Abebe Amare | 1 Feb 09:00
Picon

Re: MGCP PRI gateway sending cell phone # on forwarded call when redirecting number turned off

Hi Erik,
I have the same problem as you described. The solution involves making the below changes under the gateway (in my case H.323 gateway) and asking the telco to let only numbers in my DID range to appear as calling party (they call it number validation or something like that).



hope this helps,

Abebe

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Erick B. <erickbee <at> gmail.com> wrote:
Anyone know of what else could cause a forwarded call back out a PRI
(MGCP gateway) send the outside callers number as Calling Party # even
when redirecting number inbound/outbound is not enabled and I made
sure the endpoint unregistered/etc and was reset. Even physically
reloaded the gateway.  Tried to make a route pattern for the number
were forwarding to and setting the calling party # to a specific
number and still the call goes out PRI with the outside persons number
on forwarded call.

Thanks, Erick
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Abebe Amare | 1 Feb 09:06
Picon

Re: MGCP PRI gateway sending cell phone # on forwarded call when redirecting number turned off

Sorry I forgot to include the attachment

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Abebe Amare <abucho <at> gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Erik,
I have the same problem as you described. The solution involves making the below changes under the gateway (in my case H.323 gateway) and asking the telco to let only numbers in my DID range to appear as calling party (they call it number validation or something like that).



hope this helps,

Abebe


On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Erick B. <erickbee <at> gmail.com> wrote:
Anyone know of what else could cause a forwarded call back out a PRI
(MGCP gateway) send the outside callers number as Calling Party # even
when redirecting number inbound/outbound is not enabled and I made
sure the endpoint unregistered/etc and was reset. Even physically
reloaded the gateway.  Tried to make a route pattern for the number
were forwarding to and setting the calling party # to a specific
number and still the call goes out PRI with the outside persons number
on forwarded call.

Thanks, Erick
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Anthony Kouloglou | 1 Feb 13:21
Picon
Favicon

CUCME : Same Dead End . Any workarounds?

Hi all,
i am facing the problem where all incoming calls in a CUCME are ringing at the same time two devices but at some point, the company wants to have a call-forward all function enabled by one ( or both devices).

1. When i use parallel voice hunt group, call forward-all on any device does nothing (known issue)
2. When i use a third dn, overlay it to both devices in order to ring at the same time, call-forward all works only on the first dn
3. When i use the same secondary number on both dns, they have the same preference so they ring randomly.

Has anyone solved this puzzle?

Best Regards
Anthony

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Wes Sisk | 1 Feb 14:00
Picon
Favicon

Re: CUCME : Same Dead End . Any workarounds?

maybe configure phone1 with mobility and configured phone2's DN as a remote destination?

This will create 2 separate call legs that CUCM will independently manage.

/wes

On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:

Hi all,
i am facing the problem where all incoming calls in a CUCME are ringing at the same time two devices but at some point, the company wants to have a call-forward all function enabled by one ( or both devices).

1. When i use parallel voice hunt group, call forward-all on any device does nothing (known issue)
2. When i use a third dn, overlay it to both devices in order to ring at the same time, call-forward all works only on the first dn
3. When i use the same secondary number on both dns, they have the same preference so they ring randomly.

Has anyone solved this puzzle?

Best Regards
Anthony

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Anthony Kouloglou | 1 Feb 14:19
Picon
Favicon

Re: CUCME : Same Dead End . Any workarounds?

Thanks for the tip Wes but that seems kind of complicated for average user.
Besides, i simplified my scenario but there are actually 4 devices answering calls.
And also, do all devices support this feature? (ie SPA508)

Cheers
Anthony

On 01-Feb-12 15:00, Wes Sisk wrote:
maybe configure phone1 with mobility and configured phone2's DN as a remote destination?

This will create 2 separate call legs that CUCM will independently manage.

/wes

On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:

Hi all,
i am facing the problem where all incoming calls in a CUCME are ringing at the same time two devices but at some point, the company wants to have a call-forward all function enabled by one ( or both devices).

1. When i use parallel voice hunt group, call forward-all on any device does nothing (known issue)
2. When i use a third dn, overlay it to both devices in order to ring at the same time, call-forward all works only on the first dn
3. When i use the same secondary number on both dns, they have the same preference so they ring randomly.

