1 May 2007 01:03
Re: MT 'blame' and 'log' Auditing - Design Specification
Daniel Rall <dlr <at> collab.net>
2007-04-30 23:03:10 GMT
2007-04-30 23:03:10 GMT
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mark Phippard wrote: > > I still do not agree with this part of the spec: > > > > svn blame > > Two additional columns for each line, with the original revision > > and author of that line. Unlike other commands, we do not need to > > worry about multiple source revisions, because each line can have at > > most one author. > > > > > > I object to the two additional columns. If I run svn blame > > --merge-sensitive I do not need to see any other information. I > > thought at one point we even said that were it not for the expected > > performance hit in getting the merge information that svn blame should > > just always return this information. When using blame it is not > > likely that someone would want any other information. > > I agree. I was surprised to see that still in the spec. > > The comments made elsethread about returning both sets of data through > the blame API express a valid concern. This should be fairly easy to > accommodate; the command-line client can just filter this output, while > other clients can cache it or hide it pending a checkbox or whatever > else they please.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed