s good=92 and the internet (the role o=
f video-sharing and social media in the</div><div>growth of cults around ba=
dfilms, etc.)</div><div><br></div><div>- Intentional =91so bad it=92s good=
=92 (e.g.:=A0<i>Planet Terror</i>,=A0<i>Tim and Eric Awesome Show</i></div>

<div><i>Great Job</i>,=A0<i>Look Around You</i>, etc.)</div><div><br></div>=
<div>- =91So bad it=92s good=92 and tastemakers/gatekeepers (e.g.:=A0<i>Mys=
tery Science Theater</i>,</div><div>Found Footage Fest, Charlie Brooker, et=
c.)</div>

<div><br></div><div>- =91So bad it=92s good=92 and comedy (comedy as textua=
l or contextual phenomenon/effect/</div><div>experience, etc.)</div><div><b=
r></div><div>- The politics of =91so bad it=92s good=92 (e.g.: the =91other=
ing=92 of the bad text, cult audiences</div>

<div>as subculture, the history and oppositional function of camp taste, et=
c.)</div><div><br></div>Please send abstracts of 250 words, along with a sh=
ort bio (including<br><div>at least three bibliographic references)=A0to Ri=
chard McCulloch=A0(<a href=3D"mailto:richardjmcculloch <at> gmail.com" style=3D"=
color:rgb(17,85,204)" target=3D"_blank">richardjmcculloch <at> gmail.com</a>) an=
d James MacDowell (<a href=3D"mailto:j.b.macdowell <at> gmail.com" style=3D"colo=
r:rgb(17,85,204)" target=3D"_blank">j.b.macdowell <at> gmail.com</a>)</div>

<div>by Monday August 20th. We will be in touch with our decision by Friday=
 August 24th.</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Richard McCulloch<div>Associ=
ate Tutor/PhD Candidate</div><div>University of East Anglia</div><div>
Norwich Research Park</div>
<div>Norfolk</div><div>NR4 7TJ</div><div><br></div><div>Academic Profile</d=
iv><div><a href=3D"http://eastanglia.academia.edu/RMcCulloch" target=3D"_bl=
ank">http://eastanglia.academia.edu/RMcCulloch</a></div><div><br></div><div=
>

Board Member</div><div>Fan Studies Network</div><div><a href=3D"http://fans=
tudies.wordpress.com" target=3D"_blank">http://fanstudies.wordpress.com</a>=
</div></div>

--bcaec501604bdb925804c61e6494--

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:12:44 +0000
From:    "Silva, Kumi" <kumi <at> EMAIL.UNC.EDU>
Subject: Feminist Media Studies: Commentary and Criticism Call for Papers - Girls

FEMINIST MEDIA STUDIES=0A=
Commentary and Criticism Call for Papers=0A=
We invite contributions for the Commentary and Criticism section of Feminis=
t Media Studies.=0A=
=0A=
Girls=0A=
=0A=
Since its debut on HBO, in April 2012, Girls has been one of the most contr=
oversial mediated representations of young women in recent times. =A0From i=
ts discussion of relationships to money to STDs, Girls vacillates between b=
eing highly original and vacuously self-absorbed. =A0Critics fall between t=
hese two extremes, hailing it as =A0=91excruciatingly funny=92 and =91real=
=92 to panning it for its focus on young, wealthy, white women. =A0 Whether=
 fan or foe, the show has generated much discussion, and for this issue of =
Commentary and Criticism, we are interested in short essays that respond an=
d discuss these various controversies raised by Girls, through a feminist m=
edia studies framework. =A0=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
Essays of 1500-2000 words are due by Monday, 10 September and should be ema=
iled to Kumi Silva at kumi <at> email.unc.edu and Kaitlynn Mendes at kmendes <at> dmu=
.ac.uk=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
Submission guidelines can be found at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/journ=
al.asp?issn=3D1468-0777&linktype=3D44=0A=


------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:43:39 -0400
From:    Shaka McGlotten <shaka.mcglotten <at> GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Affect Theory Graduate Seminar

--0015173fe602cc798704c6220ac1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

So, some general recs not already mentioned:
Kathleen Stewart, Ordinary Affects
Most things by Lauren Berlant
Ann Cvetkovich, An Archive of Feelings.
Hardt and others on affective/immaterial labor.

Depending on how you want to go you could also emphasizes/teach
Merleau-Ponty, Deleuze, Alphonso Lingis.
I'm creating a film and media studies class this fall on Genres of Affect
and can forward those refs too, on or off list.

