Alvaro Lopez Ortega | 1 Mar 21:00 2008
Picon

Re: issues with redirect/rewrite rules with cherokee V0.6

On 29 Feb 2008, at 21:20, Shane Volpe wrote:

> ok I'm just using only secure now but I still what to know why the  
> following does not work:
> vserver!default!directory!/ !handler = redir
> vserver!default!directory!/!handler!rewrite!1!show = 0
> vserver!default!directory!/!handler!rewrite!1!regex = http://(.*)/?
> vserver!default!directory!/!handler!rewrite!1!substring = https://$1

Well, it does not support that kind of redirections because the change  
of protocol is meant to be done by "only secure". The redir handler  
can redirect any URL to a new one using the same protocol.

> I get the following error:
> ERROR: Handler file: Unknown key: 'rewrite'

Something is wrong, there is no "rewrite" in the snipped configuration  
that you have pasted. :-)

--
Greetings, alo.
http://www.alobbs.com/
Claudio J. Chiabai | 3 Mar 15:28 2008

Compile cheroke 0.5.6 en solaris 10

Sorry my english :-)

I try compile cherokee in solaris 10.

server.c: In function 'update_bogo_now':
server.c:1125: error: 'struct tm' has no member named 'tm_gmtoff'
server.c:1126: error: 'struct tm' has no member named 'tm_gmtoff'

Version 0.6.x check gmtoff (changeLog reading)
Is correct? How could compile en solaris 10? Patch code with the "check 
gmtoff" of version 0.6.x?

--

-- 
Saludos ... Claudio
============================
Zarcrom Industries Corporation
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, DE 19958
http://www.zarcrom.com.ar/
Alvaro Lopez Ortega | 4 Mar 17:10 2008
Picon

Cherokee 0.6.0 on Solaris 10: MySQL bug

Hi guys,

I just want to let you know that we are going to hit a bug in the  
upcoming Cherokee 0.6.0 release.

If you compile Cherokee 0.6.0 on Solaris 10 with MySQL support I will  
fail due to a known MySQL bug: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=22430 .

The workaround is to configure it with the parameter "--with-mysql=no".

--
Greetings, alo.
Alvaro Lopez Ortega | 4 Mar 19:37 2008
Picon

Re: Compile cheroke 0.5.6 en solaris 10

On 3 Mar 2008, at 15:28, Claudio J. Chiabai wrote:

> server.c: In function 'update_bogo_now':
> server.c:1125: error: 'struct tm' has no member named 'tm_gmtoff'
> server.c:1126: error: 'struct tm' has no member named 'tm_gmtoff'
>
> Version 0.6.x check gmtoff (changeLog reading)

Which compiler are you using? It has compiled for me on Solaris 10 and  
Nevada (nv83).

--
Greetings, alo.
Taher Shihadeh | 5 Mar 22:47 2008

Re: Is Cherokee 0.6.0 ready?

Yep.
CherokeeManagement.py::is_PID_alive( ) still doesn't work for me.
But I'm sure it will, eventually. ;)

05 Mar 2008, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> For those of you who have tested trunk these days:
> 
> Can you guys think of something missing or buggy that should stop me  
> from releasing Cherokee 0.6.0 tomorrow or the day after? My 'TODO list  
> toward 0.6' has finally run out of items!
> 
> --
> Greetings, alo.
> http://www.alobbs.com/

--

-- 
taher <at> unixwars.com
http://unixwars.com
Stefan de Konink | 5 Mar 23:09 2008
Picon
Picon

Re: Is Cherokee 0.6.0 ready?

On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> For those of you who have tested trunk these days:
>
> Can you guys think of something missing or buggy that should stop me
> from releasing Cherokee 0.6.0 tomorrow or the day after? My 'TODO list
> toward 0.6' has finally run out of items!

Does authentication in userdir already work?

Stefan
Alvaro Lopez Ortega | 6 Mar 14:19 2008
Picon

Re: Is Cherokee 0.6.0 ready?