Has anyone solved this puzzle?

Best Regards
Anthony

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
David Zhars | 1 Feb 14:30
Picon

Change Email Settings

Unity and UCM would email me if an error occurred (backups missed, or some critical service died, or whatnot).
We changed email servers, so I need to login to those bad boys and give them the new server info...
I just can't seem to find where this is done.

Appreciate any help.

Dave

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Jason Burns | 1 Feb 15:15
Picon
Gravatar

Re: SCCP 7965 Directories > Missed Calls/Placed Calls blank if no TFTP server

Jason,

This started with CUCM 7.X and Internal Services Provisioning. There is a special internal service that the phones use that they get from the TFTP config file. This service is a shortcut that says "Use the service from the server you're registered to" for things like corporate directory.

Check out the attached image so you can see the shortcut service.

You can switch the Phone Services Provisioning back to the old way of "External". This is configurable on the phone, or as an enterprise/service parameter (I don't remember which). The new way is better for load balancing though (for services that do reach out to servers) so I'd recommend sticking with it and just fixing the TFTP access.

For something like missed calls the phone wouldn't need to visit a CUCM server, but since the phone uses the new Internal Services Provisioning it's going to rely on what's configured in the TFTP file before it shows that Directory. There is probably room for improvement here though. The phone should fail back to  something else if available in flash when TFTP fails.

Does that explain it well enough?

-Jason Burns

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <jason.aarons <at> dimensiondata.com> wrote:

We noticed that if a SCCP 7965 phone doesn’t have a TFTP Server 1 entry when you http://phoneip > Network Configuration (it’s Registered to CCM via cached tftp entry I guess as it can place/make calls) that the Directories Place/Received/Missed call logs are empty. Problem can also occur with cdp missing on switchport, etc.  On a side note it would be cool if phone doesn’t get a tftp server that the on-screen display indicate that for troubleshooting purposes versus Status Messages.

 

The real question is “Why does the Directories button use tftp?”  Trying to figure out under the covers what those Missed/Place/Received entries are doing with tftp?


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Jason Burns | 1 Feb 15:18
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Change Email Settings

Use the Real Time Monitoring Tool to connect into these servers and set your notification destinations / email servers. System > Tools > Alert > Config Email Server.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:30 AM, David Zhars <dzhars <at> gmail.com> wrote:
Unity and UCM would email me if an error occurred (backups missed, or some critical service died, or whatnot).
We changed email servers, so I need to login to those bad boys and give them the new server info...
I just can't seem to find where this is done.

Appreciate any help.

Dave

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Lazaro Pereira | 1 Feb 15:01
Favicon

Re: Change Email Settings

HI Dave,

 

I believe you should be able to change the SMTP server for the CUCM server in the Cisco Unified OS Admin page under : Settings => SMTP

 

As for Unity I have not done alerting from it but this might help:  http://www.ciscounitytools.com/Applications/CxN/EMS/Help/CreatingARecipient.html

 

Lazaro

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces <at> puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces <at> puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Zhars
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 8:31 AM
To: cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Change Email Settings

 

Unity and UCM would email me if an error occurred (backups missed, or some critical service died, or whatnot).
We changed email servers, so I need to login to those bad boys and give them the new server info...
I just can't seem to find where this is done.

Appreciate any help.

Dave

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Ryan Ratliff | 1 Feb 16:03
Picon
Favicon

Re: Increase Report Data

If CAR isn't meeting your needs then use the CDR export to an external server and run whatever reports you wish on however much data you require.
I'm sure there are quite a few folks on this list that can recommend 3rd party CDR analysis apps.

-Ryan

On Jan 31, 2012, at 9:03 AM, David Zhars wrote:

when I run reports, it usually only says I can get data for about one month.
with all these huge hard drives, and even external logging machines, why can't I save data for a year?
Is there a setting somewhere in CM 8.0 that would let me keep data for a longer period?  Can I keep data for diff lengths based on gateways or extensions?
We only have about 300 phones, so it's nothing excessive....

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip <at> puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Gmane