Possible bug on memcached 1.6

Guys
I think I found a bug on branch engine-pu. Where should ir report it?

Memcached stats collection

Hi,

How can I collect the stats for memcache, when memcache is running on
unix socket?

Thanks and Regards,
Suraj

Failed to write, and not due to blocking: Broken pipe

Seeing a lot of these:

Failed to write, and not due to blocking: Broken pipe

Any clues?

decr on Int64.MaxValue fails with "CLIENT_ERROR cannot increment or decrement non-numeric value"

Here's the repro on the largest unsigned 64-bit integer
18446744073709551615 with telnet on memcached 1.4.5

>set aad2ac07-2fd5-42bb-88b9-e7bae3b55f5b 0 200 20
18446744073709551615
STORED
>get aad2ac07-2fd5-42bb-88b9-e7bae3b55f5b
VALUE aad2ac07-2fd5-42bb-88b9-e7bae3b55f5b 0 20
18446744073709551615
END
>decr aad2ac07-2fd5-42bb-88b9-e7bae3b55f5b 100
CLIENT_ERROR cannot increment or decrement non-numeric value

Is this a known bug?

memcached failing

hi

we are using memcached 1.4.5_2 on 3 servers, each server has the same
version of all software installed. on two servers memcached is working
perfectly, however on the 3rd if doesnt work, it appears to not return
any data, the sql connection is working fine and the code we are using
is OK as it is shared via NFS to all 3 servers, here is a sample of
when we try to use memcache:

host# /usr/local/bin/memcached -vv -d -u nobody
host# slab class   1: chunk size        80 perslab   13107
slab class   2: chunk size       104 perslab   10082
slab class   3: chunk size       136 perslab    7710
slab class   4: chunk size       176 perslab    5957
slab class   5: chunk size       224 perslab    4681
slab class   6: chunk size       280 perslab    3744
slab class   7: chunk size       352 perslab    2978
slab class   8: chunk size       440 perslab    2383
slab class   9: chunk size       552 perslab    1899
slab class  10: chunk size       696 perslab    1506
slab class  11: chunk size       872 perslab    1202
slab class  12: chunk size      1096 perslab     956
slab class  13: chunk size      1376 perslab     762
slab class  14: chunk size      1720 perslab     609
slab class  15: chunk size      2152 perslab     487
slab class  16: chunk size      2696 perslab     388
slab class  17: chunk size      3376 perslab     310
slab class  18: chunk size      4224 perslab     248
slab class  19: chunk size      5280 perslab     198
slab class  20: chunk size      6600 perslab     158

Warning from spymemcached

[PATCH] Support -V (version option)

This is a standard; was surprised memcached didn't support it already.
It is much quieter than looking for the current version in help output.

Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dpmcgee <at> gmail.com>
---

All the recent 1.4.XX releases left me wondering what version I had
installed...and then I realized -V wasn't supported. So this is a patch for
1.4, but it isn't exactly a complex addition either.

 memcached.c |    6 +++++-
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/memcached.c b/memcached.c
index b121e16..b28ab8b 100644
--- a/memcached.c
+++ b/memcached.c
@@ -4477,6 +4477,7 @@ static void usage(void) {
            "-vvv          extremely verbose (also print internal state transitions)\n"
            "-h            print this help and exit\n"
            "-i            print memcached and libevent license\n"
+           "-V            print version and exit\n"
            "-P <file>     save PID in <file>, only used with -d option\n"
            "-f <factor>   chunk size growth factor (default: 1.25)\n"
            "-n <bytes>    minimum space allocated for key+value+flags (default: 48)\n");
@@ -4763,7 +4764,7 @@ int main (int argc, char **argv) {
           "M"   /* return error on memory exhausted */
           "c:"  /* max simultaneous connections */
           "k"   /* lock down all paged memory */
-          "hi"  /* help, licence info */
+          "hiV" /* help, licence info, version */
           "r"   /* maximize core file limit */
           "v"   /* verbose */
           "d"   /* daemon mode */
@@ -4815,6 +4816,9 @@ int main (int argc, char **argv) {
         case 'i':
             usage_license();
             exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
+		case 'V':
+			printf(PACKAGE " " VERSION "\n");
+            exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
         case 'k':
             lock_memory = true;
             break;
--

-- 
1.7.9

Memcached for Social Network Site (Correct Me)

Seeking approval to use Memcached Logo on a poster with other logos

Hey dormando,
I'm a developer at Chatham Financial, and we're big fans of memcached.

I was wondering if my company can use the logo for a poster at
recruiting events.

The idea is that we want to showcase at a glance some of the software/
programs that we work with every day - hence displaying the logos
instead just listing the of names. Memcached would be one of
(hopefully) 22 other libraries/programs that we'd show the logo for.

We will specifically note we have no involvement in the creation of
any of the software or logos that we're using, and that using the
logos is either okay by a license or written agreement.

I'm posting from my personal gmail account, but if you need me to
email from my company email account, then let me know (it's not hooked
up to Google Groups).

Thanks!
George

P.S. I figured this is the right place for this because a similar
request is here:
http://groups.google.com/group/memcached/browse_thread/thread/dec84296b504f38a/5fba25e16f0d4e2b?lnk=gst&q=logo#5fba25e16f0d4e2b

1.4.13 is up

I am a moron; enjoy 1.4.13. only two tiny changes which should've been in
.12.

-Dormando

Best Architecture For DNS Round Robin + Memcached

Dear all,

I have a plan to start a new project with this scenario :

1 server for database
1 server for web
1 server for memcache

In the future, if the traffic increase, I will add more servers as web
server and also memcache. But many developers suggest me to use this
scenario :

1 server for database
1 server for web + memcache
1 server for web + memcache

Of course with this second scenario, everytime I buy a new server will
be configured as web + memcache server.

I don't mind at all, but the question is...

If i'm using DNS round robin as load balancing method, then user A is
handled by server 1, his PHP session also stored on that server 1, but
on the second request he is handled by server 2, he won't get his
session back, right?

How to make this memcache server can 'comunicate' each other? So that
user's session won't be broken.

Thanks.