Andrei Stefanescu | 2 Dec 2011 09:57
Picon
Picon

The carving of hair strands

Hello everybody,

could anyone point me to a visual tutorial on carving hair? I'm looking and looking at what the old masters
did, but I'm wondering about the sequence of steps to be taken.  

Thanks and greetings to all,
Andrei

 
Robin Antar | 2 Dec 2011 14:20

Re: The carving of hair strands

Andrei

I know nothing about carving hair, but I would think you have to carve the
form first, then work on texture.

Robin Antar 

>
>could anyone point me to a visual tutorial on carving hair? I'm looking
>and looking at what the old masters did, but I'm wondering about the
>sequence of steps to be taken.
>

 
Don Dougan | 2 Dec 2011 15:48
Picon

Re: The carving of hair strands

Hey Andrei,
Though I can't point you in the direction of any specific visual tutorials
about hair, if you can find any images of Emilio Greco's works - especially
his life-size figures - I think you would find them to be well worth the
study.  He worked primarily in ceramic and bronze, but his shadows and
highlights of the hair mass on the head are amazingly successful in their
suggestive properties rather than their meticulous rendering.
For instance, where the hair is thin (at the temples or along the edge of
the forehead) instead of treating the mass of hair as a protrusion from the
flesh/skull contour, he actually hollows the contour slightly before
bringing it up to be proud of the contour of the flesh/skull.  The
'texture' representing the hair begins lightly in the hollow and then rises
up with greater emphasis as the mass becomes more-proud of the surface of
the skull contour.  This results in the shadows and highlights suggestive
of the hair making a much more believable 'fool-the-eye' transition in a
solid/opaque material between the no-hair / thin or sparse hair / and
fully-rich and thick hair areas which are being represented.
Though I am rarely a fully-figurative sculptor in my own efforts (more
abstracted! <grin>), I would agree with Robin that the mass must come
first, and then rather than trying to meticulously render the strands on
the surfaces you would be better to find textural tool markings which would
'suggest' the complexity of the multiple strands -- such as scratches from
a rasp or riffle, or strokes from a thin-bladed abrasive wheel/blade.
I have found that in examining 19th century figurative carvings (which I
repair for collectors, galleries, museums) that the 19th century carvers
were masters of rendering suggestion rather than rendering perfect copies
of anatomy.
By the way, there is a museum of Emilio Greco in a de-consecrated church
his hometown of Orvieto, Italy which has some great examples of the
technique I described above.   Unfortunately the museum does not allow
(Continue reading)

marg gurr | 2 Dec 2011 16:08
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: carving strands of hair

I’ve got a piece on the go currently that has a few trellises(?) falling 
down the front of the brow on a face an,d to be honest, I have no idea how 
or if I’ll take it too much further.  The main goal for me was to get that 
brow where I wanted it and as tidy as possible first, leaving the trellises 
roughed in with enough to spare to keep my options open.  I could probably 
sneak some air under them if I really tried, but given that it’s somewhat of 
a surreal rendition anyway, I may just leave them flat against the brow and 
vary the depth from the surface.
I’d love to hear more from anyone or see a link to a photo or video.  I’d 
also love to know the process behind the lovely gossamer-like veils that 
show faces, knees etc...under them.  HOW D’YOU DO DAT???

marg 

 
marg gurr | 2 Dec 2011 17:01
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: carving hair

Don, good to hear from you on this one, thanks.  Jane and I were just 
discussing the merits of tricking the eye by using the same technique you’ve 
described for things such as eyebrows.  I like the notion of recessing as a 
means of launching into the full mass. This whole play of expectation vs 
reality/outcome can be so clever and compelling.  Actually, what initiated 
our discussion was looking at some of Peter Callesen’s work with paper cuts. 
For those who haven’t seen this, it’s well worth a google all on it’s own, 
but I found it particularly interesting from a sculptural perspective in 
terms of creating work that is ultimately defined by aspects of the creation 
that are somehow removed from the central piece or disguised within it.

marg 

 
Clive Murray-White | 2 Dec 2011 22:39
Favicon

Re: The carving of hair strands

Hi Andrei,

I do hair quite a bit, but in a way I don't do it at all, I kind of rely on the fact that the viewer imagines that
they are looking at hair. In truth its very like drawing the more you try to make it look like hair the less it
actually does. http://murray-white.blogspot.com/2011_08_01_archive.html

Most of the old sculptors found ways of making convincing looking patterns that approximated hair (and
that is by far the easiest way to do it - but I find it too predictable and boring), I'm with Don here, go check
out the old sculptures in your nearest museum and you'll start to get a feel for it - king of hair in my book is
Bernini. The guys that carved all of Rodin's sculpture were pretty good too.

