1 Dec 2005 04:48
RE: exchange vs lotus q
<william <at> techsanctuary.org>
2005-12-01 03:48:30 GMT
2005-12-01 03:48:30 GMT
But if you truly want a neutral, balanced analysis, Ed Brill is not the source. Just like you wouldn't bank on Microsoft for the same assessment. Microsoft does have a decent email client that works well with Exchange 200x. http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/entourage2004/entourage2004.aspx Otherwise, maybe the decision on platform has to come first? Clearly if the people who support it are more proficient at Linux, then Domino or another Linux-based application is in order. And I totally second John's suggestion regarding SuSE OpenExchange if Domino is more than what is necessary. W -----Original Message----- From: lnotes-l <at> ozzie.notesnic.net [mailto:lnotes-l <at> ozzie.notesnic.net] On Behalf Of Esther_Strom <at> hmco.com Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 7:51 AM To: Multiple recipients of list LNOTES-L Subject: Re: exchange vs lotus q Michael, Domino does have a Mac client; for the most part it's equal to the Windows version. The main difference is that Java has not been implemented (because the client can be run in Classic mode on a Mac, which does not handle Java well.) So unless you need to do heavy IM integration there shouldn't be too many problems. My company is 70% Mac and we manage just fine...(Continue reading)
RSS Feed