Josef Karliak | 6 Dec 11:37
Picon

Zebedee and two differend tunnels.

   Hi there,
   I'm tunneling telnet thru zebedee tunnel, I need now another  
tunelling for MSSQL (that uses udp) and target is different too. I  
made some configs (port, target, ...) changes into a different config  
files (client and server of course), in init startup scipts changed  
names of config and "/var/lock/subsys/zebedee2". But : when I start  
second tunnel, first telnet tunnel is down, both port of the  
"serverport" are avaible, so sockets of zebedees are open.
   So where I made a mistake ?
   Thanks and best regards
   J.K.

--

-- 
Ma domena pouziva zabezpeceni a kontrolu SPF (www.openspf.org) a  
DomainKeys/DKIM (with ADSP) . Pokud mate problemy s dorucenim emailu,  
zacnete pouzivat metody overeni puvody emailu zminene vyse. Dekuji.
My domain use SPF (www.openspf.org) and DomainKeys/DKIM (with ADSP)  
policy and check. If you've problem with sending emails to me, start  
using email origin methods mentioned above. Thank you.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Attachment: application/pgp-keys, 1336 bytes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of 
discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model 
(Continue reading)

Magnus Wedberg | 6 Dec 11:44
Favicon

Re: Zebedee and two differend tunnels.

Josef Karliak wrote, On 2011-12-06 11:37:
>   Hi there,
>   I'm tunneling telnet thru zebedee tunnel, I need now another tunelling 
> for MSSQL (that uses udp) and target is different too. I made some 
> configs (port, target, ...) changes into a different config files 
> (client and server of course), in init startup scipts changed names of 
> config and "/var/lock/subsys/zebedee2". But : when I start second 
> tunnel, first telnet tunnel is down, both port of the "serverport" are 
> avaible, so sockets of zebedees are open.
>   So where I made a mistake ?

If the second target is on the same net, you should be able to add 
another target without using a different process.

I have never used multiple processes on the same server host, so I don't 
know if something special is needed.

A complete network chart (client/server, targets and nets) should be 
helpful...

--

-- 
Magnus Wedberg
http://www.magnuswedberg.com/
mw AT 9000.org
Warning! Objects in viewfinder may be closer than they appear.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of 
discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model 
(Continue reading)

Josef Karliak | 6 Dec 15:25
Picon

Re: Zebedee and two differend tunnels.

   Hellou,
   thanks for answer. It is on the same network, same path, only there  
is an another target for mssql

   I've:
   telnet-server (1.2.3.4) <=> zebedee_server (linux router) <=>  
internet <=> zebedee_client (linux router) <=> telnet clients (5.6.7.x)
   I need:
telnet-server (1.2.3.4) and mssql-server (1.2.3.5) <=>  
zebedee_server(linux router) <=> internet <=> zebedee_client (linux  
router) <=> telnet clients and mssql clients (5.6.7.x)

   So I'll look on the second target and start zebedee with -u (with UDP)

   Thanks
   J.K.

Cituji Magnus Wedberg <mw@...>:

> Josef Karliak wrote, On 2011-12-06 11:37:
>>   Hi there,
>>   I'm tunneling telnet thru zebedee tunnel, I need now another tunelling
>> for MSSQL (that uses udp) and target is different too. I made some
>> configs (port, target, ...) changes into a different config files
>> (client and server of course), in init startup scipts changed names of
>> config and "/var/lock/subsys/zebedee2". But : when I start second
>> tunnel, first telnet tunnel is down, both port of the "serverport" are
>> avaible, so sockets of zebedees are open.
>>   So where I made a mistake ?
>
(Continue reading)

Tom Sneddon | 14 Dec 05:21

Re: Zebedee and two differend tunnels.

Josef,

I too am using a different Zebedee process for each server that I tunnel 
to and it works fine.  I've included server and client configuration 
examples below.  These are derived from a working tunnel.  Maybe you 
will find a clue to your problem by looking at a working example.

Please report back to the mail list what eventually solves the issue.

Thanks,
    Tom Sneddon

Here's an example server:
-------------------------
verbosity 2          # Slightly more than basic messages.
detached true        # Detach from the command line console.
server true          # Yes, it's a server!
serverport xxxxx     # Listen on this port.  Need hole in firewall.
ipmode both          # Operate in mixed TCP/UDP mode
compression zlib:9   # Allow maximum zlib compression
keylength 256        # Allow keys up to 256 bits
keylifetime 36000    # Shared keys last 10 hours
maxbufsize 2048      # Default is 8192.  16384 dorks up zebedee.
keygenlevel 2        # Generate maximum strength private keys
checksumlevel 3      # Allow maximum strength checksums
minchecksumlevel 0   # Allow no checksums if client requests
# This file should be readable by the user running Zebedee
# but no-one else.
include '/path/to/private.key'
checkidfile '/path/to/clients.id'
(Continue reading)


Gmane