Favicon

Interactive Mobile Tutorial Apps?

Colleagues/

I am greatly interested in learning of the availability of interactive
mobile tutorial apps.

[I am not interested in tutorials about mobile apps][:-)]

I'm particularly interested in Any/All Interactive Mobile Tutorials that
are Educational and/or Library-related, most particularly those relating
to Library Instruction.

BTW: Training Apps Are Also Of Interest As Are Educational Game Apps

I Welcome Any and All Suggestions/Recommendations As Comments On The
Blog Entry At

[ http://tinyurl.com/c58qos  ]

/Gerry 

Gerry McKiernan

Associate Professor

Science and Technology Librarian

Iowa State University Library

Ames IA 50011

(Continue reading)

Picon
Favicon

Re: Leveraging Authority Data in Keyword Searches

The State University Libraries of Florida are using an Endeca catalog -
http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp .  Recently, we implemented a "Did you mean ... " link for title,
author and subject keyword searches.  The system searches the user's term in the authority tables and if
there's a cross-ref match, it displays a "Did you mean ... " for the authorized term.  Instead of populating
the user's search results with hits based on the authorized term, the system allows the user to click and do
a new search if desired.  

Here are some examples:
Search: Roosevelt, Teddy
Did you mean?: Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919

Search: Bush, George H. W.
Did you mean?:  Bush, George, 1924-

Search: JFK
Did you mean?:  Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917-

Search: Dalai Lama
Did you mean?:  Bstan-'dzin-rgya-mtsho, Dalai Lama XIV, 1935-  [the standardized form of the current Dalai
Lama's name]

Search: Mao Tse Tung
Did you mean?:  Mao, Zedong, 1893-1976

Search: Lenin
Did you mean?:  Lenin, Vladimir Il'ich, 1870-1924

Search: Drones
Did you mean?:  Drone aircraft

(Continue reading)

Jonathan Rochkind | 1 May 23:58
Favicon

Re: Leveraging Authority Data in Keyword Searches

Neat!

If you're doing a general keyword search without specifying a field, do 
you get any of those authority-based 'did you means'?

Jonathan

Simpson,Elizabeth Yager wrote:
> The State University Libraries of Florida are using an Endeca catalog -
http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp .  Recently, we implemented a "Did you mean ... " link for title,
author and subject keyword searches.  The system searches the user's term in the authority tables and if
there's a cross-ref match, it displays a "Did you mean ... " for the authorized term.  Instead of populating
the user's search results with hits based on the authorized term, the system allows the user to click and do
a new search if desired.  
>
> Here are some examples:
> Search: Roosevelt, Teddy
> Did you mean?: Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919
>
> Search: Bush, George H. W.
> Did you mean?:  Bush, George, 1924-
>
> Search: JFK
> Did you mean?:  Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917-
>
> Search: Dalai Lama
> Did you mean?:  Bstan-'dzin-rgya-mtsho, Dalai Lama XIV, 1935-  [the standardized form of the current
Dalai Lama's name]
>
> Search: Mao Tse Tung
(Continue reading)

Picon

Another nail in the coffin

Another nail in the library coffin, especially the academic ones ;

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TIOH80Qg7Q

Organisations and people are slowly turning into data producers, not
book producers.

Alex
--

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps
------------------------------------------ http://shelter.nu/blog/ --------

Tim Spalding | 4 May 06:39

Re: Another nail in the coffin

Count me in as a Wolfram Alpha naysayer. A "computable almanac" isn't
that useful, and its not a "step" to anything. Seemingly minor
increases in the intellectual complexity of a question require
astronomically better data, data models and algorithms, if they are
even possible to "compute." The answer, if there is an answer, lies in
Norvig's "unreasonable effectiveness of data,"[1] not in any
combination of "curated" data and "millions of lines of code."

Just an opinion!

Tim

[1] http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2009/03/unreasonable-effectiveness-of-data.html

On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Alexander Johannesen
<alexander.johannesen <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Another nail in the library coffin, especially the academic ones ;
>
>   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TIOH80Qg7Q
>
> Organisations and people are slowly turning into data producers, not
> book producers.

Tim Spalding | 4 May 08:27

Re: Leveraging Authority Data in Keyword Searches

May I suggest there is something Orwellian about the phrase "did you
mean?" when applied to politically-charged terms? It suggests to me
not merely that resources can be found under a given heading, but that
the searcher's own term is invalid and wrong.

Many may feel comfortable delegitimizing "partial birth abortion" and
"socialized medicine" but—to take a few examples from Sanford
Berman—UFL still has two items with the LCSH "Yellow peril." 137 under
"Jewish Question" and 2 under "Catholics as Scientists."

So far, I haven't been able to make the catalog suggest I'm after
information on the Yellow Peril, though, and indeed when I search for
the phrase, it suggests I mean "Walleye (Fish)." Are you mining your
own subject headings or doing it against a list of currently-approved
ones?

Tim

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Simpson,Elizabeth Yager
<betsys <at> uflib.ufl.edu> wrote:
> The State University Libraries of Florida are using an Endeca catalog -
http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp .  Recently, we implemented a "Did you mean ... " link for title,
author and subject keyword searches.  The system searches the user's term in the authority tables and if
there's a cross-ref match, it displays a "Did you mean ... " for the authorized term.  Instead of
populating the user's search results with hits based on the authorized term, the system allows the user to
click and do a new search if desired.

Weinheimer Jim | 4 May 09:45

Re: Another nail in the coffin

First, thanks to Alex for pointing this out. I've been reading a lot about Wolfram Alpha and wondering what
it is, and now we can see. 

While I can't class myself as a naysayer, I do see that this project does not really overlap with
librarianship (or it doesn't have to, anyway). From what I see of Wolfram Alpha, it is designed to be a giant
"answer machine" which will respond to natural language questions to provide someone an answer.

With libraries and especially library catalogs, they are designed with different purposes in mind. The
library catalog is *supposed* to allow users to get an idea of what are the intellectual holdings of a
specific collection. Therefore, it should allow someone who doesn't know what is in the local
collection, to browse *intellectually* the contents of that collection. The system was designed
originally to work with printed book catalogs and then was transferred to cards. Therefore, if someone
browses a concept such as, Caesar, Julius, they should see a number of things that they would never have
thought of. Here is the search for Caesar, Julius in the Princeton University catalog (I hope this works):
http://catalog.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?Search_Arg=caesar,+julius&Search_Code=SUBJ_&PID=pBk_3VVdEBBqDUNdxAf9TL_8IsNC&SEQ=20090504031621&CNT=50&HIST=1

and through the subdivisions, you see concepts such as "Adversaries," "Cult," "Death and burial,"
"Language" and so on. This is what is I mean by an "intellectual browse:" the user can get an idea of the
richness of a specific collection, and become aware of things that he or she would never have thought of
independently. This goal is quite different from Wolfram Alpha (an answer machine). 

The traditional library methods can be very powerful (even though it can be done through physical means
through the arrangement of cards) and, I suspect, this power is what Bernard has in mind when he asks
whether browsing is necessary or not. I have not seen any system that attempts to replicate this
automatically anywhere, except possibly Vivisimo, and the results are bizarre (IMHO).

Now, does the library catalog succeed today? Back in the old days, transferring the original methods from
the book catalog to the card catalog resulted in several problems. Then, transferring that same browsing
capability onto the web has not succeeded (and probably will not succeed) in my opinion. If it is assumed
that we need to retain the power of traditional browsing--which is my hope--different methods must be found.
(Continue reading)

Picon

Re: Another nail in the coffin

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 17:45, Weinheimer Jim <j.weinheimer <at> aur.edu> wrote:
> While I can't class myself as a naysayer, I do see that this project does not really overlap with
librarianship (or it doesn't have to, anyway). From what I see of Wolfram Alpha, it is designed to be a giant
"answer machine" which will respond to natural language questions to provide someone an answer.

About half-way through in the Q&A there's a question about its role
with libraries, and Wolfram answers that they've got about 90% of all
reference library enquiries covered. The only thing they don't really
do (and don't want to do) is details about people.

Alex
--

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps
------------------------------------------ http://shelter.nu/blog/ --------

Weinheimer Jim | 4 May 10:37

Re: Another nail in the coffin

Alexander Johannesen wrote:

> About half-way through in the Q&A there's a question about its role
> with libraries, and Wolfram answers that they've got about 90% of all
> reference library enquiries covered. The only thing they don't really
> do (and don't want to do) is details about people.

He's advertising his product, so naturally he is going to say that reference librarians are
semi-obsolete. Of course, that is the sort of question that a reference librarian should answer. I wonder
more precisely what he means by 90% of all reference library enquiries?

For example, one of the most often asked questions is "Where is the bathroom?" In my own experience, I get the
most questions concerning systems: "How do I get onto JSTOR?" For these and for "ready-reference"
questions such as, "How tall is the Eiffel Tower?" and "What is the capital of Syria?" it might do fine, but
Google can do that pretty well, too. You never really needed a reference librarian for those sorts of
questions. 

It's only when people have exhausted every avenue they can think of that they come to ask a reference
question, and they are more-or-less desperate. That's when they tend to listen more and you can really
help them at that point. After that, these same people have no problem at all coming back and asking you more questions.

Research demonstrates over and over that people believe they are very good or expert in searching
information. As a consequence, asking that first real, reference question seems to be equivalent to
admitting intellectual failure and it can be quite an obstacle for many.

What I'm saying is that people have a lot more problems than they let on when trying to find information. This
is another discussion though.

Jim Weinheimer

(Continue reading)

Larmore, Dustin P. | 4 May 13:59
Favicon

Re: Leveraging Authority Data in Keyword Searches

For most of these headings, the "Did you mean?" terminology seems OK, but I can envision a problem with the
reference from Partial birth abortion.  If I were searching that term and I didn't know that dilatation and
extraction abortion is another term for partial birth abortion, I might think, "The library must not have
any works on partial birth abortion, so it is directing me to a related topic."

I like Innovative Interfaces' handling of cross-references.

"Partial-birth abortion" is not used in this library's catalog.
Dilatation and extraction abortion is used instead.
Try a search for Dilatation and extraction abortion.

The last heading is hyperlinked to conduct a search on the authorized term.

Dustin P. Larmore
Cataloging and Metadata Services Librarian
Old Dominion University Libraries
Norfolk, VA 23529
E-mail: dlarmore <at> odu.edu
Phone: (757) 683-4340

-----Original Message-----
From: Next generation catalogs for libraries [mailto:NGC4LIB <at> LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Simpson,Elizabeth Yager
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 5:52 PM
To: NGC4LIB <at> LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] Leveraging Authority Data in Keyword Searches

The State University Libraries of Florida are using an Endeca catalog -
http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp .  Recently, we implemented a "Did you mean ... " link for title,
author and subject keyword searches.  The system searches the user's term in the authority tables and if
(Continue reading)


Gmane