RE: Assign-to: field
Cheers,
:D
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Daragh
Fitzpatrick
Daragh-3aI4IeFKCVr2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org (773)
702-8976
Solutions
Architect
NSIT Administrative Systems
Renewal Projects and
Architecture
University of
Chicago
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 3:39 PM
To: trac-/d+y5hMAhVIyk1uROcNW80EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org; Daragh-t4+EzPmVLfD2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Trac] Assign-to: field
Cheers,
:D
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Daragh
Fitzpatrick
Daragh-3aI4IeFKCVr2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org (773)
702-8976
Solutions
Architect
NSIT Administrative Systems
Renewal Projects and
Architecture
University of
Chicago
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 3:05 PM
To: trac-/d+y5hMAhVIyk1uROcNW80EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: [Trac] Tickets Usage Question
Cheers,
:D
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Daragh
Fitzpatrick
Daragh-3aI4IeFKCVr2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org (773)
702-8976
Solutions
Architect
NSIT Administrative Systems
Renewal Projects and
Architecture
University of
Chicago
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:38 PM
To: trac-/d+y5hMAhVIyk1uROcNW80EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: [Trac] Tickets Usage Question
No one responded to my email, so I think that means everyone does not have any problems with the current implementation of the Trac tickets. I can see where the simplified model may be easier to use with small projects, but as projects grow, this seems like it could be insufficient. Subversion uses this state model for their issue tracking: http://subversion.tigris.org/scdocs/issue_lifecycle.html
So my next question would be: How hard would it be to add more states to the ticket status?
Thanks! Kevin
-----Original
Message-----
From:
trac-bounces-/d+y5hMAhVIyk1uROcNW80EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org [mailto:trac-bounces-/d+y5hMAhVIyk1uROcNW80EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org]
On Behalf Of Lee,
Kevin
Sent: Friday, May 14,
2004 11:49 AM
To:
trac-/d+y5hMAhVIyk1uROcNW80EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Trac] Tickets Usage
Question
Hi,
I’m trying to figure out how we can use Trac Tickets for our projects. I’m not sure how to model the state that a bug has been fixed and is ready for verification by QA. A bug is typically not considered resolved until it has been included in a build and verified by QA.
Also, I’m used to having a way to know when a fix for a bug is ready to be built (ie. It has been committed). This is not as important as the ready for QA state.
I’m used to the following use case:
TRAC
1) QA gets a build (labeled BUILD_A) and starts testing
2) QA finds a bug and files a bug against build BUILD_A New Ticket
3) Developer investigates bug
a. Not a problem – user error Resolved - invalid
b. Works for me Resolved - WorksForMe
c. Finds issue Accepted
4) Developer releases fix for bug ???? – ready to build – assign to the build mgr
5) Bug fix goes into a new build – BUILD_B ???? – ready to verify – assign to the tester
6) QA gets build BUILD_B and retests bug against fix
7) Bug is either
a. Fixed Resolved – fixed
b. Needs more fixing Reopened ?
Is there a way in the current Trac setup to allow this use case? How are other people using Trac?
Also, I see a button for accepting a ticket, but whenever I reassign a ticket to someone, it automatically gets set to accepted. Is there a config somewhere that I need to set to allow the assigned person to accept a ticket?
I’m just a beginner with Trac. Is it easy to modify the configuration of the web pages and/or the database to add this kind of functionality?
Thanks! Kevin Lee
kdlee-zC7DfRvBq/JWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
_______________________________________________ Trac mailing list Trac@... http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac
Is the database schema
documented anywhere?
Thanks for your time...
Felix
/The Trac Team <
RSS Feed