Christopher Michael | 1 Aug 01:16 2011
Picon
Picon

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Ecore XCB

On 07/30/2011 06:36 PM, Boris Faure wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:10, Christopher Michael
> <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>  wrote:
> […]
>> 2) It may not build on your system (tho it builds on all boxes I have
>> tried so far).
>
> It doesn't build on my boxes (gentoo and arch linux up-to-date).
I find that very strange since all of the initial development that I did 
was on a gentoo box. If I had to guess, I would say you are using 
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 to pull in masked packages...In which case, you are 
pulling in a development version of XCB and yes it will not build 
against that.

> I've got xcb 1.7 and it introduced a split up of xcb-util.
> I've attached a patch to make ecore_xcb compatible with xcb 1.7.
> I haven't committed it since it would break your setup.
While I appreciate the work/effort that went into your patch, I cannot 
put it in svn because that would break building for normal distros that 
use 'current' versions of xcb, not 'bleeding edge' versions. Most normal 
distros are still shipping 0.3.6 version of the XCB libraries. When they 
start shipping 0.3.8 by default, then I will gladly put this in svn, but 
until then, it Cannot go in because while it may fix building for your 
'bleeding edge' setup, it breaks building for everyone else :(

dh

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
(Continue reading)

Mike Blumenkrantz | 1 Aug 01:29 2011

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Ecore XCB

On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:16:35 -0400
Christopher Michael <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net> wrote:

> On 07/30/2011 06:36 PM, Boris Faure wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:10, Christopher Michael
> > <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>  wrote:
> > […]
> >> 2) It may not build on your system (tho it builds on all boxes I have
> >> tried so far).
> >
> > It doesn't build on my boxes (gentoo and arch linux up-to-date).
> I find that very strange since all of the initial development that I did 
> was on a gentoo box. If I had to guess, I would say you are using 
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 to pull in masked packages...In which case, you are 
> pulling in a development version of XCB and yes it will not build 
> against that.
> 
> > I've got xcb 1.7 and it introduced a split up of xcb-util.
> > I've attached a patch to make ecore_xcb compatible with xcb 1.7.
> > I haven't committed it since it would break your setup.
> While I appreciate the work/effort that went into your patch, I cannot 
> put it in svn because that would break building for normal distros that 
> use 'current' versions of xcb, not 'bleeding edge' versions. Most normal 
> distros are still shipping 0.3.6 version of the XCB libraries. When they 
> start shipping 0.3.8 by default, then I will gladly put this in svn, but 
> until then, it Cannot go in because while it may fix building for your 
> 'bleeding edge' setup, it breaks building for everyone else :(
> 
> dh
> 
(Continue reading)

Christopher Michael | 1 Aug 01:32 2011
Picon
Picon

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Ecore XCB

On 07/31/2011 07:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:16:35 -0400
> Christopher Michael<cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>  wrote:
>
>> On 07/30/2011 06:36 PM, Boris Faure wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:10, Christopher Michael
>>> <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>   wrote:
>>> […]
>>>> 2) It may not build on your system (tho it builds on all boxes I have
>>>> tried so far).
>>>
>>> It doesn't build on my boxes (gentoo and arch linux up-to-date).
>> I find that very strange since all of the initial development that I did
>> was on a gentoo box. If I had to guess, I would say you are using
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 to pull in masked packages...In which case, you are
>> pulling in a development version of XCB and yes it will not build
>> against that.
>>
>>> I've got xcb 1.7 and it introduced a split up of xcb-util.
>>> I've attached a patch to make ecore_xcb compatible with xcb 1.7.
>>> I haven't committed it since it would break your setup.
>> While I appreciate the work/effort that went into your patch, I cannot
>> put it in svn because that would break building for normal distros that
>> use 'current' versions of xcb, not 'bleeding edge' versions. Most normal
>> distros are still shipping 0.3.6 version of the XCB libraries. When they
>> start shipping 0.3.8 by default, then I will gladly put this in svn, but
>> until then, it Cannot go in because while it may fix building for your
>> 'bleeding edge' setup, it breaks building for everyone else :(
>>
>> dh
(Continue reading)

Mike Blumenkrantz | 1 Aug 01:35 2011

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Ecore XCB

On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:32:46 -0400
Christopher Michael <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net> wrote:

> On 07/31/2011 07:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:16:35 -0400
> > Christopher Michael<cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>  wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/30/2011 06:36 PM, Boris Faure wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:10, Christopher Michael
> >>> <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>   wrote:
> >>> […]
> >>>> 2) It may not build on your system (tho it builds on all boxes I have
> >>>> tried so far).
> >>>
> >>> It doesn't build on my boxes (gentoo and arch linux up-to-date).
> >> I find that very strange since all of the initial development that I did
> >> was on a gentoo box. If I had to guess, I would say you are using
> >> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 to pull in masked packages...In which case, you are
> >> pulling in a development version of XCB and yes it will not build
> >> against that.
> >>
> >>> I've got xcb 1.7 and it introduced a split up of xcb-util.
> >>> I've attached a patch to make ecore_xcb compatible with xcb 1.7.
> >>> I haven't committed it since it would break your setup.
> >> While I appreciate the work/effort that went into your patch, I cannot
> >> put it in svn because that would break building for normal distros that
> >> use 'current' versions of xcb, not 'bleeding edge' versions. Most normal
> >> distros are still shipping 0.3.6 version of the XCB libraries. When they
> >> start shipping 0.3.8 by default, then I will gladly put this in svn, but
> >> until then, it Cannot go in because while it may fix building for your
(Continue reading)

Christopher Michael | 1 Aug 01:40 2011
Picon
Picon

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Ecore XCB

On 07/31/2011 07:35 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:32:46 -0400
> Christopher Michael<cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>  wrote:
>
>> On 07/31/2011 07:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:16:35 -0400
>>> Christopher Michael<cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 07/30/2011 06:36 PM, Boris Faure wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:10, Christopher Michael
>>>>> <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>    wrote:
>>>>> […]
>>>>>> 2) It may not build on your system (tho it builds on all boxes I have
>>>>>> tried so far).
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't build on my boxes (gentoo and arch linux up-to-date).
>>>> I find that very strange since all of the initial development that I did
>>>> was on a gentoo box. If I had to guess, I would say you are using
>>>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 to pull in masked packages...In which case, you are
>>>> pulling in a development version of XCB and yes it will not build
>>>> against that.
>>>>
>>>>> I've got xcb 1.7 and it introduced a split up of xcb-util.
>>>>> I've attached a patch to make ecore_xcb compatible with xcb 1.7.
>>>>> I haven't committed it since it would break your setup.
>>>> While I appreciate the work/effort that went into your patch, I cannot
>>>> put it in svn because that would break building for normal distros that
>>>> use 'current' versions of xcb, not 'bleeding edge' versions. Most normal
>>>> distros are still shipping 0.3.6 version of the XCB libraries. When they
>>>> start shipping 0.3.8 by default, then I will gladly put this in svn, but
(Continue reading)

Mike Blumenkrantz | 1 Aug 02:05 2011

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Ecore XCB

On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:40:55 -0400
Christopher Michael <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net> wrote:

> On 07/31/2011 07:35 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:32:46 -0400
> > Christopher Michael<cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>  wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/31/2011 07:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:16:35 -0400
> >>> Christopher Michael<cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>   wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 07/30/2011 06:36 PM, Boris Faure wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:10, Christopher Michael
> >>>>> <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>    wrote:
> >>>>> […]
> >>>>>> 2) It may not build on your system (tho it builds on all boxes I have
> >>>>>> tried so far).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It doesn't build on my boxes (gentoo and arch linux up-to-date).
> >>>> I find that very strange since all of the initial development that I did
> >>>> was on a gentoo box. If I had to guess, I would say you are using
> >>>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 to pull in masked packages...In which case, you are
> >>>> pulling in a development version of XCB and yes it will not build
> >>>> against that.
> >>>>
> >>>>> I've got xcb 1.7 and it introduced a split up of xcb-util.
> >>>>> I've attached a patch to make ecore_xcb compatible with xcb 1.7.
> >>>>> I haven't committed it since it would break your setup.
> >>>> While I appreciate the work/effort that went into your patch, I cannot
> >>>> put it in svn because that would break building for normal distros that
(Continue reading)