Shaka

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Jack Bratich <jbratich <at> rci.rutgers.edu>wrote:

> Hi Marina,
>
> Three years ago Stevphen Shukaitis and I co-taught a summer seminar on
> Affective Politics at Bluestockings Bookstore.  The required and
> recommended reading list has some theory in it:
> http://www.thisisforever.org/past-events/summer-seminar-affective-politics
>
> Cheers, Jack
>
> On Jul 30, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Marina Levina wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I will be teaching a graduate seminar on affect theory in the Fall.
> > If anyone has done this before and would not mind sharing their
> > syllabus I would be much obliged.  I am curious as to how other people
> > structured this broad topic.
> >
> > Thank you in advance,
> >
> > Marina
> >
> > Marina Levina, PhD
> > Assistant Professor
> > Department of Communication
> > University of Memphis
> > 212 Art and Communication Bldg
> > Memphis, TN 38152
> > Office: 901-678-2577
> > Fax: 901-678-4331
> > mlevina <at> memphis.edu
> > http://www.marinalevina.com/
>
> Jack Z. Bratich
> Chair, Dept. of Journalism & Media Studies
> Rutgers University
> 111 SCI
> 4 Huntington St.
> New Brunswick, NJ  08901
> http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/directory/jbratich/index.html
> 732-932-7500 x8173
>



--
shaka mcglotten
c. 917.287.3784

--0015173fe602cc798704c6220ac1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

So, some general recs not already mentioned:<br>Kathleen Stewart, Ordinary =
Affects<br>Most things by Lauren Berlant<br>Ann Cvetkovich, An Archive of F=
eelings.<br>Hardt and others on affective/immaterial labor.<br><br>Dependin=
g on how you want to go you could also emphasizes/teach Merleau-Ponty, Dele=
uze, Alphonso Lingis.<br>
I&#39;m creating a film and media studies class this fall on Genres of Affe=
ct and can forward those refs too, on or off list.<br><br>Shaka<br><br><div=
 class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Jack Bratich <span =
dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jbratich <at> rci.rutgers.edu" target=3D"_blan=
k">jbratich <at> rci.rutgers.edu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Marina,<br>
<br>
Three years ago Stevphen Shukaitis and I co-taught a summer seminar on Affe=
ctive Politics at Bluestockings Bookstore. =A0The required and recommended =
reading list has some theory in it:<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.thisisforever.org/past-events/summer-seminar-affectiv=
e-politics
" target=3D"_blank">http://www.thisisforever.org/past-events/summ=
er-seminar-affective-politics
</a><br>
<br>
Cheers, Jack<br>
<div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
On Jul 30, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Marina Levina wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; Dear all,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I will be teaching a graduate seminar on affect theory in the Fall.<br=
>
&gt; If anyone has done this before and would not mind sharing their<br>
&gt; syllabus I would be much obliged. =A0I am curious as to how other peop=
le<br>
&gt; structured this broad topic.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Thank you in advance,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Marina<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Marina Levina, PhD<br>
&gt; Assistant Professor<br>
&gt; Department of Communication<br>
&gt; University of Memphis<br>
&gt; 212 Art and Communication Bldg<br>
&gt; Memphis, TN 38152<br>
&gt; Office: <a href=3D"tel:901-678-2577" value=3D"+19016782577">901-678-25=
77</a><br>
&gt; Fax: <a href=3D"tel:901-678-4331" value=3D"+19016784331">901-678-4331<=
/a><br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:mlevina <at> memphis.edu">mlevina <at> memphis.edu</a><br>
&gt; <a href=3D"http://www.marinalevina.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.=
marinalevina.com/</a><br>
<br>
</div></div>Jack Z. Bratich<br>
Chair, Dept. of Journalism &amp; Media Studies<br>
Rutgers University<br>
111 SCI<br>
4 Huntington St.<br>
New Brunswick, NJ =A008901<br>
<a href=3D"http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/directory/jbratich/index.html" targe=
t=3D"_blank">http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/directory/jbratich/index.html</a><=
br>
<a href=3D"tel:732-932-7500%20x8173" value=3D"+17329327500">732-932-7500 x8=
173</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>shaka mcglotten<br>c. 9=
17.287.3784<br>

--0015173fe602cc798704c6220ac1--

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:00:46 -0600
From:    Ondine Park <opark <at> UALBERTA.CA>
Subject: Re: Affect Theory Graduate Seminar

--bcaec5196461994c9004c6231e3d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Marina
At the risk of being immodest, may I recommend a book I recently
co-edited...

*Ecologies of Affect: Placing Nostalgia, Desire, and Hope*. Eds. Tonya K.
Davidson, Ondine Park, and Rob Shields. (Wilfrid Laurier Press, 2011).
http://www.wlupress.wlu.ca/press/Catalog/davidson.shtml

This volume brings together articles that both theorize affect and puts the
theory to work in examining specific cases that consider place and space as
both material and imaginary, constituted in large part by affective
attachments and idealizations.

