2 Feb 19:27
Re: The Ideology of Free Culture and the Grammar of Sabotage
It is true that buzzwords themselves do not guarantee content-free texts. What
are buzzwords anyway? They are indices into dictionary entries available only
to those "in" the field. Often these entries do not bring any semantic value,
after all only so many new concepts are invented every year, with buzzword
production outnumbering the real demand by many orders of magnitude. Their only
use is to certify that you've been there. Like bumper stickers (I wonder if
authors of these texts are also in bumper stickers?)
So filtering would have to be done in the same way e-mail spam filtering is
done today: correlation from a large number of sources; blacklisting; and only
then keywords ("post marxism" instead of "viagra"). It's a hard problem, and my
feeble word-pair frequency attempt cannot solve it. For example, what follows
here is a permutation of the original text with the same word-pair fingerprint.
Does it have more, less or the same content as the original? (It definitely is
more original 
== start ==
Against the digital culture in our wallet
A closer Bataille is vast but also the same excess, of digitalism.
What I call this sense Creative commons do not a large torrents of a
religious sect it is not produced: by the asymmetrical arrow this text
tries to others command: surplus value or a market in as the ghost of
each generate and complicity of autonomous commons, economy and can be
built and especially from the crisis European media discourse, Bataille
himself considered a new theory of your work behind and the dot com
bubble exploited a dynamic space of the amphibious nature of the market
of its commons.
(Continue reading)
RSS Feed