bruce ohlson | 1 Jan 2004 20:07
Picon
Favicon

[ebbc-talk] Bicycle Accident Research project

Fellow Cyclists,

This bicycle accident research questionnaire came across my computer the 
other day.  You might find it of interest.

Enjoy bicycling during the new year.

Sincerely,

~0le

Subject :
Accident questionnaire

>From :  Seemar@...
Reply-To :  Seemar@...

Dear Bicyclists:

Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, civil engineering department is 
completing a research project on construction and maintenance standards of 
bike trails throughout the state for the Illinois Department of 
Transportation under the direction of Dr. Greg Luttrell.
As a part of my master's program thesis Dr. Luttrell encouraged me to study 
the non-motor bicycle accidents occurring to the bicyclists. Numerous 
analyses have been completed of bike accidents involving motor vehicles 
through the use of vehicle accident reports.  Non-motor bike accidents do 
not have formal reporting mechanisms.  Non-motor vehicle accidents 
constitute more than 90 percent of the bicycle accidents in the United 
States (based on emergency room research). It is therefore vital that we 
(Continue reading)

Scott Mace | 3 Jan 2004 01:33

[ebbc-talk] Re: [bfbc] Maximize BART parking charges now!

At 10:40 PM 12/28/2003, David Coolidge wrote:
>Realistically, there has to be a balance point between subsidizing 
>automobile use and reducing ridership on the trains.  If parking is too 
>difficult, expensive, or just non-existant, some BART users will just go 
>back to driving.   This calls for a careful analysis before policies are 
>made, and the analysis ought to be regularly updated to track evolving 
>situations.   Getting BART out of the parking business is probably a good 
>idea in the long run, but it seems to me that it has to be phased, 
>especially since so much of the area that BART serves is suburbs that were 
>designed to be auto-dependent.

I absolutely agree. That's why, when I was writing the petition you can 
read at http://www.petitiononline.com/bart2/petition.html, I deliberately 
rejected the heavy-handed approach taken by local chapters of the Sierra 
Club, as well as TALC, and numerous bicycle activists; that is, they want 
to charge for all parking spaces at all BART lots. That's unrealistic and 
we do need a more flexible approach. Having said that, it's criminal that 
the BART board won't even consider any sort of daily parking charges at 
maxed-out lots in the East Bay, while at the same time pushing through not 
only a 15 percent fare increase within 12 months, but also (I believe) a 
25-cent surcharge (not sure if this is in effect yet) for seismic work, 
which discriminates heavy against urban and lower-income riders who are 
only going a station or two. That's right, punish those with shorter 
commutes once again.

The time for careful analysis, I believe, is over. It's time for the BART 
board to take action. Not blind ignorant action of course, but intelligent 
action, and rapid action. Think of it this way: If Arnold can raise "fees" 
at "people parks" then the BART board sure as heck can raise fees for car 
parks, especially where demand exceeds supply.
(Continue reading)

Jon Spangler | 6 Jan 2004 10:42
Picon
Favicon

[ebbc-talk] Fwd: Where is the gas in 2030?

Dear All,

The depletion of our oil reserves is not really "fresh" news, but the following story is an excellent reminder to start thinking ahead to leaner times... (As if they aren't lean enough already for some of us!  :-(  And Paul's comment about the Regional Transportation Plan needing to factor in much higher gas proces is dead on target...)

Regards,

Jon
+++++++++++++++++
Jon Spangler, Writer/Editor
Linda Hudson Writing
PH   510-864-0370
FAX 510-864-2144
1037 San Antonio Avenue
Alameda, CA 94501-3963


Status:  U
Sensitivity:
To: sfbike-oneqCxcDAinQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
From: paulw-yS+BnapxVy8@public.gmane.org
Subject: Where is the gas in 2030?
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:44:20 -0800
Reply-To: paulw-yS+BnapxVy8@public.gmane.org
X-Topica-Id: <1073367871.inmta006.8767.1330612>
List-Help: <http://topica.com/lists/sfbike-oneqCxcDAinQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sfbike-unsubscribe-oneqCxcDAinQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
----- Forwarded by Paul Wendt

(The UK's former Minister of the Environment writes on running into oil
shortages sooner than many think: "...the combined model suggests a
peak from all sources of about 90m bpd around 2015." MTC's 25 year RTP
ought to think about very expensive gasoline.)

