Jamu Kakar | 3 Jan 2012 23:26
Picon
Gravatar

Storm packages in the PPA are broken for oneiric

Hi,

The Storm packages for 0.19 on oneiric are broken.  They only contain
docs.  I don't have time to deal with it right now, but if someone
else does, please step up. :)

Thanks,
J.

alex dragulescu | 28 Jan 2012 01:58
Picon

broken package in oneiric i386

the package is still incomplete. can anyone please fix it?
many thanks

alex

Janne Jokitalo | 28 Jan 2012 03:43
Picon
Favicon

Storm packaging for oneiric

Hi,

sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0] that I'm
responding to.

I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the
Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the
--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter.

This seems to fix it for me:

$ bzr diff rules
=== modified file 'debian/rules'
--- debian/rules	2011-10-05 12:07:39 +0000
+++ debian/rules	2012-01-28 02:33:43 +0000
 <at>  <at>  -21,7 +21,7  <at>  <at> 

 ifeq ($(use_dh_python2),yes)
 %:
-	dh $ <at>  --with python2
+	dh --buildsystem=python_distutils $ <at>  --with python2

However, since I'm not a packaging expert, nor especially a Python packaging
expert, I'll let the more knowledgeable tell me what other issues this could
cause.

[0] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/storm/2012-January/001438.html

--

-- 
Jaska
(Continue reading)

Barry Warsaw | 30 Jan 2012 17:46
Favicon

Re: Storm packaging for oneiric

On Jan 28, 2012, at 04:43 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:

>sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0]
>that I'm responding to.
>
>I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the
>Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the
>--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter.

Something's odd, but maybe I'm missing context.  The Oneiric python-storm
package seems fine to me:

$ schroot -u root -c oneiric-amd64
(oneiric-amd64)# apt-get install python-storm
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
  python-psycopg2 python-mysqldb python-pysqlite2
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  python-storm
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 130 kB of archives.
After this operation, 815 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/universe python-storm amd64 0.18-1 [130 kB]
Fetched 130 kB in 1s (111 kB/s)        
Selecting previously deselected package python-storm.
(Reading database ... 30724 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking python-storm (from .../python-storm_0.18-1_amd64.deb) ...
Setting up python-storm (0.18-1) ...
(Continue reading)

Alex Dragulescu | 30 Jan 2012 17:54
Picon

Re: Storm packaging for oneiric

It must be a problem for 32 bit packages only then.

On Jan 30, 2012 8:46 AM, "Barry Warsaw" <barry-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
On Jan 28, 2012, at 04:43 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:

>sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0]
>that I'm responding to.
>
>I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the
>Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the
>--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter.

Something's odd, but maybe I'm missing context.  The Oneiric python-storm
package seems fine to me:

$ schroot -u root -c oneiric-amd64
(oneiric-amd64)# apt-get install python-storm
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
 python-psycopg2 python-mysqldb python-pysqlite2
The following NEW packages will be installed:
 python-storm
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 130 kB of archives.
After this operation, 815 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/universe python-storm amd64 0.18-1 [130 kB]
Fetched 130 kB in 1s (111 kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package python-storm.
(Reading database ... 30724 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking python-storm (from .../python-storm_0.18-1_amd64.deb) ...
Setting up python-storm (0.18-1) ...
(oneiric-amd64)# python -c 'from storm.locals import *'

(no traceback, so it's fine.)

Cheers,
-Barry

--
storm mailing list
storm-33AaDErTWvAAkhNd+W/JZ0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm

<div>
<p>It must be a problem for 32 bit packages only then. </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 30, 2012 8:46 AM, "Barry Warsaw" &lt;<a href="mailto:barry@...">barry@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
On Jan 28, 2012, at 04:43 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:<br><br>
&gt;sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0]<br>
&gt;that I'm responding to.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the<br>
&gt;Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the<br>
&gt;--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter.<br><br>
Something's odd, but maybe I'm missing context. &nbsp;The Oneiric python-storm<br>
package seems fine to me:<br><br>
$ schroot -u root -c oneiric-amd64<br>
(oneiric-amd64)# apt-get install python-storm<br>
Reading package lists... Done<br>
Building dependency tree<br>
Reading state information... Done<br>
Suggested packages:<br>
 &nbsp;python-psycopg2 python-mysqldb python-pysqlite2<br>
The following NEW packages will be installed:<br>
 &nbsp;python-storm<br>
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.<br>
Need to get 130 kB of archives.<br>
After this operation, 815 kB of additional disk space will be used.<br>
Get:1 <a href="http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/" target="_blank">http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/</a> oneiric/universe python-storm amd64 0.18-1 [130 kB]<br>
Fetched 130 kB in 1s (111 kB/s)<br>
Selecting previously deselected package python-storm.<br>
(Reading database ... 30724 files and directories currently installed.)<br>
Unpacking python-storm (from .../python-storm_0.18-1_amd64.deb) ...<br>
Setting up python-storm (0.18-1) ...<br>
(oneiric-amd64)# python -c 'from storm.locals import *'<br><br>
(no traceback, so it's fine.)<br><br>
Cheers,<br>
-Barry<br><br>--<br>
storm mailing list<br><a href="mailto:storm@...">storm@...</a><br>
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm</a><br><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
Barry Warsaw | 30 Jan 2012 17:58
Favicon

Re: Storm packaging for oneiric

On Jan 30, 2012, at 08:54 AM, Alex Dragulescu wrote:

>It must be a problem for 32 bit packages only then.

Works exactly the same in my oneiric-i386 chroot.

-Barry
On Jan 30, 2012, at 08:54 AM, Alex Dragulescu wrote:

>It must be a problem for 32 bit packages only then.

Works exactly the same in my oneiric-i386 chroot.

-Barry
Janne Jokitalo | 30 Jan 2012 18:01
Picon
Favicon

Re: Storm packaging for oneiric

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46:25AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2012, at 04:43 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
> 
> >sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0]
> >that I'm responding to.
> >
> >I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the
> >Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the
> >--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter.
> 
> Something's odd, but maybe I'm missing context.  The Oneiric python-storm
> package seems fine to me:

I'm sorry, I seem to have mixed things. The more recent email (one that I failed
to link to, even) spoke about the package in PPA.

My apologies!

-- 
Jaska

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46:25AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2012, at 04:43 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
> 
> >sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0]
> >that I'm responding to.
> >
> >I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the
> >Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the
> >--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter.
> 
> Something's odd, but maybe I'm missing context.  The Oneiric python-storm
> package seems fine to me:

I'm sorry, I seem to have mixed things. The more recent email (one that I failed
to link to, even) spoke about the package in PPA.

My apologies!

--

-- 
Jaska

Barry Warsaw | 30 Jan 2012 18:04
Favicon

Re: Storm packaging for oneiric

On Jan 30, 2012, at 07:01 PM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:

>I'm sorry, I seem to have mixed things. The more recent email (one that I
>failed to link to, even) spoke about the package in PPA.
>
>My apologies!

Ah.  No worries!  I'll let one of the other Storm devs fix that then. :)

Cheers,
-Barry
On Jan 30, 2012, at 07:01 PM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:

>I'm sorry, I seem to have mixed things. The more recent email (one that I
>failed to link to, even) spoke about the package in PPA.
>
>My apologies!

Ah.  No worries!  I'll let one of the other Storm devs fix that then. :)

Cheers,
-Barry

Gmane