Here is the TOC, for your perusal:

Introduction, by Ondine Park, Tonya K. Davidson, and Rob Shields

Section I: Nostalgia
1. =93Not everything was good, but many things were better=94: Nostalgia fo=
r
East Germany and Its Politics, by Anne Winkler
2. Nostalgia and Postmemories of a Lost Place: Actualizing "My Virtual
Homeland," Tonya K. Davidson
3. Placing Nostalgia: The Process of Returning and Remaking Home, by
Allison Hui
4. From Disease to Desire: The Afflicted Amalgamation of Music and
Nostalgia, by Mickey Vallee

Section II Desire
5. The Tourist Affect: Escape and Syncresis on the Las Vegas Strip, by Rob
Shields
6. (In)Human Desiring and Extended Agency, by Matthew Tiessen
7. Cityscapes of Desire: Urban Change in Post-Soviet Russia, by Olga Pak
8. Illustrating Desires: The Idea and the Promise of the Suburb in Two
Children's Books, by Ondine Park

Section III Hope
9. The Virtual Places of Childhood: Hope and the Micro-Politics of Race at
an Inner-City Youth Centre, by Bonar Buffam
10. Virtual Resurrections: Che Guevara's Image as Place of Hope, by
Maria-Carolina Cambre
11. Performing Spaces of Hope: Street Puppetry and the Aesthetics of Scale,
by Petra Hroch
12. The Spatial Distribution of Hope In and Beyond Fort McMurray, by Sara
Dorow and Goze Dogu
13. Spectacular Enclosures of Hope: Artificial Islands in the Gulf and the
Present, by Mark S. Jackson and Veronica della Dora

Conclusion: A Roundtable on the Affective Turn, by Rob Shields and Ondine
Park and Tonya K. Davidson

Best wishes,
Ondine

---
Ondine Park
Department of Sociology, University of Alberta
5-21 Tory Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H4



On Jul 30, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Marina Levina wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I will be teaching a graduate seminar on affect theory in the Fall.
> > If anyone has done this before and would not mind sharing their
> > syllabus I would be much obliged.  I am curious as to how other people
> > structured this broad topic.
> >
> > Thank you in advance,
> >
> > Marina
> >
> > Marina Levina, PhD
> > Assistant Professor
> > Department of Communication
> > University of Memphis
> > 212 Art and Communication Bldg
> > Memphis, TN 38152
> > Office: 901-678-2577
> > Fax: 901-678-4331
> > mlevina <at> memphis.edu
> > http://www.marinalevina.com/
>
>

