4 Mar 2004 03:22
[E-devel] Re: [e-users] E-based distro->build out of what?
Carsten Haitzler <raster <at> rasterman.com>
2004-03-04 02:22:53 GMT
2004-03-04 02:22:53 GMT
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:40 -0800 (PST) Jonathan Charnas <goeland_86 <at> yahoo.fr> babbled: > I'm no expert about this, but I really like the idea. I was hoping to > switch distros myself sometime soon (soon meaning within 4 months). > As a mandrake user, I can tell you what I like and what I don't like: > Likes: > ease of installation > frequent updates, whether security or just new version of a program > urpmi tool (kinda like apt, but different, they have a gui for it too) > ease to install E > > Dislikes: > configuration tools not really adequate for non newbie users > difficulty to install new programs through rpms ( always have to be > <blabla>.ix86.mdk.rpm, not any rpm, their names and deps are different) > > sometimes hard to compile programs because libs in path have a version # > to it, have to make simlinks to have a correct compile. > > rpm based distro. > > > All this to say that I would personally love see a distro of the same kind > as gentoo, only a little easier to install (presets for various machines > or hardware for instance). If I hadn't run into so many difficulties > trying to install gentoo the first time, I would keep running it. The > thing with gentoo is it installs only what you need, and compiled for your > needs. In my opinion it's the best idea. What could make it easier would > be a text configuration utility that asks for your hardware and sets the(Continue reading)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.
RSS Feed