1 Feb 01:08
Re: Compatibility of Lion and Snow Leopard file structures ?
Am Feb 1, 2012 um 12:36 AM schrieb Chris Lott: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@...> wrote: >>> In order for Dropbox to make your files available through the web interface the encryption key *must* be stored by dropbox. >> >> Well, yeah, sure; I suppose it brings come comfort about the Dropbox folks >> to know that they store your keys out of inescapable architectural necessity, >> but it doesn't really add to the point. > > What does add to the point, from my perspective, is that I've lost > and/or had inaccessible data on three different occasions with > SugarSync, which is 100% of the time that I've tried using their > service on more than two computers. Dropbox has just been "set it and > forget it" across a half-dozen or more computers + portable devices. > Less secure? Sure, but it's mostly theoretical and a negligible risk > I'm willing to take--just as I drive to work every day despite the > inherent risks of that activity--for the convenience, performance, and > stability. > > Security is always a spectrum. For most, the issue with deduplication > as implemented by Dropbox isn't particularly relevant and is part of > the price one pays for the convenience and "it just works" nature of > the system. If one is a member of the exceedingly small set where > that really is a problem, then they clearly would want an alternate > system. Of course, most of those folks don't need our advice on the > matter either. > > I appreciate that there is a security issue to consider with Dropbox, > but it feels like FUD when people say that Dropbox is insecure and > leave it at that or make the argument that another system is more(Continue reading)
Gary
RSS Feed