--bcaec5196461994c9004c6231e3d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Marina<div>At the risk of being immodest, may I recommend a book I re=
cently co-edited... =A0</div><div><br></div><div><i>Ecologies of Affect: Pl=
acing Nostalgia, Desire, and Hope</i>. Eds. Tonya K. Davidson, Ondine Park,=
 and Rob Shields. (Wilfrid Laurier Press, 2011).=A0<a href=3D"http://www.wl=
upress.wlu.ca/press/Catalog/davidson.shtml">http://www.wlupress.wlu.ca/pres=
s/Catalog/davidson.shtml
</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><div>This volume brings together articles that both the=
orize affect and puts the theory to work in examining specific cases that c=
onsider place and space as both material and imaginary, constituted in larg=
e part by affective attachments and idealizations.=A0</div>
</div><div><br></div><div>Here is the TOC, for your perusal:</div><div><div=
><br></div><div>Introduction, by Ondine Park, Tonya K. Davidson, and Rob Sh=
ields</div><div><br></div><div>Section I: Nostalgia</div><div>1. =93Not eve=
rything was good, but many things were better=94: Nostalgia for East German=
y and Its Politics, by Anne Winkler</div>
<div>2. Nostalgia and Postmemories of a Lost Place: Actualizing &quot;My Vi=
rtual Homeland,&quot; Tonya K. Davidson</div><div>3. Placing Nostalgia: The=
 Process of Returning and Remaking Home, by Allison Hui</div><div>4. From D=
isease to Desire: The Afflicted Amalgamation of Music and Nostalgia, by Mic=
key Vallee</div>
<div><br></div><div>Section II<span class=3D"Apple-tab-span" style=3D"white=
-space:pre">    </span>Desire<span class=3D"Apple-tab-span" style=3D"white-spa=
ce:pre">        </span></div><div>5. The Tourist Affect: Escape and Syncresis on t=
he Las Vegas Strip, by Rob Shields</div>
<div>6. (In)Human Desiring and Extended Agency, by Matthew Tiessen</div><di=
v>7. Cityscapes of Desire: Urban Change in Post-Soviet Russia, by Olga Pak<=
/div><div>8. Illustrating Desires: The Idea and the Promise of the Suburb i=
n Two Children&#39;s Books, by Ondine Park</div>
<div><br></div><div>Section III<span class=3D"Apple-tab-span" style=3D"whit=
e-space:pre">   </span>Hope<span class=3D"Apple-tab-span" style=3D"white-spac=
e:pre"> </span></div><div>9. The Virtual Places of Childhood: Hope and the =
Micro-Politics of Race at an Inner-City Youth Centre, by Bonar Buffam</div>
<div>10. Virtual Resurrections: Che Guevara&#39;s Image as Place of Hope, b=
y Maria-Carolina Cambre<span class=3D"Apple-tab-span" style=3D"white-space:=
pre">   </span></div><div>11. Performing Spaces of Hope: Street Puppetry and =
the Aesthetics of Scale, by Petra Hroch</div>
<div>12. The Spatial Distribution of Hope In and Beyond Fort McMurray, by S=
ara Dorow and Goze Dogu</div><div>13. Spectacular Enclosures of Hope: Artif=
icial Islands in the Gulf and the Present, by Mark S. Jackson and Veronica =
della Dora</div>
<div><br></div><div>Conclusion: A Roundtable on the Affective Turn, by Rob =
Shields and Ondine Park and Tonya K. Davidson</div></div><div><br></div><di=
v>Best wishes,</div><div>Ondine<br clear=3D"all"><br>---<br>Ondine Park<div=
>
Department of Sociology,=A0University of Alberta</div><div>5-21 Tory Buildi=
ng, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H4</div><br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Jul 30, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Marina Levina wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; Dear all,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I will be teaching a graduate seminar on affect theory in the Fall.<br=
>
&gt; If anyone has done this before and would not mind sharing their<br>
&gt; syllabus I would be much obliged. =A0I am curious as to how other peop=
le<br>
&gt; structured this broad topic.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Thank you in advance,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Marina<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Marina Levina, PhD<br>
&gt; Assistant Professor<br>
&gt; Department of Communication<br>
&gt; University of Memphis<br>
&gt; 212 Art and Communication Bldg<br>
&gt; Memphis, TN 38152<br>
&gt; Office: <a href=3D"tel:901-678-2577" value=3D"+19016782577">901-678-25=
77</a><br>
&gt; Fax: <a href=3D"tel:901-678-4331" value=3D"+19016784331">901-678-4331<=
/a><br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:mlevina <at> memphis.edu">mlevina <at> memphis.edu</a><br>
&gt; <a href=3D"http://www.marinalevina.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.=
marinalevina.com/</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>

--bcaec5196461994c9004c6231e3d--

------------------------------

Date:    Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:07:19 -0400
From:    "Totosy de Zepetnek, Steven" <clcweb <at> PURDUE.EDU>
Subject: please post call for papers ACLA 2013

Call for papers: American Comparative Literature Association annual =
conference, University of Toronto, 4-7 April 2013 =
http://www.acla.org/acla2013/. Abstracts of papers are invited to Steven =
Totosy de Zepetnek by 31 December 2012 at totosysteven <at> purdue.edu for =
the panel "New Media and Publishing in the Humanities." Debates about =
publishing in online journals and the publishing of books online instead =
of print or in print-on-demand suggest that both scholarship and the =
situation of academic publishers are changing rapidly. Papers can be =
overviews of the current situation of digital publishing in the =
humanities in the U.S. and world wide and about specific issues such as =
the relevance of the "impact factor" in the humanities, aspects of =
"digital humanities," digital preservation and archival, the valuation =
of scholarship published online with regard to tenure and promotion, the =
reading and teaching of scholarship in print versus online, the current =
move towards courseware online in open access, etc. Selected and =
peer-reviewed papers of the panel are planned to be published in the =
peer-reviewed online journal CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture =
(Thomson Reuters ISI indexed).=

------------------------------

End of CULTSTUD-L Digest - 30 Jul 2012 to 31 Jul 2012 (#2012-82)
****************************************************************



--
Michael Siciliano
Mobile:412-513-7838
Email: Msiciliano <at> gmail.com
Joanna Zylinska | 1 Aug 2012 21:17
Picon

Paying Attention: new issue of Culture Machine

CULTURE MACHINE 13 (2012)
http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/issue/current

PAYING ATTENTION
edited by Patrick Crogan and Samuel Kinsley

How are the ways we understand subjective experience – not least 
cognitively – being modulated by political economic rationales? And how 
might artists, cultural theorists, social scientists and radical 
philosophers learn to respond – analytically, creatively, 
methodologically and politically – to the commodification of human 
capacities of attention? This special issue of Culture Machine explores 
these interlinked questions as a way of building upon and opening out 
contemporary research concerning the economisation of cognitive 
capacities. It proposes a contemporary critical re-focussing on the 
politics, ethics and aesthetics of the ‘attention economy’, a notion 
developed in the 1990s by scholars such as Jonathan Beller, Michael 
Goldhaber and Georg Franck.