COMMENT: Plan now for a world without oil

By Michael Meacher
Financial Times; Jan 05, 2004

Four months ago, Britain's oil imports overtook its exports,
underlining a decline in North Sea oil production that was already well
under way. North Sea oil output peaked at about 2.9m barrels per day in
1999, and has been predicted to fall to only 1.6m bpd by 2007. Even the
discovery of the new Buzzard field, the biggest British oil find in a
decade, with a total of some 500m barrels recoverable, will not alter
by much the overall picture of dwindling resources.

This prospect would not be so bleak were it not that similar trends are
now becoming manifest around the globe. The three main oil-producing
regions are Opec, the former Soviet Union, and the rest of the world.
According to papers presented at the latest annual meetings of the
Association for the Study of Peak Oil, Opec's future production is
expected to peak in 2020 at about 40-45m bpd. Under-production in the
former Soviet Union in the 1990s has been followed by a new surge in
east Siberia and Sakhalin. Together with new discoveries in the
Caspian, this will yield a peak of about 10m bpd in 2010.

Combining the models for Opec, the former Soviet Union and the
remaining 40 or more major oil-producing countries puts ultimate world
oil recovery - past and future - at some 2,200bn barrels, with
production peaking at about 80m bpd between 2010 and 2020. To this may
be added non-conventional oil and other liquids brought into commercial
production by the rising price as oil becomes more scarce. These
include oil from coal and shale, bitumen and derived synthetics, heavy
and extra-heavy oil, deep-water oil, polar oil and liquids from gas
fields and gas plants. These sources, though at very much greater cost,
could provide an ultimate recovery of about 800bn barrels and might
peak in 2050 at around 20m bpd. But the combined model suggests a peak
from all sources of about 90m bpd around 2015.

Today we enjoy a daily production of 75m bpd. But to meet projected
demand in 2015, we would need to open new oilfields that can give an
additional 60m bpd. This is frankly impossible. It would require the
equivalent of more than 10 new regions, each the size of the North Sea.
Maybe Iraq with enormous new investments will increase production by 6m
bpd, and the rest of the Middle East might be able to do the same. But
to suggest that the rest of the world could produce an extra 40m
barrels daily is just moonshine.

These calculations place the coming oil crunch some time between 2010
and 2015, perhaps earlier. The reserves in the world's super-giant and
giant oilfields are dwindling at an average rate of 4-6 per cent a
year. No more big frontier regions remain to be explored except the
north and south poles. The production of non-conventional crude oil has
already been initiated at enormous cost in Venezuela's Orinoco belt and
Canada's Athabasca tar sands and ultra-deep waters. Yet no major
primary energy alternative can replace oil and gas in the
short-to-medium term.

The implications of this are mind-blowing, since oil provides 40 per
cent of all traded energy and no less than 90 per cent of transport
fuel. But not only are the motor vehicle and farming industries
dependent on oil, so is national defence. Oil powers the vast network
of planes, tanks, helicopters and ships that provide the basis of each
country's armaments. It is hard to envisage the effects of a radically
reduced oil supply on a modern economy or society. Yet just such a
radical reduction is staring us in the face.

The world faces a stark choice. It can continue down the existing path
of rising oil consumption, trying to pre-empt available remaining oil
supplies, if necessary by military force, but without avoiding a steady
exhaustion of global capacity. Or it could switch to renewable sources
of energy, much more stringent standards of energy efficiency, and a
steady reduction in oil use. The latter course would involve huge new
investment in energy generation and transportation technologies.

The US response to this dilemma is very striking. The National Energy
Policy report prepared by Dick Cheney, US vice-president, in May 2001
proposed the exploitation of untapped reserves in protected wilderness
areas within the US, notably the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in
north-eastern Alaska. The rejection of this extremely contentious
proposal forced President George W. Bush, unwilling to curb America's
ever-growing thirst for oil, to go back on White House rhetoric and
accept the need to increase oil imports from foreign suppliers.

It was a fateful decision. It means that, for the US alone, oil
imports, or imports of other sources of oil, such as natural gas
liquids, will have to rise from 11m bpd to 18.5m bpd by 2020. Securing
that increment of imported oil - the equivalent of total current oil
consumption by China and India combined - has driven an integrated US
oil-military strategy ever since.

There is, however, a fundamental weakness in this policy. Most
countries targeted as a source of increased oil supplies to the US are
riven by deep internal conflicts, strong anti-Americanism, or both.
Iraq is only the first example of the cost - both in cash and in
soldiers' lives - of facing down resistance or fighting resource wars
in key oil-producing regions, a cost that even the US may find
unsustainable.

