1 Feb 11:48
Re: scipy.splinalg or bust
Robert Cimrman <cimrman3 <at> ntc.zcu.cz>
2008-02-01 10:48:49 GMT
2008-02-01 10:48:49 GMT
Nathan Bell wrote: > On Jan 31, 2008 9:21 AM, Robert Cimrman <cimrman3 <at> ntc.zcu.cz> wrote: >> Great! what about allowing the LinearOperator.__init__() to take care of >> the cases that aslinearoperator() takes care of? Or >> LinearOperator.fromany()/fromAny() static/class method? > > I considered that approach but decided against it. I like keeping > LinearOperator dead simple since it's what end users will have to > understand if they want to hook up their matrix-like objects to scipy > solvers. Currently aslinearoperator() is the part that "knows" about > scipy/numpy while LinearOperator is just an abstract interface. > > Another practical issue is that LinearOperator needs to be initialized > with at least two arguments (shape and matvec) while > aslinearoperator() only accepts one. The classmethod approach avoids > this, but I have a (possibly irrational) dislike for classmethods :) > > Scipy users should understand asarray(), so I think aslinearoperator() > is a fairly natural extension. Ok, I have nothing against :) r.
RSS Feed