Contents

Patrick Crogan, Samuel Kinsley, ‘Paying Attention: Towards a Critique of 
the Attention Economy’

Bernard Stiegler, ‘Relational Ecology and the Digital Pharmakon’

Tiziana Terranova, ‘Attention, Economy and the Brain’

Jonathan Beller, ‘Wagers Within the Image: Rise of Visuality, 
Transformation of Labour, Aesthetic Regimes’

Samuel Kinsley, ‘Towards Peer-to-Peer Alternatives: An Interview with 
Michel Bauwens’

Sy Taffel, ‘Escaping Attention: Digital Media Hardware, Materiality and 
Ecological Cost’

Ben Roberts, ‘Attention-seeking: Technics, Publics and Software 
Individuation’

Taina Bucher, ‘A Technicity of Attention: How Software “Makes Sense”’

Martyn Thayne, ‘Friends Like Mine: The Production of Socialised 
Subjectivity in the Attention Economy’

Rolien Hoyng, ‘Popping Up and Fading Out: Participatory Networks and 
Istanbul’s Creative City Project’

Bjarke Liboriussen, ‘Second Life: Message (to Professionals), Attention! 
Economic Bubble (to the Rest of Us)’

Bjarke Liboriussen, Ursula Plesner, ‘Current Architectural Use of 
Virtual Worlds’

Ruth Catlow, ‘We Won’t Fly for Art: Media Art Ecologies’

Constance Fleuriot, ‘Avoiding Vapour Trails in the Virtual Cloud: 
Developing Ethical Design Questions for Pervasive Media Producers’

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ABOUT CULTURE MACHINE

Established in 1999 and edited by Clare Birchall, Dave Boothroyd, Gary 
Hall and Joanna Zylinska, the Culture Machine journal publishes new work 
from both established figures and up-and-coming writers. It is fully 
refereed and has an International Advisory Board which includes Geoffrey 
Bennington, Robert Bernasconi, Sue Golding, Lawrence Grossberg, Peggy 
Kamuf, Alphonso Lingis, Meaghan Morris, Paul Patton, Mark Poster, Avital 
Ronell, Nicholas Royle and Kenneth Surin.

Culture Machine is part of Open Humanities Press:
http://www.openhumanitiespress.org

For more information, visit the Culture Machine site:
http://www.culturemachine.net

--

-- 
Professor Joanna Zylinska
Department of Media and Communications
Goldsmiths, University of London

http://www.joannazylinska.net

stefanie snider | 2 Aug 2012 04:52
Picon
Favicon

Disability Art and Culure Project: Survey and Listening Session

The Disability Arts and Culture Project (DACP) is a non-profit organization located in Portland, OR (http://dacphome.org/about/). The mission of the Disability Art and Culture Project is to further the artistic expression of people with both hidden and visible disabilities. DACP views disability as a natural and valuable variation of the human form. We believe affirmative disability identity is intertwined with racial, gender, social, and economic justice.

DACP has created and hosted some amazing events in the past and it is now seeking more community input in determining its future directions and projects. If you have a few minutes and/or a couple of hours to participate in this online survey and community listening session, DACP would be incredibly grateful for your help.


**You don't need to live in Portland or be a person with a disability(ies) to take part in the online survey. DACP could really use all the help it can get - feel free to circulate widely. Thanks!**


Have a few minutes and interested in sharing your views on the intersections of disability, race, the arts, and more? This survey takes 5-15 minutes and DACP would love to hear what you have to say! All answers are anonymous and will be used to help plan future projects:

Survey in 16 point type with blue and white background and white or black type:
http://www.sogosurvey.com/k/SsRQTPsRsPsPsP


Survey in 18 point type with black and white background and green or black type:
http://www.sogosurvey.com/k/SsRQTPsSsPsPsP


If you have more than a few minutes and want to contribute to the Disability Art and Culture Project in person, please think about attending DACP's first community listening session on August 11, 2012 at the Portland Community College Cascade Campus, 2:30-4:30pm in Terrell Hall Room 112. The event is free and open to all; it is wheelchair accessible. Please be scent-free. Refreshments will be provided. For any other accessibility questions, please contact Kathy at 503-238-0723 or disabiliyartculture <at> gmail.com. Facebook event page: http://www.facebook.com/events/269761673126053/. Please Register by phone or email at 503-238-0723 or disabiliyartculture <at> gmail.com.

Thank you!
Margaret E. Toye | 2 Aug 2012 13:42
Picon

Re: CULTSTUD-L Digest - 30 Jul 2012 to 31 Jul 2012 (#2012-82)


Re: Affect Theory Graduate Seminar

I taught an Affect Theory Graduate Seminar a couple of years ago.

It went really well. But what went even better was my 4th year seminar in affect theory,
where we focussed on feminist and feminist queer affect theory.
It seemed the students in either seminar who were steeped in feminist theory really "got it" --
i surmised from so many years of breaking down mind/body, reason/emotion, private/public, personal/political distinctions in their feminist work.

Good luck!
Margaret


*********************************************
Dr. Margaret E. Toye
Associate Professor, 
Coordinator, Women and Gender Studies,
Member of MA in CAST Program
Wilfrid Laurier University
Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3C5
Phone: (519) 884-0710 x2010
**********************************************



On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Marina Levina <mlev2008 <at> gmail.com> wrote:

Dear all,

I will be teaching a graduate seminar on affect theory in the Fall.
If anyone has done this before and would not mind sharing their
syllabus I would be much obliged.  I am curious as to how other people
structured this broad topic.

Thank you in advance,

Marina

Marina Levina, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Communication
University of Memphis
212 Art and Communication Bldg
Memphis, TN 38152
Office: 901-678-2577
Fax: 901-678-4331
mlevina <at> memphis.edu
http://www.marinalevina.com/


***









Carolyn Veldstra | 3 Aug 2012 14:04
Picon
Picon
Favicon

CFP: You Can't Be Serious

Call for Papers: You Can’t Be Serious

An Exploration of the Idea, Importance and Influence of Seriousness and Nonseriousness in the Contemporary Humanities

 

The 2013 John Douglas Taylor Conference 
May 15-17, 2013
McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

 

Confirmed Keynotes: Jeremy Gilbert (University of East London), Julie Rak (University of Alberta).

 

Scholarship and intellectual work are serious business: serious people thinking seriously about serious things. To be serious is to stake a claim to legitimacy, importance and moral and social relevance. In today’s academic environment, it can seem vital to reiterate the seriousness of one’s work in order to secure promotions, positions, resources and even the notice of one’s peers. And yet to declare seriousness is to deem certain topics, attachments, questions and trends unserious, unworthy of attention, rigorous thought and sustained debate. In staking our work around the unexamined metric of seriousness, what is lost? What questions remain unasked?

 

Despite its centrality to so much of our practice, the notion of seriousness often goes overlooked and under-thought. Indeed, while much effort is expended on the broad task of delimiting the borders of what could, should or ought to be taken seriously, the question of what constitutes seriousness in our current cultural moment does not receive nearly as much attention.

 

The purpose of the 2013 John Douglas Taylor Conference is to place seriousness front and centre: to think through seriousness, to consider what it is, what it means, what it might hide or efface. What is invested in a marker like seriousness? Is it important that we retain such a measure and if we were to jettison seriousness, what could replace it? This conference will also call attention to the unserious, considering the value and role of unserious topics, debates and modes of understanding our current cultural moment.

 

In this approach, we are not interested in establishing a hierarchy of serious and non-serious topics, or advocating a new list of topics to be taken seriously (though we are open to self-reflexive forms of this process) but, instead, in investigating how and why the impulse to construct such a typology works. What is the cultural hold seriousness has over us, how do we fight it, or do we even want to? If we seek to ask serious questions, how do we go about determining what these might be, and how do we know they’re serious? How might an engagement with unserious methodologies and topics enrich or threaten existing knowledge?

 

Given that seriousness isn’t the subject of any large body of existing scholarship, but rather a common and constant concern across all manner of scholarship, we welcome submissions that engage with seriousness in any number of theoretical, sociological, anthropological, textual, historical, political, activist, ethical, artistic or other methods.

 

You Can’t Be Serious will involve two different types of panels: the first will involve traditional academic papers, while the second will be based around roundtable discussions.

 

Morning sessions will be composed of traditional paper presentations. Papers may address topics and questions including, but not limited to, the following:

 

§ What does it mean to be serious and how does one determine what is serious?

§ Unseriousness: the trivial, the flippant, the glib, the humorous.

§ Unserious affects: boredom, irritation, amusement.

§ Living in Serious Times: 9/11, neoliberalism, global warming, terrorism, precarity, recession, the Euro Crisis, debt.

