20 Aug 23:01
Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy <at> imag.fr>
2005-08-20 21:01:55 GMT
2005-08-20 21:01:55 GMT
Hi all, Recently, Tom announced hi was stopping the mainainance of GNU Arch[1]. I didn't see an "official announcement", but as I understand it, Canonical decided to move the effort from Bazaar to Bazaar-NG[2]. The wiki[3] now presents baz as "Bazaar 1" and bzr, AKA Bazaar-NG, as "Bazaar 2". This raises a few questions to me: What's the future of tla 1.x? Same for 2.0. Given that the main contributors of GNU Arch--except Tom--are mostly people working now on Bazaar-NG, I _guess_ Bazaar is the way of the future. What's the future of Bazaar (baz)? There was a roadmap here[4] that I suppose is mostly outdated. In particular, I'd like to know if the following plans have a chance to be implemented: 1) The namespace change (making a/c--(Continue reading)b--v optional). If this makes its way into bazaar, I guess this will have an influence on front-ends in particular. Actually, I think this idea should be dropped given the new Bazaar<->Bazaar-NG situation. 2) The cached-inventory system. Since, as I understand it, Robert started working on this, and it could really improve the performance, that may be a good thing to get it in Bazaar. Is there an approximate roadmap for Bazaar 2? Currently, Bazaar-NG is evolving quickly, with no guarantee of backward compatibility, which is good for a prototype, but will off course have to change. I think
RSS Feed