Re: [STUMP] alive and kicking?
Magnus Henoch <mange <at> freemail.hu>
2005-07-18 14:09:27 GMT
Rohan Nicholls <rohan.nicholls <at> pareto.nl> writes:
> Is this list and indeed stumpwm still alive? I have noticed in a post
> that even the developer does not use it, so does anyone?
I currently don't, and haven't for quite some time. I'd want either
SBCL to run on NetBSD/powerpc (which turned out to be harder than I
thought), or stumpwm to work on clisp (which I haven't tested, and
which would give less type checks).
I have an Arch archive with some hacks. The URL is
http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~henoch/archive-2004/ (I have a 2005
archive as well, but there is no stumpwm in it). The branches are
cvs--0 (I was tracking CVS for a while), stumpwm-- hack--0
(minor bug fixes, and lots of type declarations), and
stumpwm-- netwm--0 (a superset of the hack branch, trying to get
stumpwm to comply with Freedesktop's window manager specification. I
got it to display a panel at the bottom of the screen).