headers
Lars Johannesen | 7 Aug 2007 09:08
Picon

Regarding status of GtkExtra

Hello,

I have been using GtkExtra together with php-gtk2, and doing my 
development I have had some problems with gtkextra such as bad memory 
deallocation. I tried submitting a patch at

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1695966&group_id=11638&atid=111638 
but no response it seems?

After that I have been  creating other similar patches and added 
functions, is the gtkextra project stille alive or ?

Thanks in advance

Best regards
Lars

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Nickolai Dobrynin | 9 Aug 2007 07:42
Picon

Re: Regarding status of GtkExtra

Dear Lars,

I am, like yourself, an "ordinary" GtkExtra user, and I do believe
that the project is
alive, albeit too slow in its move these days.  I browsed the source
code rep just now,
and the last change appeared to have been made as recently as three weeks ago.
This gives you a hint that the project is in CriticalButStableCondition. (TM)

Anyways, I, personally, would recommend that you wait until someone with
write-access finds a minute and looks at your patch.  Also, I am wondering if
this would make sense to re-submit the patch via e-mail.  This may or may not
be necessary.  Just for added certainty.

I've seen people waiting for weeks, even months, before their patches were
validated.  That's the saddest part.  :(

Good luck,

Nickolai Dobrynin

On 8/7/07, Lars Johannesen <cipherz <at> slamsoft.dk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been using GtkExtra together with php-gtk2, and doing my
> development I have had some problems with gtkextra such as bad memory
> deallocation. I tried submitting a patch at
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1695966&group_id=11638&atid=111638
> but no response it seems?
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
jcupitt | 9 Aug 2007 09:08
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Regarding status of GtkExtra

I sent in (almost exactly) this patch about a year ago (6/8/06) by
email and Adrian fixed it in CVS. The email archive seems to be down
sadly.

I've had to make my own gtkextra and paste the source into my
application until this is released :-( not very satisfactory. Like
you, I've made a numberof other improvements too. Maybe we should
coordinate?

John

On 8/9/07, Nickolai Dobrynin <ndobrynin <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyways, I, personally, would recommend that you wait until someone with
> write-access finds a minute and looks at your patch.  Also, I am wondering if
> this would make sense to re-submit the patch via e-mail.  This may or may not
> be necessary.  Just for added certainty.
>
> On 8/7/07, Lars Johannesen <cipherz <at> slamsoft.dk> wrote:
> > I have been using GtkExtra together with php-gtk2, and doing my
> > development I have had some problems with gtkextra such as bad memory
> > deallocation. I tried submitting a patch at
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1695966&group_id=11638&atid=111638
> > but no response it seems?
> >
> > After that I have been  creating other similar patches and added
> > functions, is the gtkextra project stille alive or ?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Lars Johannesen | 9 Aug 2007 11:30
Picon

Re: Regarding status of GtkExtra

Hello, and thanks for the quick replies :)

Nickolai Dobrynin wrote:
> Dear Lars,
>
> I am, like yourself, an "ordinary" GtkExtra user, and I do believe
> that the project is
> alive, albeit too slow in its move these days.  I browsed the source
> code rep just now,
> and the last change appeared to have been made as recently as three weeks ago.
> This gives you a hint that the project is in CriticalButStableCondition. (TM)
>   
Ok I must admit I just downloaded the tar-ball, my mistake there. The 
timestamp on the tarball and the status of the bug database on the 
gtkextra sourceforge page I thought the project was dead for the time being.
> Anyways, I, personally, would recommend that you wait until someone with
> write-access finds a minute and looks at your patch.  Also, I am wondering if
> this would make sense to re-submit the patch via e-mail.  This may or may not
> be necessary.  Just for added certainty.
>   
I pasted an url to indicate when I had posted it instead of just writing 
a timestamp in the email, should have done that instead maybe *shrug*
> I've seen people waiting for weeks, even months, before their patches were
> validated.  That's the saddest part.  :(
>   
Maybe this indicates that the development team could use an extra hand ?
>
> Good luck,
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane