17 Nov 2004 12:04
Re: Leatherman Response
Ty <texicanradio <at> sbcglobal.net>
2004-11-17 11:04:52 GMT
2004-11-17 11:04:52 GMT
It was not an attack on a member. Seems to me, maybe you made a judgement on insufficient information. Bad call. Ty David Holm <david.holm <at> rivcom.net> wrote: Because Yahoo in it's infinite wisdom dropped some posts to me and I didn't see the previous messages to know what was going on, and it appeared to be an attack on a member. Which is against the rules if you don't remember. --Dave ô¿ô¬ N7DRH ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ty" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [concealed] Leatherman Response Why on earth? It's an on-topic as the day is long. Ty(Continue reading)
Ty
Ken Grubb <ken_grubb <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
RSS Feed