Sven Köhler | 1 Jan 18:34
Picon

Re: semething like rectangle split with more than 4 parts

Sven Köhler schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> according to the documentation, rectangle split only supports up to 4
> parts. (Well, there's no error message if you say rectangle split parts=5)
> 
> I need something with 5, maybe 6 parts. I already tried:
> 
> \node[draw, shape=rectangle, text width=10em, anchor=north west] (a) {bla1};
> \node[draw, shape=rectangle, text width=10em, anchor=north west] (b) at
> (a.south west) {bla2};
> \node[draw, shape=rectangle, text width=10em, anchor=north west] (c) at
> (b.south west) {bla3};
> \node[draw, shape=rectangle, text width=10em, anchor=north west] (d) at
> (c.south west) {bla4};
> \node[draw, shape=rectangle, text width=10em, anchor=north west] (e) at
> (d.south west) {bla5};
> 
> But it really doesn't look nice. The lines where the rectangles touch
> look to thick.
> 
> Any tipps on how to achieve what i'm loocking for?

Well, now i've tried:

\node[shape=rectangle, text width=10em, anchor=north west] (a) {bla1};
\node[shape=rectangle, text width=10em, anchor=north west] (b) at
(a.south west) {bla2};
\node[shape=rectangle, text width=10em, anchor=north west] (c) at
(b.south west) {bla3};
(Continue reading)

Maciej Konieczny | 1 Jan 19:53
Picon

[pgfplot] How to plot 'marks' not connected with lines?


I am a new user to the pgfplot. The reason I gave it a try was to use
OpenType fonts in plots, which is possible using XeTeX. I would be quite
satisfied with the pgfplot if I was able to plot measure points not
connected with lines. My desired figure looks like this
http://narf.pl/pgfplot/figure.pdf and it has been obtained using this code
http://narf.pl/pgfplot/figure.tex (26th line: 'line width = 0.0001'). This
looks how I wanted on the screen but thin lines connecting measure points
can be spotted on the printed version.

How to plot 'marks' not connected with lines?

Maciej Konieczny
--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-pgfplot--How-to-plot-%27marks%27-not-connected-with-lines--tp21243706p21243706.html
Sent from the pgf-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Meine | 1 Jan 20:47
Picon
Favicon

Re: semething like rectangle split with more than 4 parts

On Mittwoch 31 Dezember 2008, Sven Köhler wrote:
> according to the documentation, rectangle split only supports up to 4
> parts. (Well, there's no error message if you say rectangle split parts=5)
>
> I need something with 5, maybe 6 parts. I already tried:

I would have used matrix nodes, I guess.  You should be able to configure the 
node styles in order to get the lines you want.

HTH,
  Hans
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
pgf-users mailing list
pgf-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pgf-users
Sven Köhler | 1 Jan 22:03
Picon

Re: semething like rectangle split with more than 4 parts

Hans Meine schrieb:
> On Mittwoch 31 Dezember 2008, Sven Köhler wrote:
>> according to the documentation, rectangle split only supports up to 4
>> parts. (Well, there's no error message if you say rectangle split parts=5)
>>
>> I need something with 5, maybe 6 parts. I already tried:
> 
> I would have used matrix nodes, I guess.  You should be able to configure the 
> node styles in order to get the lines you want.

I found the example:

\begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw}]
\matrix [draw=red,column sep=1cm]
{
\node {8}; & \node{1}; & \node {6}; \\
\node {3}; & \node{5}; & \node {7}; \\
\node {4}; & \node{9}; & \node {2}; \\
};
\end{tikzpicture}

But the lines between 8 and 3 are much to thick.
I could - again - draw all lines by hand to ensure, that every line is a
thick as it's supposed to be, but ....

Is there anything more elegant?

Thanks,
  Sven

(Continue reading)

Dmitry Dzhus | 2 Jan 13:35
Picon
Gravatar

Re: [pgfplot] How to plot 'marks' not connected with lines?