On 5 Mar 2008, at 23:09, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> For those of you who have tested trunk these days:
>>
>> Can you guys think of something missing or buggy that should stop me
>> from releasing Cherokee 0.6.0 tomorrow or the day after? My 'TODO  
>> list
>> toward 0.6' has finally run out of items!
>
> Does authentication in userdir already work?

It should, actually. Otherwise it would be a bug.

--
Greetings, alo.
http://www.alobbs.com/
Claudio J. Chiabai | 6 Mar 14:38 2008

Re: Is Cherokee 0.6.0 ready?

-lpthread ../cherokee/.libs/libcherokee-client.so -ldl  -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/opt/cherokee/lib
main.o: In function `main':
/home/claudio/cherokee-0.6.0b1202/cget/main.c:410: undefined reference to 
`cherokee_trace_init'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

claudio <at> localhost:~/cherokee-0.6.0b1202$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Esto es software libre; vea el código para las condiciones de copia.  NO hay
garantía; ni siquiera para MERCANTIBILIDAD o IDONEIDAD PARA UN PROPÓSITO EN
PARTICULAR

claudio <at> localhost:~/cherokee-0.6.0b1202$ uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 23:05:12 GMT 2007 i686 
GNU/Linux

SO -> Ubuntu 7.10

El Wednesday 05 March 2008 19:34:17 Alvaro Lopez Ortega escribió:
> Hi guys,
>
> For those of you who have tested trunk these days:
>
> Can you guys think of something missing or buggy that should stop me
> from releasing Cherokee 0.6.0 tomorrow or the day after? My 'TODO list
> toward 0.6' has finally run out of items!
>
> --
> Greetings, alo.
(Continue reading)

Alvaro Lopez Ortega | 6 Mar 15:13 2008
Picon

Re: Is Cherokee 0.6.0 ready?

On 6 Mar 2008, at 14:24, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> Alvaro Lopez Ortega schreef:
>> On 5 Mar 2008, at 23:09, Stefan de Konink wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> For those of you who have tested trunk these days:
>>>>
>>>> Can you guys think of something missing or buggy that should stop  
>>>> me
>>>> from releasing Cherokee 0.6.0 tomorrow or the day after? My 'TODO  
>>>> list
>>>> toward 0.6' has finally run out of items!
>>>
>>> Does authentication in userdir already work?
>> It should, actually. Otherwise it would be a bug.
>
> Just to be sure, so it is possible now to make *one* config like / 
> home/*/.htpasswd and have all users to have their own password?

It is possible to configure public_html user behavior from the  
configuration file. However, with 0.6 there is no way to use a local  
user file for the authentication.

It makes sense to support it, but we are not going to make it for 0.6.0.

Could you please log a RFE for this?
  http://code.google.com/p/cherokee/issues/entry

(Continue reading)

Stefan de Konink | 6 Mar 15:27 2008
Picon
Picon

Re: Is Cherokee 0.6.0 ready?

Alvaro Lopez Ortega schreef:
> On 6 Mar 2008, at 14:24, Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> Alvaro Lopez Ortega schreef:
>>> On 5 Mar 2008, at 23:09, Stefan de Konink wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> For those of you who have tested trunk these days:
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you guys think of something missing or buggy that should stop me
>>>>> from releasing Cherokee 0.6.0 tomorrow or the day after? My 'TODO list
>>>>> toward 0.6' has finally run out of items!
>>>>
>>>> Does authentication in userdir already work?
>>> It should, actually. Otherwise it would be a bug.
>>
>> Just to be sure, so it is possible now to make *one* config like 
>> /home/*/.htpasswd and have all users to have their own password?
> 
> It is possible to configure public_html user behavior from the 
> configuration file. However, with 0.6 there is no way to use a local 
> user file for the authentication.
> 
> It makes sense to support it, but we are not going to make it for 0.6.0.
> 
> Could you please log a RFE for this?
>  http://code.google.com/p/cherokee/issues/entry

http://code.google.com/p/cherokee/issues/detail?id=21
(Continue reading)


Gmane