I think the main trick is seeing it as light and shade.

Clive

 
Jeff Watson | 2 Dec 2011 23:54
Picon
Favicon

Two videos on creating a large sculpture

I have just uploaded another video - decidedly amateur since it was 
filmed by me and my spouse - of the making of my sculpture at the Art 
Centre of Kamouraska, Québec. The movie lasts 15 minutes and covers 
the time from delivery of the stone (two tons) to installation in 
front of the Art Centre.
Clive will be shocked by the amateurish way in which the sculpture was 
handled for the installation. Not exactly the safest way to do things, 
but it was all somewhat out of my control. Anyway, the sculpture is 
solidly mounted on an anorthosite stone (two thirds of which is 
solidly buried in concrete)  from part of the Appalachian chain which 
passes by Kamouraska (another two ton hard, hard stone - drilling 3 
holes took almost a day). The maximum height is 3 metres.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mToXzCpOIBo&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

The second video, some of you may have already seen. It is on my 
website and has been on You tube for a while.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvV6FhpndpQ&feature=BFa&list=ULmToXzCpOIBo&lf=mfu_in_order

Cheers,
Jeff

Jeffrey Watson,
150  Bord de l 'Eau Est,
Longueuil, QC. J4H 1A1
(450) 674-6222 Phone
(514) 755-9476 Cell
jeff.watson@...
www.sculpturejeffwatson.com

(Continue reading)

Nigel Ratcliffe-Springall | 3 Dec 2011 09:47
Picon
Favicon

Re: carving strands of hair

Andrei, I share your desire to get better at this! I'm still trying to clamber up the learning curve too, but,
in response to Marg, I've posted a few pictures on Facebook.
To share a couple of things: choose a fine grained marble that is supple enough. The Maenad was carved in a
rush for exhibition and I had to use Naxos marble, which gave me big problems with its coarse grains and
sugary nature and meant I couldn't get the wispiness I was after. Something I'm telling myself in carving
hair is to allow for the loose locks and stray curls when blocking out the shapes - the tendency is to go for
the main shapes and not leave any material for these. The problem is that, at an early stage, a solitary
floating stray wisp of hair needs a disproportionately large lump of marble to be left to allow for it.
Finally, I think it's important to study the behaviour of real hair - where it's growing from etc - treating
it like anatomy. I didn't do enough of that for the maenad carving!.I share Clive's admiration for Bernini
- the hair, for example, on Constanza Bonarelli portrait! And that faint wispy moustache on Francis d'Este!
.Here's the Facebook
link..http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.301547449867044.67895.100000353732897&type=1&l/1318f2ee
    .

.Nigel.        
 		 	   		  

Andrei | 3 Dec 2011 09:45
Picon
Picon

Carving hair


Many thanks, Don, Robin, Clive, Marg!

I understand now the principle of first carving the masses and then the detail
into them. I imagine heaps of very thick ropes draped around a shape, and then
working detail into them. The Greeks and Romans did something like overlapping
fish scales and then composed individual strands into them, very manieristic.

To me it would seem that Emilio Greco uses very unconventional approaches, I
think they work best in bronze, although this here is really cool: 
http://art.findartinfo.com/images/artwork/2006/2/a000733004-001.jpg

Finally, I second Marg in wondering how on earth do you do something like a wet
look in marble... 

This is so good talking to you guys!

Thanks,
Andrei

 
jb Barrow | 4 Dec 2011 00:03
Picon
Favicon

Re: this has been your time to shine...

<p>whats up!<br>I was in need of an alternative this helped me back to my feet this is proof that miracles do
exist imagine what you could do<br><a href="http://eapo.neon.jp/profile/89DanielSpencer/">http://eapo.neon.jp/profile/89DanielSpencer/</a><br>goodbye.</p>

 

Gmane