Re: Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind
2005-11-01 00:00:27 GMT
Valdis Kletnieks to me: > > This is a Johnny come lately perversion of the real meaning of Trojan > > Horse in reference to software. Trojan Horse, or simply Trojan, > > software has always meant, and still does to anyone with a vague hint > > of historical awareness, software that gets installed under the > > pretense of being something desirable or beneficial but that actually > > has deliberately (on the part of its designer/developer) undesirable > > effects that are (at least initially) hidden or not obvious to the > > intended user(s) of the software. > > Which is particularly amusing, given that the Trojan Horse written about by Homer > was quite specifically a 'remote access Trojan' - a very small number of soldiers > were hidden inside to open the gates for the main forces. If anything, the > use of the term to mean "remote access Trojan" is getting back in line with the > *actual* historical meaning - uses of "Trojan" for non-remote-access back doors > were in fact not strictly historically correct... Two observations here... First, I note that "bkfsec" has already pointed out that in the Homerian tale, "Trojan Horse" refers to the horse itself, whose job was to misdirect the Trojans -- they were supposed to see it as a gift, rather than as a poison pill. The important notion here is the obfuscation of the real intention of the device, as "Trojan Horse software" came to mean "something apparently desirable that is not". Second, I _suspect_ (but was not active in that community, so...) that the original _common_ use of Trojan Horse in relation to software was in the relation to the various warez designed to backdoor BBS systems(Continue reading)
RSS Feed