Nico Hoffmann | 2 Dec 16:16 2010
Picon

Build Environment

Hello!

I would like to know if anyone has a good howto for setting up a
build/development machine for compiling and building endian rpms for
production. I found various things for the old versions, but somehow
these do not apply for the actual version (2.4.1).

Any help is appreciated!

Best regards,

Nico

--

-- 
Nico Hoffmann

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
Lorenzo Milesi | 3 Dec 10:08 2010
Picon

Problem creating QoS rule

Hi.
I'm triyng to create a QoS rule in 2.4.1.
My options are:
Sender: any
Interface: Upling - high priority
Service: SIP
TOS/DSCP: TOS
Flag tos: Maximize-Reliability
Enabled: yes

but when I press "Add rule" it always says "some error" next to the Flag tos drop-down.
Why? am I missing something?

thanks
--

-- 
Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi@...

YetOpen S.r.l. - http://www.yetopen.it/
Via Carlo Torri Tarelli 19 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY -
Tel 0341 220 205 - Fax 178 6070 222

GPG/PGP Key-Id: 0xE704E230 - http://keyserver.linux.it

-------- D.Lgs. 196/2003 --------

Si avverte che tutte le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono
riservate ed a uso esclusivo del destinatario. Nel caso in cui questo
messaggio Le fosse pervenuto per errore, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo
senza copiarlo, a non inoltrarlo a terzi e ad avvertirci non appena
possibile.
(Continue reading)

Lorenzo Milesi | 3 Dec 09:36 2010
Picon

Problem creating QoS rule

Hi.
I'm triyng to create a QoS rule in 2.4.1.
My options are:
Sender: any
Interface: Upling - high priority
Service: SIP
TOS/DSCP: TOS
Flag tos: Maximize-Reliability
Enabled: yes

but when I press "Add rule" it always says "some error" next to the Flag tos drop-down.
Why? am I missing something?

thanks
--

-- 
Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi@...

YetOpen S.r.l. - http://www.yetopen.it/
Via Carlo Torri Tarelli 19 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY -
Tel 0341 220 205 - Fax 178 6070 222

GPG/PGP Key-Id: 0xE704E230 - http://keyserver.linux.it

-------- D.Lgs. 196/2003 --------

Si avverte che tutte le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono
riservate ed a uso esclusivo del destinatario. Nel caso in cui questo
messaggio Le fosse pervenuto per errore, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo
senza copiarlo, a non inoltrarlo a terzi e ad avvertirci non appena
possibile.
(Continue reading)

Lorenzo Milesi | 5 Dec 18:15 2010
Picon

Problems creating DNAT rule

Hi.
I'd like to create a rule which allow a port forwarding only from a single source ip.

I go in Firewall > Port forwarding > Create new rule.
In the first option box I choose net/ip/range and put the source IP from which I'd like the forwarding to work.
I compile the rest, apply setting, but it won't work.
Instead, if I allow from AYN uplink it works...

Am I doing something wrong?
thanks
-- 
Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi@...

YetOpen S.r.l. - http://www.yetopen.it/
Via Carlo Torri Tarelli 19 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY -
Tel 0341 220 205 - Fax 178 6070 222

GPG/PGP Key-Id: 0xE704E230 - http://keyserver.linux.it

-------- D.Lgs. 196/2003 --------

Si avverte che tutte le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono
riservate ed a uso esclusivo del destinatario. Nel caso in cui questo
messaggio Le fosse pervenuto per errore, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo
senza copiarlo, a non inoltrarlo a terzi e ad avvertirci non appena
possibile.
Grazie.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly 
(Continue reading)

Lorenzo Milesi | 5 Dec 23:08 2010
Picon

Re: Problems creating DNAT rule

I tried creating the rule both with FF4 and Chrome9, same result.
Today I gave a run using Opera, and it worked.
I've noticed several bugs in EFW web interface, browser related.

----- Messaggio originale -----
> Da: "Lorenzo Milesi" <lorenzo.milesi@...>
> A: "efw-user" <efw-user@...>
> Inviato: Domenica, 5 dicembre 2010 18:15:02
> Oggetto: [Efw-user] Problems creating DNAT rule
> Hi.
> I'd like to create a rule which allow a port forwarding only from a
> single source ip.
> 
> I go in Firewall > Port forwarding > Create new rule.
> In the first option box I choose net/ip/range and put the source IP
> from which I'd like the forwarding to work.
> I compile the rest, apply setting, but it won't work.
> Instead, if I allow from AYN uplink it works...
> 
> Am I doing something wrong?
> thanks
> --
> Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi@...
> 
> YetOpen S.r.l. - http://www.yetopen.it/
> Via Carlo Torri Tarelli 19 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY -
> Tel 0341 220 205 - Fax 178 6070 222
> 
> GPG/PGP Key-Id: 0xE704E230 - http://keyserver.linux.it
> 
(Continue reading)

russ421 | 16 Dec 05:26 2010
Picon

Inter-Zone Firewall Blocking Traffic on Green (Port 137/138)


