Jay Belanger | 1 Nov 01:45 2009
Picon

Re: [STUMP] Building StumpWM/CLisp on Ubuntu



2009/10/28 Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf <at> spammotel.com>
Hi all,
....
Any idea?  Maybe reformating my HD and beginning with a fresh install of
Ubuntu 9.10 (tomorrow!)?

Did that work?
I upgraded to Ubuntu 9.10, and now I can't get StumpWM to work.  I've tried building it with clisp I've tried bulding it with sbcl, and I've tried the version that Ubuntu will install, but StumpWM will not run for me.
Perhaps it is time for a new distro...

Jay
 
_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
Stumpwm-devel <at> nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
Matt Cheung | 1 Nov 18:43 2009
Picon

[STUMP] Super_L is no longer working as a prefix key

I have been using the kubuntu stumpwm package for the past few months
with no problems.  Mostly because I was having trouble figuring out how
to get kdm to include stumpwm as a choice.  I even created a
stumpwm.desktop file.  After upgrading to karmic koala I discovered that
Super_L will no longer work as my prefix key.  I checked that Karmic
Koala uses the following version:

Debian Git checkout 1:20090502.git482df740-1 Compiled On Sat Oct 31 10:44:23

From what little I've been able to find, I tried running xmodmap and got
the follwoing output:

xmodmap:  up to 4 keys per modifier, (keycodes in parentheses):

shift       Shift_L (0x32),  Shift_R (0x3e)
lock 
control     Control_L (0x25),  Control_R (0x69)
mod1        Alt_L (0x40),  Alt_R (0x6c),  Meta_L (0xcd)
mod2        Num_Lock (0x4d)
mod3 
mod4        Super_L (0x85),  Super_R (0x86),  Super_L (0xce),  Hyper_L (0xcf)
mod5        ISO_Level3_Shift (0x5c),  Mode_switch (0xcb)

And I ran the modifiers command which gave me the output:

  Meta: mod-1
  Alt: 
Super: mod-4
Hyper: 
AltGr: mod-5

I would appreciate any help getting Super_L as my prefix key again.  It
was nice only needing to hit one key.  Thanks.
Vitaly Mayatskikh | 1 Nov 19:36 2009
Picon

Re: [STUMP] Super_L is no longer working as a prefix key

At Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:43:44 -0800 (PST), Matt Cheung wrote:

> shift       Shift_L (0x32),  Shift_R (0x3e)
> lock 
> control     Control_L (0x25),  Control_R (0x69)
> mod1        Alt_L (0x40),  Alt_R (0x6c),  Meta_L (0xcd)
> mod2        Num_Lock (0x4d)
> mod3 
> mod4        Super_L (0x85),  Super_R (0x86),  Super_L (0xce),  Hyper_L (0xcf)
> mod5        ISO_Level3_Shift (0x5c),  Mode_switch (0xcb)
> 
> And I ran the modifiers command which gave me the output:
> 
>   Meta: mod-1
>   Alt: 
> Super: mod-4
> Hyper: 
> AltGr: mod-5
> 
> I would appreciate any help getting Super_L as my prefix key again.  It
> was nice only needing to hit one key.  Thanks.

You have 2 Super_L, it's a bug in X.org. This should help:

$ xmodmap -e "keycode 206 = Meta_R"

--

-- 
wbr, Vitaly
Matt Cheung | 1 Nov 20:05 2009
Picon

Re: [STUMP] Super_L is no longer working as a prefix key


On Sun, 1 Nov 2009, Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:

> At Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:43:44 -0800 (PST), Matt Cheung wrote:
>
>> shift       Shift_L (0x32),  Shift_R (0x3e)
>> lock
>> control     Control_L (0x25),  Control_R (0x69)
>> mod1        Alt_L (0x40),  Alt_R (0x6c),  Meta_L (0xcd)
>> mod2        Num_Lock (0x4d)
>> mod3
>> mod4        Super_L (0x85),  Super_R (0x86),  Super_L (0xce),  Hyper_L (0xcf)
>> mod5        ISO_Level3_Shift (0x5c),  Mode_switch (0xcb)
>>
>> And I ran the modifiers command which gave me the output:
>>
>>   Meta: mod-1
>>   Alt:
>> Super: mod-4
>> Hyper:
>> AltGr: mod-5
>>
>> I would appreciate any help getting Super_L as my prefix key again.  It
>> was nice only needing to hit one key.  Thanks.
>
> You have 2 Super_L, it's a bug in X.org. This should help:
>
> $ xmodmap -e "keycode 206 = Meta_R"
I tried this and I tried 
$ xmodmap -e "keycode 133 = Meta_R"
and neither works.
>
> -- 
> wbr, Vitaly
>
Vitaly Mayatskikh | 1 Nov 20:23 2009
Picon