§ Seriousness in culture: canon formation, preservation, inspiration.

§ Why so serious? The social imperative to be serious.

§ Being taken seriously (1): marginalised identities and social status.

§ Being taken seriously (2): fandom, social media, reality TV, comic books, video games and Bieber Fever.

§ Being taken seriously (3): the Humanities, how we do we defend the value of the work undertaken in our disciplines?

§ The role of the serious in taste, value and cultural hierarchies.

§ Serious Scholarship: The rhetoric of rigour and the demands of funding.

§ Moral Seriousness: responsibility, accountability, justice.

§ We Need to Talk About… Sandusky, Santorum, Strauss-Kahn

§ Serious _______: Business, Crime, Disease, etc.

§ The aesthetics of seriousness and/or unseriousness.

§ The relation of work and play.

§ The ethics of seriousness and/or unseriousness.

§ Seriousness/unseriousness and gender: queer theory, transgender, role play, performance, crossing boundaries. 

§ Seriousness in political discourse: activism, the Tea Party, political campaigning, the Arab Spring.

§ The role of the academy is determining what is serious.

 

Individual paper submissions should include a 500-word abstract clearly articulating your thesis and its relation to the conference theme. Please include your contact information and institutional affiliation. 

It is our hope that this conference can as much spark discussion and debate as offer a venue by which to present research and work in progress. To that end, afternoon sessions will be devoted to roundtable discussions on themes that take up the question of seriousness within particular topics, fields and questions. Roundtable discussions will include up to five participants who will each deliver a short provocation (5 minutes) designed to generate further discussion between presenters and the audience. The purpose of these panels is to provide a forum to develop, as well as deliver, ideas.

 

The themes of the afternoon roundtable discussions are as follows:

 

1)     Is it (always) racist to not take race seriously?

2)     S(queer)iousness?

3)     Why don’t we want to take hipsters seriously?

4)     Is Nature serious?

5)     Is there such a thing as an unserious politics?

6)     The Sokal Hoax, seventeen years on…

7)     What’s more serious, the centre or the margin?

8)     Adorno got picked last in gym class: Sports and Seriousness

To apply to a roundtable discussion, please submit a 300-word response to one of these topics clearly indicating the question to which you are responding and your position. As well, please provide your contact information and institutional affiliation.

Please submit all proposals (paper and roundtable) via e-mail attachment by September 30, 2012 to tayconf <at> mcmaster.ca with the subject line “Taylor Conference: Seriousness.” Attachments should be in .doc, .docx or .rtf formats.

You Can’t Be Serious will take place 15-17 May 2013 at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The conference is sponsored by the Department of English and Cultural Studies and supported by the John Douglas Taylor Fund.

Conference organizing committee: Nicholas Holm, Pamela Ingleton, Susie O’Brien and Carolyn Veldstra




Eqmj | 3 Aug 2012 12:41
Picon
Favicon

CFP: European Fandom and Fan Studies, Amsterdam, Nov 10, 2012

European Fandom and Fan Studies, 10 November 2012
One Day Symposium, Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis
 and University of Amsterdam Department of Media Studies
Call for Papers
 
 
Fan Studies is growing but primarily focused in North America. This one day symposium at the University of Amsterdam seeks to explore the state of Fan Studies and the variety of Fandoms focussed within the broader social and geographical boundaries of Europe. Inter-disciplinary papers are invited to explore the nature of the field itself or how different fandoms function within Europe. Potential avenues of exploration may include how Fan Studies is represented, studied, and received within European universities, by funding bodies and publishers. Papers on Fandoms may explore how European (English and non-English speaking) fans of European and non-European objects of fan appreciation participate in fandom, the differences between internet fandoms and local/national/international fan practices, and the different objects of fan appreciation.
 
Topics of interest include but are not limited to:
-Transformative Works
-Fan History
-Fan Infrastructures
-Fan Charity and Activism
-Fan Cultures and Identities
-Impact on Public Policy and Industry Practice
-Economies within Fandom and/or Fan Studies
-Students as Fans
-Fan Studies within Higher Education courses
-Crossing national, cultural, and language boundaries in Fandom and Fan Studies
 
The symposium is associated with a special issue of the Journal of Transformative Works and Cultures tentatively slated for 2015, with full papers due January 1, 2014.
 
 
Event Details
The symposium will be held in the centre of Amsterdam, easily accessible from Amsterdam international airport.


Submission Process
Please send a 300 word abstract along with a short (100 word) biographical note to Anne Kustritz (A.M.Kustritz <at> uva.nl) or Emma England (E.E.England <at> uva.nl) by 10 September.


