headers
dscher | 3 Nov 09:38
Picon

Re: Can't access Zope/Plone on VPS - buildout.cfg problem?


Okay, so it updated, even though I forgot to copy the updating message and
when I run the bin/buildout now this is what it says:
--------------------
Updating plone.
Updating zope2.
Updating productdistros.
Updating zeoserver.
Updating client1.
Updating client2.
Updating zopepy.
Updating chown.
chown: Running 
chmod 600 .installed.cfg
touch /opt/Plone-3.1/zeocluster/var/log/zeoserver.log
find /opt/Plone-3.1/zeocluster -type d -name var -exec chown -R plone \{\}
\;
find /opt/Plone-3.1/zeocluster -type d -name LC_MESSAGES -exec chown -R
plone \{\} \;
find /opt/Plone-3.1/zeocluster -name runzope -exec chown plone \{\} \;
Updating unifiedinstaller.
Updating precompile.
  precompiling python scripts in /opt/Plone-3.1/zeocluster/products
  precompiling python scripts in
/opt/Plone-3.1/zeocluster/parts/productdistros
  precompiling python scripts in /opt/Plone-3.1/zeocluster/parts/plone

--------------------

granted when I go to www.mydomain.com:1099/manage nothing comes up.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
skourem | 10 Nov 12:00
Picon

Plone migration from Windows to Linux - Read-only filesystem problem


Hello Plone users,

I've just migrated a Plone chunk from Windows to an Ubuntu Server by
transferring the data.fs and Products files. The Plone site on the new
server us running ok. However, when i log in as manager and try to edit
things i get a security error, as follows: [Errno 30] Read-only file system

Could you help me on this?

Thanks in advance!

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Plone-migration-from-Windows-to-Linux---Read-only-filesystem-problem-tp1480038p1480038.html
Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Mayank Mathur | 10 Nov 12:20
Favicon

Re: Plone migration from Windows to Linux - Read-only filesystem problem

Ru running instance as root user or some other user ?
probably, issues with permissions on File System.

Regards,
Mayank Mathur

skourem wrote:
> Hello Plone users,
>
> I've just migrated a Plone chunk from Windows to an Ubuntu Server by
> transferring the data.fs and Products files. The Plone site on the new
> server us running ok. However, when i log in as manager and try to edit
> things i get a security error, as follows: [Errno 30] Read-only file system
>
> Could you help me on this?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Graham Perrin | 11 Nov 23:21
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: Best practice to install products for Plone 3.1.x


buildout is preferred :)
--

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Best-practice-to-install-products-for-Plone-3.1.x-tp1487050p1487231.html
Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Permalink | Reply | 8 comments |
headers
erik kulvinskas | 12 Nov 00:12
Picon

Re: Best practice to install products for Plone 3.1.x


Graham Perrin wrote:
> 
> buildout is preferred :)
> 

excellent... now is buildout supported on the windows platform? i have no
problem using it on OS X but am having a problem finding the buildout
scripts on windows.

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Best-practice-to-install-products-for-Plone-3.1.x-tp1487050p1487404.html
Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Permalink | Reply | 7 comments |
headers
Graham Perrin | 12 Nov 02:39
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Windows installation - buildout scripts


erik kulvinskas wrote:
> excellent... now is buildout supported on the windows platform? i have no
> problem using it on OS X but am having a problem finding the buildout
> scripts on windows.

<http://plone.org/products/plone/releases/3.1.6> shows that for the current
version 3.1.6 of Plone, the buildout-based installer for Windows is
'experimental'. 

<https://launchpad.net/plone/+download> for a lazy overview of the points at
which buildout-based installers are, or have been, experimental.

I'm sometimes lost in Tracs but I suspect that (a) the script you seek is
here: 
<http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/Installers/Windows/trunk/3.1/buildout.cfg> 

More importantly (b) I expect that the script will be installed in its
proper place if you use the experimental installer :)

As quality of buildout-based installers is a priority, I have no doubt that
any related report to Trac will be recognised swiftly. 

Regards
Graham
--

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Best-practice-to-install-products-for-Plone-3.1.x-tp1487050p1487895.html
Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Steve McMahon | 12 Nov 06:23
Gravatar

Re: Best practice to install products for Plone 3.1.x

The new version of the windows installer (the "experimental") includes buildout.

If you're using an earlier installer, see:

http://plone.org/documentation/how-to/buildout-using-windows-installer/view?searchterm=windows%20buildout

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 3:12 PM, erik kulvinskas <vaporboy@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Graham Perrin wrote:
>>
>> buildout is preferred :)
>>
>
> excellent... now is buildout supported on the windows platform? i have no
> problem using it on OS X but am having a problem finding the buildout
> scripts on windows.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Best-practice-to-install-products-for-Plone-3.1.x-tp1487050p1487404.html
> Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Setup mailing list
> Setup@...
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Alan Runyan | 12 Nov 20:43

Re: Best practice to install products for Plone 3.1.x

Use the "experimental" buildout installer and PROVIDE FEEDBACK.
It is going to drop the "experimental" soon.  NEED FEEDBACK.  We use it fine.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:12 PM, erik kulvinskas <vaporboy@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Graham Perrin wrote:
>>
>> buildout is preferred :)
>>
>
> excellent... now is buildout supported on the windows platform? i have no
> problem using it on OS X but am having a problem finding the buildout
> scripts on windows.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Best-practice-to-install-products-for-Plone-3.1.x-tp1487050p1487404.html
> Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Setup mailing list
> Setup@...
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup
>

--

-- 
Alan Runyan
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Alan Runyan | 12 Nov 20:47

Re: Best practice to install products for Plone 3.1.x

Steve,

Let's no longer show anyone anything OTHER than the Windows installer buildout.
If that does not work - we need to figure out why.  We need to *STOP* having
multiple paths to the goal.  With regards to Windows *we must* tell people to
use the official Windows installers.

We already have too many ways to solve one problem in the software.  We need
One True Way to configuration and install the software.

cheers
alan

p.s. if it sounds like I'm being bitchy it is because I am.  We must discourage
people from anything other than the "official blessed installers".

p.p.s. you rock ;)

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Steve McMahon <steve@...> wrote:
> The new version of the windows installer (the "experimental") includes buildout.
>
> If you're using an earlier installer, see:
>
> http://plone.org/documentation/how-to/buildout-using-windows-installer/view?searchterm=windows%20buildout
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 3:12 PM, erik kulvinskas <vaporboy@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Graham Perrin wrote:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Alan Runyan | 12 Nov 20:49

Re: Windows installation - buildout scripts

> More importantly (b) I expect that the script will be installed in its
> proper place if you use the experimental installer :)

Yes.

> As quality of buildout-based installers is a priority, I have no doubt that
> any related report to Trac will be recognised swiftly.

Graham , you would be surprised.  Very few people are reporting issues.
Because there are million ways to skin the cat and people are
wary of something called "experimental".  They think its a time-suck
and they would rather go down the "non-experimental tried-and-true
way".  Which is net loss for the individual and the community.

USE THE INSTALLER.  REPORT BUGS.

Thank you 8-)
alan runyan
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane