1 Feb 2009 16:29
CELT low-latency codec
Greetings all!
As if you guys didn't have enough to work on already, I wanted to know if any consideration has been put into supporting the new up-and-coming high-quality really-low-latency CELT codec:
http://www.celt-codec.org/
I chatted a bit with the developers of the telepathy real-time communication framework, and they're interested in it, and the FreeSWITCH project already supports it (even though the codec itself is, I believe, still experimental). Reviews are raving across the board, it seems.
I just don't want QuteCom to be behind the curve on this one. Plus, support for CELT would really be a plus as it is just about the best performing general-audio codec out there so far.
As if you guys didn't have enough to work on already, I wanted to know if any consideration has been put into supporting the new up-and-coming high-quality really-low-latency CELT codec:
http://www.celt-codec.org/
I chatted a bit with the developers of the telepathy real-time communication framework, and they're interested in it, and the FreeSWITCH project already supports it (even though the codec itself is, I believe, still experimental). Reviews are raving across the board, it seems.
I just don't want QuteCom to be behind the curve on this one. Plus, support for CELT would really be a plus as it is just about the best performing general-audio codec out there so far.
|
Basil Mohamed Gohar abu_hurayrah <at> hidayahonline.org www.basilgohar.com |
_______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list QuteCom-dev@... http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
RSS Feed