headers
Olivier Sessink | 1 Dec 2010 10:50
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Wordpress language and plugin proposal

On 11/30/2010 09:23 AM, David Binovec wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Well, I use, on my local instalation, a modified PHP bfinc file where I
> do include wordpress language (as I work almost all the time with
> wordpress and that inclusion manages autorecognision of wordpress
> language when php is in use). But it is not necessary.
>
> Anyway, how to insert bfinc into bflang?

it's an XML feature that we use:

in the top of the php.bflang2 file, all-php is defined as the contents 
of file all-php.bfinc
<!ENTITY all-php SYSTEM "all-php.bfinc">

so, if you insert &all-php; in php.bflang2, it will insert the complete 
contents of all-php.bfinc in that position.

 > Is there any documentation for
> bflang and bfinc files?

sample.bflang2 has the best documentation I think.

Olivier

--

-- 
Bluefish website http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/
Blog http://oli4444.wordpress.com/
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Olivier Sessink | 2 Dec 2010 12:28
Picon
Gravatar

merge gtk3 tree back to trunk?

Hi all,

I just merged all changes from trunk to the gtk3 branch and made it
compile again. Shouldn't we merge all those changes back to trunk?

Olivier
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Olivier Sessink | 2 Dec 2010 16:16
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Wordpress bfinc and bflang

On 12/01/2010 02:03 PM, David Binovec wrote:
[..]
> I'm sending you this file (as well as bflang file) for case you would
> like to include it to bluefish.

are wordpress files just php files, (*.php) or do they have some 
extension and mime type of their own?

i.o.w. should we include the wordpress functions optional in the php 
language file, or make it a separate language file?

Olivier

--

-- 
Bluefish website http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/
Blog http://oli4444.wordpress.com/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jim Hayward | 3 Dec 2010 15:01

Re: merge gtk3 tree back to trunk?

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:28 +0100, Olivier Sessink wrote:

> I just merged all changes from trunk to the gtk3 branch and made it
> compile again. Shouldn't we merge all those changes back to trunk?

As long as it builds on all current platform targets, I see no reason
not to merge the gtk3 branch back to trunk.

What are your current plans for a 2.0.3 release?

Regards,
	Jim H
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Olivier Sessink | 3 Dec 2010 16:03
Picon
Gravatar

Re: merge gtk3 tree back to trunk?

> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:28 +0100, Olivier Sessink wrote:
>
>> I just merged all changes from trunk to the gtk3 branch and made it
>> compile again. Shouldn't we merge all those changes back to trunk?
>
> As long as it builds on all current platform targets, I see no reason
> not to merge the gtk3 branch back to trunk.

as far as I have tested it builds on all platforms that trunk compiles on.
I have not tested win32!!!

> What are your current plans for a 2.0.3 release?

no plans yet. We could do a release before the merge, we could do the
release after the merge. Any preference?

Olivier

--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe bluefish-dev" in
the body of a message to listar@... or visit the list control
panel at http://www.ems.ru/cgi-bin/listargate.cgi
Bluefish web site: http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Bradley D. Thornton | 3 Dec 2010 19:30
Picon

Re: merge gtk3 tree back to trunk?


my prefs would be following the merge ;)

On 12/03/2010 07:03 AM, Olivier Sessink wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:28 +0100, Olivier Sessink wrote:
>>
>>> I just merged all changes from trunk to the gtk3 branch and made it
>>> compile again. Shouldn't we merge all those changes back to trunk?
>>
>> As long as it builds on all current platform targets, I see no reason
>> not to merge the gtk3 branch back to trunk.
> 
> as far as I have tested it builds on all platforms that trunk compiles on.
> I have not tested win32!!!
> 
>> What are your current plans for a 2.0.3 release?
> 
> no plans yet. We could do a release before the merge, we could do the
> release after the merge. Any preference?
> 
> Olivier
> 
> 

--

-- 
Bradley D. Thornton
Manager Network Services
NorthTech Computer
TEL: +1.760.666.2703  (US)
TEL: +44.702.405.1909 (UK)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jim Hayward | 4 Dec 2010 21:07

Re: merge gtk3 tree back to trunk?

On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 16:03 +0100, Olivier Sessink wrote:

> as far as I have tested it builds on all platforms that trunk compiles on.
> I have not tested win32!!!

It cross compiles for win32 under F14. There really should not be any
issues. So far the only changes have been just minor API changes. We
have yet to make any major API changes that require a lot of code to be
rewritten.

> > What are your current plans for a 2.0.3 release?
> 
> no plans yet. We could do a release before the merge, we could do the
> release after the merge. Any preference?

With the current changes in the gtk3 branch, I think we could do either
one.

Regards,
	Jim H
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jim Hayward | 4 Dec 2010 21:15

Items that should be fixed for 2.0.3

Hi All,

Anyone have any items they think should be fixed before the 2.0.3
release? 

Regards,
	Jim H
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
clansco | 5 Dec 2010 12:00
Favicon

preferences.c gettext issues

Hi Jim,
items are not traduced in preferences for : 

preferences.c:1863 Show _pop-up window (items in preferences.c:1803)

preferences.c:1873 Show _whitespace: (items in preferences.c:1811)

regards,
ff
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Olivier Sessink | 5 Dec 2010 15:45
Picon
Gravatar

Re: preferences.c gettext issues

On 12/05/2010 12:00 PM, clansco wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> items are not traduced in preferences for : 
> 
> preferences.c:1863 Show _pop-up window (items in preferences.c:1803)
> 
> preferences.c:1873 Show _whitespace: (items in preferences.c:1811)

weird, they are marked for translation? (the _() around the string marks
the string for translation)

Olivier
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane