Dear Board,
The motion with the identifier m20130512.1 has been accepted.
Motion:
Accept the minutes for 2013-04-21
https://wiki.cacert.org/Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/MeetingAgendasAndMinutes/20130421#Minutes
Proposed: Werner
Seconded: Michael
Vote type: motion
Ayes: 3
Nayes: 0
Abstentions: 1
Percentage: 100%
Kind regards,
the voting system.
Dear Board,
The motion with the identifier m20130512.2 has been accepted.
Motion:
New Infrastructure Server
I move that CAcert favours the more expensive configuration as sent per mail and pays the difference
between the sponsoring from Thomas Krenn and the donations available at secure-u for that purpose from
CAcert capital.
Proposed: Michael
Seconded: Werner
Vote type: motion
Ayes: 5
Nayes: 0
Abstentions: 0
Percentage: 100%
Kind regards,
the voting system.
Dear Board, Michael Tänzer has made the following motion: Accept the minutes for 2013-04-28 https://wiki.cacert.org/Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/MeetingAgendasAndMinutes/20130428#Minutes Vote type: motion Voting will close 2013-05-19 23:59:59 UTC. To vote please choose: Aye: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/vote.php?motion=439&vote=1 Naye: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/vote.php?motion=439&vote=-1 Abstain: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/vote.php?motion=439&vote=0 To see all your outstanding votes : https://community.cacert.org:443/board/motions.php?unvoted=1 Kind regards, the voting system
Dear Board, Michael Tänzer has made the following motion: New Infrastructure Server I move that CAcert favours the more expensive configuration as sent per mail and pays the difference between the sponsoring from Thomas Krenn and the donations available at secure-u for that purpose from CAcert capital. Proposed: Michael Seconded: Werner Vote type: motion Voting will close 2013-05-15 23:59:59 UTC. To vote please choose: Aye: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/vote.php?motion=438&vote=1 Naye: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/vote.php?motion=438&vote=-1 Abstain: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/vote.php?motion=438&vote=0 To see all your outstanding votes : https://community.cacert.org:443/board/motions.php?unvoted=1 Kind regards, the voting system
Dear Board, Michael Tänzer has modified motion m20130512.1 to the following: Accept the minutes for 2013-04-21 https://wiki.cacert.org/Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/MeetingAgendasAndMinutes/20130421#Minutes Proposed: Werner Seconded: Michael Vote type: motion To vote please choose: Aye: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/?vote.php?motion=437&vote=1 Naye: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/?vote.php?motion=437&vote=-1 Abstain: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/?vote.php?motion=437&vote=0 Please be aware, that if you have voted already your vote is still registered and valid. If this modification has an impact on how you wish to vote, you are responsible for voting again. To see all your outstanding votes : https://community.cacert.org:443/board/?motions.php?unvoted=1 Kind regards, the voting system
Dear Board, Michael Tänzer has made the following motion: Accept the minutes for 2013-04-21 https://wiki.cacert.org/Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/MeetingAgendasAndMinutes/20130421#Minutes Vote type: motion Voting will close 2013-05-15 23:59:59 UTC. To vote please choose: Aye: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/vote.php?motion=437&vote=1 Naye: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/vote.php?motion=437&vote=-1 Abstain: https://community.cacert.org:443/board/vote.php?motion=437&vote=0 To see all your outstanding votes : https://community.cacert.org:443/board/motions.php?unvoted=1 Kind regards, the voting system
Hi,
as already announced in the last board meeting the next meeting will be at
Sunday 2013-05-12 11:00 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Board+Meeting&iso=20130512T11
Agenda is here:
https://wiki.cacert.org/Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/MeetingAgendasAndMinutes/20130512
--
--
See you
Michael Tänzer
Dear Board,
The motion with the identifier m20130428.3 has been accepted.
Motion:
Add micropayment buttons to non-critical infrastructure services
Add micropayment buttons to non-critical infrastructure services. Treasurer is asked to pick the
specific service provider(s) and set up all necessary accounts.
Vote type: motion
Ayes: 4
Nayes: 0
Abstentions: 0
Percentage: 100%
Kind regards,
the voting system.
Dear Board,
The motion with the identifier m20130428.2 has been accepted.
Motion:
Representation of cacert in transferring Oophaga to secure-u!
dirk astrath is appointed to represent the point of cacert in the discussions of transferring Oophaga to
secure-u!. This does not extend to make contracts in the name of CAcert, those should be brought before the
CAcert board when ready.
Vote type: motion
Ayes: 4
Nayes: 0
Abstentions: 0
Percentage: 100%
Kind regards,
the voting system.
Dear Board,
The motion with the identifier m20130428.1 has been accepted.
Motion:
Accept the minutes from the meeting 2013-03-24
Vote type: motion
Ayes: 3
Nayes: 0
Abstentions: 1
Percentage: 100%
Kind regards,
the voting system.
Dear Jochim, Mario, Dear Teamleaders of teams falling under SP (Board as fallback for Access Engineers team) Dear Dirk (in role as observer in the ABC interview), Dear Arbitration Team, Regarding Arbitration case a20130125.1 https://wiki.cacert.org/Arbitrations/a20130125.1 "ABC request over Jochim Selzer in role as email admin" I hereby come to the following ruling: == Ruling == The ruling I've split in 3 parts to answer the different questions, that come out of this ABC request 1. Ruling over ABC requests in general, not only covered by SP specific roles 1. Ruling to ABC request over Jochim Selzer 1. Recommendations to teamleaders and Arbitration team for future ABC requests === Part 1 === The original request "ABC over Jochim Selzer" is not intended to be requireded as per SP definition, so therefor the ruling has to cover first the question, if ABC requests that aren't intended for a critical role falling under SP can be handled by Arbitration. As found in the long deliberations, we have issues, there it makes sense, to have ABC'd members at hand, to be nominated to a new team (eg. Roots Escrow team) without prior explicit nominitations. The nomination procedures can by simply turned around. First pass as many ABC's, then forward request for nomination of ABC'd members to a team falling under SP to Board to receive their final nomination to a team. This procedure follows common practice in Assurance area, where bonafide Assurers gets their first educated assurance in a F2F meeting and later fullfils the requirements for a specific job (-> become a CAcert(Continue reading)
RSS Feed20 | |
|---|---|
16 | |
26 | |
24 | |
15 | |
41 | |
144 | |
48 | |
16 | |
38 | |
50 | |
66 | |
31 | |
49 | |
44 | |
24 | |
74 | |
95 | |
70 | |
26 | |
37 | |
32 | |
63 | |
24 | |
103 | |
41 | |
210 | |
169 | |
44 | |
46 | |
84 | |
20 | |
112 | |
105 | |
99 | |
94 | |
54 | |
102 | |
146 | |
102 | |
210 | |
156 | |
254 | |
71 | |
342 | |
398 | |
448 | |
288 | |
324 | |
23 | |
24 | |
129 | |
120 | |
64 |
