1 Jul 03:22
Re: Memory leaks
John Hunter wrote: > On 6/30/07, Eric Firing <efiring@...> wrote: >> Mike, >> >> All this sounds like great progress--thanks! I particularly appreciate >> the descriptions of what problems you found and how you found them. >> >> John et al.: is there a maintainer for each of these backends? I think > > gtk: Steve Chaplin or me > wx: Ken McIvor > qt: Darren? > tk: Charlie? > > After we get these patches in, we can just give Michael commit > privileges(Continue reading)I can probably look at this Monday, but if you want to > commit and test some of these before then, please do so. Done. It looks like there is still plenty of memory leakage, but there are improvements, and the huge list of uncollectable garbage with tkAgg is gone. I also made memleak_gui.py more flexible with arguments. For example, here are tests with three backends, a generous number of loops, and suppression of intermediate output: python ../unit/memleak_gui.py -d wx -s 500 -e 1000 -q uncollectable list: []
I can probably look at this Monday, but if you want to
> commit and test some of these before then, please do so.
Done. It looks like there is still plenty of memory leakage, but there
are improvements, and the huge list of uncollectable garbage with tkAgg
is gone.
I also made memleak_gui.py more flexible with arguments. For example,
here are tests with three backends, a generous number of loops, and
suppression of intermediate output:
python ../unit/memleak_gui.py -d wx -s 500 -e 1000 -q
uncollectable list: []
Greetings,
Norbert
John Hunter wrote:
> On 6/30/07, Norbert Nemec <
RSS Feed