2 Jun 2008 17:39
Re: [PATCH] x264 executable stack and selinux
Loren Merritt <lorenm <at> u.washington.edu>
2008-06-02 15:39:57 GMT
2008-06-02 15:39:57 GMT
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Guillaume POIRIER wrote: > > However, I'm tempted to reject that patch since for some time already, > only YASM support has been supported, so having binaries built with > NASM that cause some trouble is to be expected. > > Maybe a cleared statement or a configure test should be added to > require YASM, but I doubt that it will please people, since IIRC, > simple cases such as static lib on Linux and Windows x86 (that is, a > large majority of x264's userbase) should work, thought it's mainly by > luck. > > I'd prefer if Loren could take a decision about the problem of NASM's support. nasm works for me. --Loren Merritt _______________________________________________ x264-devel mailing list x264-devel <at> videolan.org http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
RSS Feed