[pyweb-il:389] Re: a question re pluggable apps
Itay Donenhirsch <bazbazoo <at> gmail.com>
2009-09-01 11:29:32 GMT
is this the accustomed way of extending models? i mean, if I write an
app that needs to be "plugged into" another app's table, does it
usually adds a field to the other app's model or does it do the o2o
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Idan Gazit<idan <at> pixane.com> wrote:
> Ah, just re-read your question and realized it was slightly different.
> For reusable apps, I guess o2o field might be the best solution. Subclassing
> User is not a good idea for a reusable app because you might be stepping on
> the toes of another app.
> On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:23 PM, ofri raviv wrote:
>> I have a question about pluggable apps design: many times, you'd like a
>> new app to add some fields to the basic models you already have. for
>> example, if I have a users app, and i want to add karma (everything good you
>> do on the site gives you good karma points, when you post, when your posts
>> are voted up, etc). it doesn't really matter how the karma app works, in the
>> end, it has to add a karma field to the user model that is already defined
>> in another app.
>> the solution seems to be, add another model, UserKarma, that has
>> user = models.OneToOneField(User, primary_key=True, related_name='karma')
>> and then we can use user.karma.foo to access the fields that karma app
>> is that a good solution? how is it performance-wise compared to just
>> adding the fields to User?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyWeb-IL" group.
To post to this group, send email to pyweb-il <at> googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pyweb-il+unsubscribe <at> googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyweb-il?hl=en
Python-il mailing list
Python-il <at> hamakor.org.il