Re: [STUMP] Super_L is no longer working as a prefix key

At Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:05:06 -0800 (PST), Matt Cheung wrote:

> > $ xmodmap -e "keycode 206 = Meta_R"
> I tried this and I tried 
> $ xmodmap -e "keycode 133 = Meta_R"
> and neither works.

I have this in ~/.xsession:

setxkbmap -model "pc105" -layout "us,ru(winkeys)" -option "grp:caps_toggle,grp_led:scroll"
xmodmap -e "keycode 206 = Meta_R"
xmodmap -e "keycode 133 = F20"

My prefix key is F20.

--

-- 
wbr, Vitaly
Michael Raskin | 1 Nov 20:32 2009
Picon

Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits

I sparked the discussion that led to change of maintainership model,
great, and I fully support it, but what about commenting on my original
patch?

Michael Raskin wrote:
> 	I noticed that saved layout work strangely if monitor layout changes.
> So I needed a way to script creating a layout relative to whatever head
> it is run on. For this task knowing something about the new frame
> created by split is needed. As its number is set inside split function,
> I found it useful to return it. The patch follows.
Sébastien Vauban | 1 Nov 22:18 2009

Re: [STUMP] Building StumpWM/CLisp on Ubuntu

Hi Jay,

Jay Belanger wrote:
> 2009/10/28 Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@...>
>
>> Any idea? Maybe reformating my HD and beginning with a fresh install of
>> Ubuntu 9.10 (tomorrow!)?
>
> Did that work?
> I upgraded to Ubuntu 9.10, and now I can't get StumpWM to work.  I've tried
> building it with clisp I've tried bulding it with sbcl, and I've tried the
> version that Ubuntu will install, but StumpWM will not run for me.
> Perhaps it is time for a new distro...

I'm running against time... and haven't had the opportunity for the upgrade
yet. Now, I don't risk much into doing the jump to 9.10 as I still can't use
StumpWM in my current config.

I'll tell you when I do.

Best,
  Seb

--

-- 
Sébastien Vauban
Vitaly Mayatskikh | 1 Nov 22:23 2009
Picon

Re: [STUMP] Building StumpWM/CLisp on Ubuntu

At Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:18:02 +0100, Sébastien Vauban wrote:

> I'm running against time... and haven't had the opportunity for the upgrade
> yet. Now, I don't risk much into doing the jump to 9.10 as I still can't use
> StumpWM in my current config.
> 
> I'll tell you when I do.

Does your Ubuntu have SELinux enabled?
--

-- 
wbr, Vitaly
Jay Belanger | 1 Nov 22:41 2009
Picon

Re: [STUMP] Building StumpWM/CLisp on Ubuntu


Hi Sébastien,

>> Did that work?
>> I upgraded to Ubuntu 9.10, and now I can't get StumpWM to work.  I've tried
>> building it with clisp I've tried bulding it with sbcl, and I've tried the
>> version that Ubuntu will install, but StumpWM will not run for me.
>> Perhaps it is time for a new distro...
>
> I'm running against time... and haven't had the opportunity for the upgrade
> yet. Now, I don't risk much into doing the jump to 9.10 as I still can't use
> StumpWM in my current config.
>
> I'll tell you when I do.

Thanks.
I've downgraded to Ubuntu 8.04; I'll stay here until the next LTS, I
suppose, unless StumpWM starts to work on more recent releases.

Jay
Jay Belanger | 1 Nov 22:42 2009
Picon

Re: [STUMP] Building StumpWM/CLisp on Ubuntu


Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih <at> gmail.com> writes:
...
> Does your Ubuntu have SELinux enabled?

I don't know if mine did or not.  Does that cause a problem with
StumpWM?

Jay

Gmane