The conclusion is clear: if we do not immediately plan to make the
switch to renewable energy - faster, and backed by far greater
investment than currently envisaged - then civilisation faces the
sharpest and perhaps most violent dislocation in recent history.
The writer was UK environment minister from 1997 to June 2003

-- --
_______________________________________________
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org mailing list
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org@...
http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org
Rick Rickard | 7 Jan 2004 18:06
Picon

[ebbc-talk] American River Parkway

Although it's not in the east bay, the ARP is familiar to and popular  
with many east bay riders. This article describes the impact of the  
current fiscal crises and the threat that the parkway might be closed.

http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/sacramento/story/8021132p- 
8957363c.html

Rick Rickard

_______________________________________________
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org mailing list
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org@...
http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org

Jon Spangler | 8 Jan 2004 10:16
Picon
Favicon

[ebbc-talk] SF BIKE COALITION "SUPER-SALE"

Dear Bikies,

Did you miss the big SF Bike Coalition's Winterfest? Do you regret not buying that bike bell or auction item you wanted? Did Santa not bring you that new bike?  You just got another chance! :-)

SFBC has lots of goodies left over that didn't sell.  (See list below.)  Please visit them (9am - 5 pm weekdays at 1095 Market <at> 7th, Ste 215), or call SFBC (415-431-BIKE, x10) for more info on the items below.

Happy (non-WalMart, non-mall) shopping, bikies!

Jon
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SALE SALE SALE!
The party's over, but the great deals have just begun! Stop by SFBC HQ (1095 Market <at> 7th, Ste 215) 9am-5pm weekdays (or call to arrange another time - 431 BIKE x10) to pick up some of the items that didn't sell. First come first served, so hurry in!


$1450 Co-motion 58 cm frame - light green metallic
$1000 Bally Total Fitness 1 year gym membership
$450 Pacific Cycle Schwinn Voyager 17"
$400 Shimano gift cert for shoes & pedals
$325 Mission Yoga 2 month pass
$280 Yakima base rack system
$250 Miller & Miller 1 hour consultation
$60 Thule Speedway 962
$50 Thule Speedway 961
$45 Exploratorium 5 Passes To Tactile Dome
$45 Inertia Hydra Paks
$45 Inertia Hydro Bag
$42 Vision Cycles Answer Shoes
$40 GoreTex Vests
$35 Gary Fisher San Marco Saddle
$30 Various Jerseys
$25 Yerba Buena 2 Family Passes
$25 Yerba Buena 2 Family Passes
$25 Planet Bike Pump
$25 Various Shorts
$25 Soundkase Soundsak
$25 Zoic Sweatshirts
$20 Inertia Rear Rack Pack
$20 Cateye Front & Rear Light Set
$20 Planet Bike Computer
$20 Rainshield Jacket
$20 TRUE Hemp Saddle
$15 Planet Bike U-Lock
$15 Vision Cycles Gloves
$15 Mission Cliffs Belay Safety Package
$15 Velo Press "Tour De France"
$15 Potenza Child's Helmet
$15 Bike Nook Craft Undershirt S
$15 Planet Bike Saddle
$12 Cycleaware Vu Bar
$10 Cycle Publishing "How To Repair Your Bicycle"
$10 Inertia Mini Wedge PacK
$10 Various T-Shirts
$5 Cycleaware Heads Up
$5 Cycleaware Reflex
$5 Bells
$5 Various Socks
$5 Buff Head Wrap
$3 Cycleaware Viewpoint

-- --
+++++++++++++++++
Jon Spangler, Writer/Editor
Linda Hudson Writing
PH   510-864-0370
FAX 510-864-2144
1037 San Antonio Avenue
Alameda, CA 94501-3963
_______________________________________________
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org mailing list
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org@...
http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org
Eric McCaughrin | 9 Jan 2004 10:46
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

[ebbc-talk] Danville to build new trail

Trail aims to make busy road safer

By Linda Davis
Contra Costa Times

DANVILLE -- A tragic accident has spurred the town and
residents to
support building a new mile-long trail near Camino
Tassajara that
would keep bicyclists and pedestrians away from the
sometimes
dangerous road.

The proposed trail -- at an estimated cost of $485,000
-- would
start near Jasmine Way off Camino Tassajara in eastern
Danville and
continue west to Tassajara Ranch Drive. It would
provide a safer way
for nearby Diablo Vista Middle School's students to
pass through
adjoining neighborhoods on their way home or to the
shopping center
at Camino Tassajara and Crow Canyon Road. The trail
would also
provide a safer path for bicyclists, skaters, moms
with strollers
and others, town officials said.

