1 Jun 2005 01:00
Re: [ebbc-talk] Re: The High Cost of BART
--- Roger Marquis <marquis@...> wrote: > > You may be forgetting that Concord and Richmond were > also outlying stations when they were built, > serving relatively few passengers at that time. > Why would you build for today's capacity when you > know that demand will only continue to grow? Actually, BART will soon be maxed-out on the Concord line. BART's predictions show that within about 10 years, nobody will be able to board a train beyond Rockridge during the morning commute. By contrast, the "RER" example I mentioned moves several million passengers per day. Each double- decker, 8-car RER trainset carries 3,600 passengers, vs. 1500 per 10-car BART trainset. > > > For lower-density areas, conventional rail is the > > norm. For very little money, an existing freight > > line can be upgraded to passenger rail standards, > > by refurbishing the rails and ballast, installing > > platforms, and purchasing a few trainsets. > > What existing freight lines are you referring to? Much of BART was laid out along existing ROW; i.e. http://world.nycsubway.org/perl/show?19659(Continue reading)
RSS Feed