Hello all, Is this list and indeed stumpwm still alive? I have noticed in a post that even the developer does not use it, so does anyone? Just thought I would check as there have been no postings to this list since I signed up over a month ago. Rohan
I used to use it (well, a customized version), but a bug that caused StumpWM to stop grabbing control-keys forced me to go back to ratpoison. A shame, I really like the idea. -- -- Troels "Athas" Henriksen
Rohan Nicholls <rohan.nicholls <at> pareto.nl> writes: > Hello all, > > Is this list and indeed stumpwm still alive? I have noticed in a post > that even the developer does not use it, so does anyone? I use stumpwm everyday. I've done some hacks on it ... but they've never been commited to CVS. In fact, I've a local tla arch of stumpwm here that contains those improvements : if you want I can provide you a tarball of this version. (don't know if i have the time to maintain a public shared repository). -- -- Manuel Giraud
Manuel Giraud wrote: > Rohan Nicholls <rohan.nicholls <at> pareto.nl> writes: > > >>Hello all, >> >>Is this list and indeed stumpwm still alive? I have noticed in a post >>that even the developer does not use it, so does anyone? > > > I use stumpwm everyday. I've done some hacks on it ... but they've never > been commited to CVS. > > In fact, I've a local tla arch of stumpwm here that contains those > improvements : if you want I can provide you a tarball of this > version. (don't know if i have the time to maintain a public shared > repository). > I'd be interested in seeing such a tarball, as well.
Rohan Nicholls <rohan.nicholls <at> pareto.nl> writes: > Is this list and indeed stumpwm still alive? I have noticed in a post > that even the developer does not use it, so does anyone? I currently don't, and haven't for quite some time. I'd want either SBCL to run on NetBSD/powerpc (which turned out to be harder than I thought), or stumpwm to work on clisp (which I haven't tested, and which would give less type checks). I have an Arch archive with some hacks. The URL is http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~henoch/archive-2004/ (I have a 2005 archive as well, but there is no stumpwm in it). The branches are stumpwm--cvs--0 (I was tracking CVS for a while), stumpwm--hack--0 (minor bug fixes, and lots of type declarations), and stumpwm--netwm--0 (a superset of the hack branch, trying to get stumpwm to comply with Freedesktop's window manager specification. I got it to display a panel at the bottom of the screen). Magnus
Kevin Griffin <kevin <at> cavewallarts.com> writes: > I'd be interested in seeing such a tarball, as well. You'll find it here: http://www.cetp.ipsl.fr/~giraud/stumpwm.tar.gz -- -- Manuel Giraud (CNRS/CETP)
Troels Henriksen <athas <at> sigkill.dk> writes: > I used to use it (well, a customized version), but a bug that > caused StumpWM to stop grabbing control-keys forced me to go back to > ratpoison. A shame, I really like the idea. Can you describe the bug? ppl actually using this thing changes EVERYTHING. -Shawn
Shawn Betts <sabetts <at> vcn.bc.ca> writes: > Can you describe the bug? ppl actually using this thing changes EVERYTHING. Sorry, I can't reproduce it reliably. Sometimes, windows just stop grabbing C-t. That is all there is to it. -- -- Troels "Athas" Henriksen
RSS Feed5 | |
|---|---|
8 | |
18 | |
6 | |
7 | |
10 | |
101 | |
18 | |
19 | |
12 | |
14 | |
29 | |
17 | |
40 | |
17 | |
23 | |
25 | |
64 | |
26 | |
23 | |
16 | |
46 | |
34 | |
34 | |
15 | |
108 | |
14 | |
2 | |
12 | |
17 | |
35 | |
25 | |
14 | |
24 | |
28 | |
51 | |
24 | |
20 | |
8 | |
18 | |
46 | |
113 | |
37 | |
95 | |
34 | |
52 | |
53 | |
47 | |
89 | |
61 | |
29 | |
42 | |
40 | |
33 | |
131 | |
52 | |
98 | |
138 | |
75 | |
143 | |
30 | |
39 | |
79 | |
38 | |
14 | |
5 | |
55 | |
10 | |
19 | |
32 | |
5 | |
19 | |
8 | |
1 | |
20 | |
20 | |
7 | |
29 | |
18 | |
11 | |
4 | |
8 | |
8 | |
34 | |
36 | |
1 | |
4 | |
1 | |
1 | |
8 | |
2 | |
14 | |
7 | |
1 | |
11 | |
11 | |
4 | |
2 | |
8 | |
5 | |
2 | |
14 | |
13 | |
1 |