The trail, funded and maintained by the town, would
cross Rassani
Drive, near the site of the October accident that took
the lives of
Troy and Alana Pack, children riding their bicycles on
the sidewalk
along Camino Tassajara when they were killed by a
hit-and-run driver
whose car jumped the curb. The driver, baby nurse
Jimena Barreto, is
awaiting trial.

Town manager Joe Calabrigo said that for years the
town had hoped
to develop a trail link out to Tassajara Ridge
neighborhoods. Other
established neighborhoods in central Danville, such as
Greenbrook,
are honeycombed with interconnecting trails to
schools, parks and
the like.

Money for building and paving the trail will come by
transferring
funds from other capital projects, Calabrigo said. The
bulk of it,
about $300,000, was earmarked for traffic improvements
at Monte Vista
High School on Stone Valley Road. But, says Calabrigo,
that project
is up in the air while the San Ramon Valley school
district works
with developers of the Humphrey Ranch project across
the street from
the school.

The town will have to get permission from the
Southwest Area
Transportation Authority and the county to divert the
$300,000 to
the trail. If there is a delay in obtaining the money,
the town is
prepared to tap another revenue source if necessary,
mayor Newell
Arnerich said. And to finish by this summer, they need
the money
soon, he said.

Added Calabrigo, "The town has the discretion to
reprogram money
that has not been spent."

The other $185,000 would come from unspent
appropriations from the
townwide trails fund and money saved from an
artificial turf parks
project that cost less than anticipated.

A previous obstacle to building the trail --
permission from four
homeowners associations to grant trail easements to
the town -- has
been overcome, Calabrigo said. All four homeowners
associations have
agreed to cooperate.

"Human nature is such that when something like this
(tragedy)
happens, people want to respond by doing something
productive. People
have a greater comfort level with a degree of
separation (from the
road) for cyclists and pedestrians," the town manager
said.

A design engineer has been hired, and easement grants
are being
prepared. The town hopes to get the trail built by
summer.

"Out of a very tragic event comes awareness that there
has always
been a need for more safe pedestrian pathways,"
Arnerich said. "The
community is saying 'this is important to us, yes we
should do this.'
There is an expectation it will get done quickly to
show that a
community cares."

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
_______________________________________________
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org mailing list
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org@...
http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org

Michael Graff | 9 Jan 2004 18:40
Picon
Favicon

re: [ebbc-talk] Danville to build new trail

So they're going to make the road "safer" for cyclists and pedestrians by removing the cyclists and pedestrians?

Eric McCaughrin <emccaughrin@...> wrote:
__________
>Trail aims to make busy road safer
>
>By Linda Davis
>Contra Costa Times
>
>DANVILLE -- A tragic accident has spurred the town and
>residents to
>support building a new mile-long trail near Camino
>Tassajara that
>would keep bicyclists and pedestrians away from the
>sometimes
>dangerous road.

_______________________________________________
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org mailing list
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org@...
http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org

Zach Kaplan | 9 Jan 2004 18:53
Picon
Favicon

Re: [ebbc-talk] Danville to build new trail

on 2004/1/09 9:40, Michael Graff at michael.graff@... wrote:

> So they're going to make the road "safer" for cyclists and pedestrians by
> removing the cyclists and pedestrians?

That was my first thought also.

Zach Kaplan

_______________________________________________
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org mailing list
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org@...
http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org

Roger Marquis | 10 Jan 2004 01:51

Re: [ebbc-talk] Danville to build new trail

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Zach Kaplan wrote:
> > So they're going to make the road "safer" for cyclists and pedestrians by
> > removing the cyclists and pedestrians?
>
> That was my first thought also.

Sounds like Marin.

--

-- 
Roger Marquis
http://www.roble.net/marquis/
_______________________________________________
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org mailing list
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org@...
http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org

John Prelock | 10 Jan 2004 02:22
Picon
Favicon

Re: [ebbc-talk] Danville to build new trail

Roger Marquis wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Zach Kaplan wrote:
> > > So they're going to make the road "safer" for cyclists and pedestrians
> > > by removing the cyclists and pedestrians?
> >
> > That was my first thought also.
>
> Sounds like Marin.
> Roger Marquis

I was wondering about the fact that someone is hit on the sidewalk makes the road
unsafe.  I don't know anything about this road and it may very well be unsafe,
but I'd think a car could jump onto any sidewalk from any road.  That alone
doesn't make a road unsafe IMO.
  -John

_______________________________________________
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org mailing list
ebbc-talk-ebbc.org@...
http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org


Gmane