1 Jul 2007 13:38
Re: Re: [Xapian-commits] 9092: trunk/xapian-core/ trunk/xapian-core/api/ trunk/xapian-core/common/ trunk/xapian-core/include/xapian/
Olly Betts <olly <at> survex.com>
2007-07-01 11:38:07 GMT
2007-07-01 11:38:07 GMT
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 06:27:01PM +0100, Richard Boulton wrote: > I was thinking that it would probably be useful to have a > Xapian::Document::get_database_name() method, to allow the database that > a document came from (in a multi-database situation) to be obtained. What do you see this new method being useful for? Not saying it isn't useful, but I don't see a use immediately - in the case of wanting to be able to "refile" a modified document, there can only be one database (we don't support writable multi-databases). It might be better to simply return the "multi-docid" here rather than introduce API complications. > For a Flint database, this would return the path that was used to open > the database. For a remote (TCP) database, it would return a string > indicating the host and port that the database is at (probably in a > pseudo URL form something like "remotetcp://host:port/"), and something > similar for a remote progsrv database. Not sure what an inmemory one > would return... We already have a "textual form" for most database backends - that used in a stub database file. There isn't one for InMemory though. > Alternatively, databases could have a new "set_name()" method which sets > the name to return (possibly with something like the above as the > default) to avoid having to do long string compares to work out which > database a document came from. Note that long string comparisons are only really slower than short ones if there are a lot of non-matches with a long prefix that matches the(Continue reading)
RSS Feed