3 Jan 2012 23:26
28 Jan 2012 01:58
28 Jan 2012 03:43
Storm packaging for oneiric
Hi, sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0] that I'm responding to. I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the --buildsystem=python_disutils parameter. This seems to fix it for me: $ bzr diff rules === modified file 'debian/rules' --- debian/rules 2011-10-05 12:07:39 +0000 +++ debian/rules 2012-01-28 02:33:43 +0000 <at> <at> -21,7 +21,7 <at> <at> ifeq ($(use_dh_python2),yes) %: - dh $ <at> --with python2 + dh --buildsystem=python_distutils $ <at> --with python2 However, since I'm not a packaging expert, nor especially a Python packaging expert, I'll let the more knowledgeable tell me what other issues this could cause. [0] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/storm/2012-January/001438.html -- -- Jaska(Continue reading)
30 Jan 2012 17:46
Re: Storm packaging for oneiric
On Jan 28, 2012, at 04:43 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote: >sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0] >that I'm responding to. > >I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the >Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the >--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter. Something's odd, but maybe I'm missing context. The Oneiric python-storm package seems fine to me: $ schroot -u root -c oneiric-amd64 (oneiric-amd64)# apt-get install python-storm Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Suggested packages: python-psycopg2 python-mysqldb python-pysqlite2 The following NEW packages will be installed: python-storm 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 130 kB of archives. After this operation, 815 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/universe python-storm amd64 0.18-1 [130 kB] Fetched 130 kB in 1s (111 kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package python-storm. (Reading database ... 30724 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking python-storm (from .../python-storm_0.18-1_amd64.deb) ... Setting up python-storm (0.18-1) ...(Continue reading)
30 Jan 2012 17:54
Re: Storm packaging for oneiric
It must be a problem for 32 bit packages only then.
On Jan 30, 2012 8:46 AM, "Barry Warsaw" <barry-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
On Jan 28, 2012, at 04:43 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
>sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0]
>that I'm responding to.
>
>I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the
>Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the
>--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter.
Something's odd, but maybe I'm missing context. The Oneiric python-storm
package seems fine to me:
$ schroot -u root -c oneiric-amd64
(oneiric-amd64)# apt-get install python-storm
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
python-psycopg2 python-mysqldb python-pysqlite2
The following NEW packages will be installed:
python-storm
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 130 kB of archives.
After this operation, 815 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/universe python-storm amd64 0.18-1 [130 kB]
Fetched 130 kB in 1s (111 kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package python-storm.
(Reading database ... 30724 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking python-storm (from .../python-storm_0.18-1_amd64.deb) ...
Setting up python-storm (0.18-1) ...
(oneiric-amd64)# python -c 'from storm.locals import *'
(no traceback, so it's fine.)
Cheers,
-Barry
--
storm mailing list
storm-33AaDErTWvAAkhNd+W/JZ0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
<div> <p>It must be a problem for 32 bit packages only then. </p> <div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 30, 2012 8:46 AM, "Barry Warsaw" <<a href="mailto:barry@...">barry@...</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> On Jan 28, 2012, at 04:43 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:<br><br> >sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0]<br> >that I'm responding to.<br> ><br> >I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the<br> >Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the<br> >--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter.<br><br> Something's odd, but maybe I'm missing context. The Oneiric python-storm<br> package seems fine to me:<br><br> $ schroot -u root -c oneiric-amd64<br> (oneiric-amd64)# apt-get install python-storm<br> Reading package lists... Done<br> Building dependency tree<br> Reading state information... Done<br> Suggested packages:<br> python-psycopg2 python-mysqldb python-pysqlite2<br> The following NEW packages will be installed:<br> python-storm<br> 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.<br> Need to get 130 kB of archives.<br> After this operation, 815 kB of additional disk space will be used.<br> Get:1 <a href="http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/" target="_blank">http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/</a> oneiric/universe python-storm amd64 0.18-1 [130 kB]<br> Fetched 130 kB in 1s (111 kB/s)<br> Selecting previously deselected package python-storm.<br> (Reading database ... 30724 files and directories currently installed.)<br> Unpacking python-storm (from .../python-storm_0.18-1_amd64.deb) ...<br> Setting up python-storm (0.18-1) ...<br> (oneiric-amd64)# python -c 'from storm.locals import *'<br><br> (no traceback, so it's fine.)<br><br> Cheers,<br> -Barry<br><br>--<br> storm mailing list<br><a href="mailto:storm@...">storm@...</a><br> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm</a><br><br> </blockquote> </div> </div>
30 Jan 2012 17:58
Re: Storm packaging for oneiric
On Jan 30, 2012, at 08:54 AM, Alex Dragulescu wrote: >It must be a problem for 32 bit packages only then. Works exactly the same in my oneiric-i386 chroot. -Barry
On Jan 30, 2012, at 08:54 AM, Alex Dragulescu wrote: >It must be a problem for 32 bit packages only then. Works exactly the same in my oneiric-i386 chroot. -Barry
30 Jan 2012 18:01
Re: Storm packaging for oneiric
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46:25AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jan 28, 2012, at 04:43 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote: > > >sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0] > >that I'm responding to. > > > >I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the > >Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the > >--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter. > > Something's odd, but maybe I'm missing context. The Oneiric python-storm > package seems fine to me: I'm sorry, I seem to have mixed things. The more recent email (one that I failed to link to, even) spoke about the package in PPA. My apologies! -- Jaska
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46:25AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jan 28, 2012, at 04:43 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote: > > >sorry for a little bit messy email, I had already deleted the original [0] > >that I'm responding to. > > > >I believe the reason for oneiric packages missing everything but doc/ is the > >Makefile in root directory. This can be overridden by the > >--buildsystem=python_disutils parameter. > > Something's odd, but maybe I'm missing context. The Oneiric python-storm > package seems fine to me: I'm sorry, I seem to have mixed things. The more recent email (one that I failed to link to, even) spoke about the package in PPA. My apologies! -- -- Jaska
30 Jan 2012 18:04
Re: Storm packaging for oneiric
On Jan 30, 2012, at 07:01 PM, Janne Jokitalo wrote: >I'm sorry, I seem to have mixed things. The more recent email (one that I >failed to link to, even) spoke about the package in PPA. > >My apologies! Ah. No worries! I'll let one of the other Storm devs fix that then. :) Cheers, -Barry
On Jan 30, 2012, at 07:01 PM, Janne Jokitalo wrote: >I'm sorry, I seem to have mixed things. The more recent email (one that I >failed to link to, even) spoke about the package in PPA. > >My apologies! Ah. No worries! I'll let one of the other Storm devs fix that then. :) Cheers, -Barry
RSS Feed