Maciej Konieczny wrote:
> http://narf.pl/pgfplot/figure.tex (26th line: 'line width = 0.0001').

Just replace it with `draw=none`.
--

-- 
Happy Hacking.

http://sphinx.net.ru
む

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
pgf-users mailing list
pgf-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pgf-users
Picon
Favicon

Re: [pgfplot] How to plot 'marks' not connected with, lines?

Hello Maciej,

insert the style 'only marks' instead of the temporary 'line width =
0.0001' - it should work as expected.

Regards

Christian

--

-- 
Christian Feuersaenger
Institut fuer Numerische Simulation
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universitaet Bonn
Wegelerstrasse 6
D-53115 Bonn
Germany

Tel:  +49 228 733848
URL:  http://wissrech.ins.uni-bonn.de/people/feuersaenger.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gad Abraham | 3 Jan 16:26
Picon
Picon

Right bracket on matrix

Hi,

I'm trying to add a right bracket to a matrix but it doesn't work:

documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{matrix}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\matrix [matrix of math nodes,right delimiter=],left delimiter=[ ]
{
a_8 & a_1 & a_6 \\
a_3 & a_5 & a_7 \\
a_4 & a_9 & a_2 \\
};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}

The error is:
! Package tikz Error: A node must have a (possibly empty) label text.

See the tikz package documentation for explanation.
Type  H <return>  for immediate help.
  ...

l.8 ...ix [matrix of math nodes,right delimiter=],
                                                   left delimiter=[ ]
? X

I've also tried "right delimiter=\]", but I get:
(Continue reading)

Alain Matthes | 3 Jan 16:55
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Right bracket on matrix


Le 3 janv. 09 à 16:26, Gad Abraham a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to add a right bracket to a matrix but it doesn't work:
>

Hi,

\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{matrix}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\matrix [matrix of math nodes,right delimiter=\rbrack,left delimiter= 
\lbrack ]
{
a_8 & a_1 & a_6 \\
a_3 & a_5 & a_7 \\
a_4 & a_9 & a_2 \\
};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}

Best Regards

Alain
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Continue reading)

Gad Abraham | 4 Jan 02:34
Picon
Picon

Re: Right bracket on matrix

Alain Matthes wrote:
> 
> Le 3 janv. 09 à 16:26, Gad Abraham a écrit :
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to add a right bracket to a matrix but it doesn't work:
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> \documentclass{minimal}
> \usepackage{tikz}
> \usetikzlibrary{matrix}
> \begin{document}
> \begin{tikzpicture}
> \matrix [matrix of math nodes,right delimiter=\rbrack,left 
> delimiter=\lbrack ]
> {
> a_8 & a_1 & a_6 \\
> a_3 & a_5 & a_7 \\
> a_4 & a_9 & a_2 \\
> };
> \end{tikzpicture}
> \end{document}
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Alain

(Continue reading)

Hans Meine | 4 Jan 10:38
Picon
Favicon

Calendar utility function: Improvement request

Hi,

I just tried to typeset a calendar.  AFAICS, the calendar libary would be even 
10 times better if \pgfcalendardatetojulian would not only accept a fixed 
offset behind the '+', but a weekday-dependent offset.

For example, I could specify to render a calendar sheet not starting with the 
first of the month, but with a complete line showing some days from the month 
before, if it was possible to say e.g. 2009-01-01<{Monday} (meaning it should 
go back to the previous monday.

The same feature could be used to specify holidays, e.g. 2009-24-12<{Sunday} 
to mean the fourth advent Sunday (in Germany, if that matters).

Also, a repeating appointment that happens on every second tuesday of each 
month could be specified e.g. using 2009-04-01>2{Tuesday}.

The syntax would be open for discussion, I just noticed that the above would 
be quite readable, but maybe you find something better.

Have a nice day,
  Hans
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
pgf-users mailing list
pgf-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
(Continue reading)


Gmane