I'm using the default inter-zone traffic settings for the firewall, which shows it allows GREEN -> GREEN ANY.  However, I am logging blocked packets on the firewall, and I see this:

INPUTFW:DROP UDP (br0) 192.168.1.199:137 -> 192.168.1.255:137

It seems it is still blocking inter-zone traffic - the GREEN interface is configured on the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet.

Anyone have any ideas how to stop this?  It even happens if I turn off the inter-zone firewall altogether.  The only thing that looks different in the logs to me is that blocked traffic from the uplink state INPUT:DROP, whereas these inter-zone logs say INPUTFW:DROP.

I tried adding IP addresses specifically to the inter-zone firewall as well, setting it to allow FROM 192.168.7.199 to 192.168.7.255 on TCP+UDP ports 137/138, and it still shows that it drops them.

I've tried turning off services such as IPS as well, without any luck.  Does anyone have any idea at all?  If you look at your logs, do you see these dropped packets as well?  Just running a simple 'net view /domain' on a windows box on green will force it to make the attempt, and for me it generates the dropped packets in the live firewall log every time.

The way the hardware is configured is eth0 (which automatically runs as br0) is green, and eth1 is red, if it makes a difference.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
Kevin Murphy | 16 Dec 12:48 2010
Picon

Re: Inter-Zone Firewall Blocking Traffic on Green (Port 137/138)

Hi,
I think you will find that this is broadcast traffic on the green lan.  The firewall rule that will be causing
this to be dropped will be in the system access rules.  I wouldn't worry about it if i were you.  Also, setting
the allow green to green - forward any only has any effect if you have more than one green interface in your system.

Kevin

Sent from my HTC

-----Original Message-----
From: <russ421@...>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:28
To: efw-user@...
Subject: [Efw-user] Inter-Zone Firewall Blocking Traffic on Green (Port 137/138)

I'm using the default inter-zone traffic settings for the firewall, which shows it allows GREEN -> GREEN
ANY.  However, I am logging blocked packets on the firewall, and I see this:

 INPUTFW:DROP UDP (br0) 192.168.1.199:137 -> 192.168.1.255:137

 It seems it is still blocking inter-zone traffic - the GREEN interface is configured on the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet.

 Anyone have any ideas how to stop this?  It even happens if I turn off the inter-zone firewall
altogether.  The only thing that looks different in the logs to me is that blocked traffic from the uplink
state INPUT:DROP, whereas these inter-zone logs say INPUTFW:DROP.

 I tried adding IP addresses specifically to the inter-zone firewall as well, setting it to allow FROM
192.168.7.199 to 192.168.7.255 on TCP+UDP ports 137/138, and it still shows that it drops them.

 I've tried turning off services such as IPS as well, without any luck.  Does anyone have any idea at all? 
If you look at your logs, do you see these dropped packets as well?  Just running a simple 'net view
/domain' on a windows box on green will force it to make the attempt, and for me it generates the dropped
packets in the live firewall log every time.

 The way the hardware is configured is eth0 (which automatically runs as br0) is green, and eth1 is red, if it
makes a difference.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
Necip Celepci | 20 Dec 15:18 2010
Picon

efw blocking this site

Hi guys,
efw blocking this site. What is the problem. This site official site of Turkey..
can ypu help me..

<a href="http://www.imgant.com/pt-3129283931810.html" title="error endian" ><img src="http://www.imgant.com/dt-3129283931810.png" alt="error endian" /></a>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
Andres Gonzalez | 29 Dec 19:14 2010
Picon

2.4.1 install freezes

Hi, I'm trying to install EFW CE 2.4.1 but the installation get freezes at 94% (efw-spamassassing package).

Any idea ?

Regards,
Andres

--
AGD

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
compdoc | 29 Dec 22:49 2010

Re: 2.4.1 install freezes

Could be: bad download, bad cd media, bad cdrom drive, incompatible hardware…

 

What hardware are you installing on?

 

From: Andres Gonzalez [mailto:tuchoz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:14 AM
To: efw-user-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Efw-user] 2.4.1 install freezes

 

Hi, I'm trying to install EFW CE 2.4.1 but the installation get freezes at 94% (efw-spamassassing package).

Any idea ?

Regards,
Andres

--
AGD

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

Gmane