David Seikel | 1 Aug 02:12 2011
X-Face
Picon

Re: [E-devel] Ecore XCB

On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:05:50 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz
<mike <at> zentific.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:40:55 -0400
> Christopher Michael <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> > On 07/31/2011 07:35 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > > On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:32:46 -0400
> > > Christopher Michael<cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>  wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 07/31/2011 07:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > >>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:16:35 -0400
> > >>> Christopher Michael<cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>   wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 07/30/2011 06:36 PM, Boris Faure wrote:
> > >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:10, Christopher Michael
> > >>>>> <cpmichael1 <at> comcast.net>    wrote:
> > >>>>> […]
> > >>>>>> 2) It may not build on your system (tho it builds on all
> > >>>>>> boxes I have tried so far).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> It doesn't build on my boxes (gentoo and arch linux
> > >>>>> up-to-date).
> > >>>> I find that very strange since all of the initial development
> > >>>> that I did was on a gentoo box. If I had to guess, I would say
> > >>>> you are using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 to pull in masked
> > >>>> packages...In which case, you are pulling in a development
> > >>>> version of XCB and yes it will not build against that.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I've got xcb 1.7 and it introduced a split up of xcb-util.
(Continue reading)

Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri | 1 Aug 04:22 2011

Re: [E-devel] European Tour -- BEERS?

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<barbieri <at> profusion.mobi> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:41 AM, michael bouchaud
> <michael.bouchaud <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2011/7/27 Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail <at> free.fr>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> >> <barbieri <at> profusion.mobi> wrote:
> >> > Hi European dudes, how are you doing?
> >>
> >> > As some IRC folks know, I'll be in Europe for a series of events and
> >> > would like to meet you for a beer night (I have meetings during the
> >> > day). Let me know what can be arranged on the following dates (all in
> >> > August):
> >> >
> >> > Paris:
> >> >   - Arrival: 3, afternoon
> >> >   - Departure: 5, afternoon
> >>
> >> So maybe the 3 or 4th, we can setup a E-dinner in Paris. Which day do
> >> you prefer ? Where are you staying in Paris ?
> >>
> >> > Berlin: there to represent Enlightenment in the Desktop Summit 2011,
> >> > yay!
> >> >   - Arrival: 5, night
> >> >   - Departure: 9, night
> >>
> >> Sounds like many of us will be there, that's a good thing. Some
> >> enlightenned german to ?
(Continue reading)

Mike McCormack | 1 Aug 04:33 2011

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] ecore: Add basic thread safety

On 07/29/2011 05:56 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:

> Then take that pseudo example :
> 
> Eina_Bool _timer_in_main_loop(void *data)
> {
>    ....;
     lock_data_mutex();
     if (!data_was_deleted)
       {
>        free(data);
       }
     data_was_deleted = Eina_True;
     unlock_data_mutex();
>    return 0;
> }
> 
> void bad_idea()
> {
>    tuttut = ecore_timer_add(unlucky, _timer_in_main_loop, something);
>    ...;
> 
>    if (bad_happen)
>       {
          lock_data_mutex();
          if (!data_was_deleted)
            {
>             ecore_timer_del(tuttut);
>             free(something);
            }
(Continue reading)

Jihoon Kim | 1 Aug 08:04 2011

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] notify immodule to know the cursor location

Thanks, Raster.

In the current edje_entry, there are some bugs related to sequence and miss
to call '_edje_entry_imf_cursor_info_set()'.
Cursor geometry information should be transferred after
ecore_imf_context_focus_in API is called.

This patch will resolve those bugs.
Would you please apply this patch?

-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [mailto:raster <at> rasterman.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 2:56 PM
To: Jihoon Kim
Cc: enlightenment-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] notify immodule to know the cursor location

On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:22:14 +0900 Jihoon Kim <jihoon48.kim <at> samsung.com>
said:

hmm. patch didn't apply cleanly, so I had to manually patch in a lot of
rejections (12 of them), but I've put it in and fixed a warning as well.
thanks
very much! :)

> Hi, EFL developers.
> 
> In immodule, the cursor location is needed to move the word candidate
> window.
> In this patch, calling ecore_imf_context_cursor_location_set lets immodule
(Continue reading)


Gmane