Anne Kustritz
Assistant Professor of Media Studies, TV Team
University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis
Peaslee, Robert | 3 Aug 2012 19:06
Picon
Favicon

Panel CFP - SCMS Chicago 2013 - Situating Festival, Tourism and Media Studies

Dear Colleagues,

Apologies for cross-posting….

Call for Abstracts

Society for Cinema and Media Studies (SCMS)
2013 Conference

Panel Proposal:

Intersection: Situating Festival, Tourism and Media Studies

Festivals are eminently intersectional phenomena. They exist as crossroads at which diverse players
interact and as fields upon which a number of social activities take place. They offer insight into the
nature of media texts, institutions of power, audience practices, and the evolution of technologies.
Festivals also offer opportunities to examine the constitution and communication of place and space,
relationships between governmental and commercial entities, and flows of capital, information,
bodies, and influence.

The fecundity of such milieu is apparent but also undermined by a relative lack of communication across
disciplinary boundaries separating the study of festivals, tourism, and media. This panel proposal
seeks paperabstracts which attempt to address this shortfall, either through presenting original
research that addresses the connection between these areas of study, or through critical theoretical
work that attempts to knit the literatures together in novel, productive ways.

Panel chair: Robert Moses Peaslee, Texas Tech University

Please send abstracts of approximately 500 words, an author bio, and 3-5 relevant biographical sources to
robert.peaslee <at> ttu.edu<mailto:robert.peaslee <at> ttu.edu> no later than August 15, 2012.

The 2013 SCMS Conference will take place in Chicago, March 6-10, 2013.

Peaslee, Robert | 4 Aug 2012 03:55
Picon
Favicon

CFP: SCMS Panel Proposal - Situating Festival, Tourism, and Media Studies

Dear Colleagues,

Apologies for cross-posting….

Call for Abstracts

Society for Cinema and Media Studies (SCMS)
2013 Conference

Panel Proposal:

Intersection: Situating Festival, Tourism and Media Studies

Festivals are eminently intersectional phenomena. They exist as crossroads at which diverse players
interact and as fields upon which a number of social activities take place. They offer insight into the
nature of media texts, institutions of power, audience practices, and the evolution of technologies.
Festivals also offer opportunities to examine the constitution and communication of place and space,
relationships between governmental and commercial entities, and flows of capital, information,
bodies, and influence.

The fecundity of such milieu is apparent but also undermined by a relative lack of communication across
disciplinary boundaries separating the study of festivals, tourism, and media. This panel proposal
seeks paperabstracts which attempt to address this shortfall, either through presenting original
research that addresses the connection between these areas of study, or through critical theoretical
work that attempts to knit the literatures together in novel, productive ways.

Panel chair: Robert Moses Peaslee, Texas Tech University

Please send abstracts of approximately 500 words, an author bio, and 3-5 relevant biographical sources
torobert.peaslee <at> ttu.edu<mailto:robert.peaslee <at> ttu.edu><mailto:robert.peaslee <at> ttu.edu> no
later than August 15, 2012.

The 2013 SCMS Conference will take place in Chicago, March 6-10, 2013.

Fred Fejes | 5 Aug 2012 16:51
Favicon

Communication/Cultural Studies/Associated Fields List Serves.

I am teaching an Introduction to Graduate Studies course and one of the things I want to have for students is a list of list-serves dealing with Communication/Cultural Studies and  associated fields.  Obviously there is this list-serv.  Also  some of the professional organizations have list-servs  e.g. (CRTNET).  I am  particularly interested in list-servs from other  areas (film studies,  queer studies,  woman’s studies, sociology, history, literary studies, geography,  philosophy, etc) that students could use.

 

I will share whatever I get.

 

Thanks

 

Fred

 

Fred Fejes | 5 Aug 2012 16:51
Favicon

Re: Communication/Cultural Studies/Associated Fields List Serves.

Also I would be interested in any blogs, websites, etc that would be useful.

 

Fred

 

From: A listserv devoted to Cultural Studies [mailto:CULTSTUD-L <at> LISTS.UMN.EDU] On Behalf Of Fred Fejes
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 10:51 AM
To: CULTSTUD-L <at> LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: [CULTSTUD-L] Communication/Cultural Studies/Associated Fields List Serves.

 

I am teaching an Introduction to Graduate Studies course and one of the things I want to have for students is a list of list-serves dealing with Communication/Cultural Studies and  associated fields.  Obviously there is this list-serv.  Also  some of the professional organizations have list-servs  e.g. (CRTNET).  I am  particularly interested in list-servs from other  areas (film studies,  queer studies,  woman’s studies, sociology, history, literary studies, geography,  philosophy, etc) that students could use.

 

I will share whatever I get.

 

Thanks

 

Fred

 


Gmane