fred | 1 Jan 13:43
Picon

Re: ETS on a FreeBSD box

Carl Trachte a écrit :

> 
> Beastie and all of his fans (I count myself among them) are interested.
Ok :-)

So what you should I do ?

Write some installation guideline somewhere ?

Cheers,

--

-- 
http://scipy.org/FredericPetit
Carl Trachte | 1 Jan 16:23
Picon

Re: ETS on a FreeBSD box



On 1/1/08, fred <fredmfp-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
Carl Trachte a écrit :

>
> Beastie and all of his fans (I count myself among them) are interested.
Ok :-)

So what you should I do ?

Write some installation guideline somewhere ?

I just meant that it's great you got it going on BSD.  It sounds like writing an installation guideline might be as painful as the actual work of getting the software installed.
If I attempt to do this myself, though, this forum would be the first place I would go for help.
Thanks for posting your success.
Carl T. 

Cheers,

--
http://scipy.org/FredericPetit

_______________________________________________
Enthought-dev mailing list
Enthought-dev-oRDGkvazHdacsI7C1d+pp9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
https://mail.enthought.com/mailman/listinfo/enthought-dev


_______________________________________________
Enthought-dev mailing list
Enthought-dev@...
https://mail.enthought.com/mailman/listinfo/enthought-dev
fred | 1 Jan 18:38
Picon

Re: ETS on a FreeBSD box

Carl Trachte a écrit :

> I just meant that it's great you got it going on BSD.  It sounds like writing an installation guideline might
be as painful as the actual work of getting the software installed.
> If I attempt to do this myself, though, this forum would be the first place I would go for help.

I have mainly installed all stuff from my "old" scipy cookbook.
In the past, Prabhu has qualified it as "daunting" but it really "does 
work ®"... :-))

If I can be of any help for those are "beastie fan"... ;-))

Have to fix a few issues on my vista box, and answer to x86_64 arch 
issues from Prabhu for now... ;-)

Cheers,

--

-- 
http://scipy.org/FredericPetit
Pye Fie | 2 Jan 00:58
Picon

Re: Installing MayaVi 2 on CentOS 5, Python 2.5.1, x86_64

Hi,

you are right. The problem was with VTK visibility. Now it is OK. But there is another issue. I will have to
check it.

cheers,
fie pye

>---------------------------------------------------------
>Od: Prabhu Ramachandran
>Přijato: 23.12.2007 3:38:00
>Předmět: Re: [Enthought-dev] Installing MayaVi 2 on CentOS 5, Python 2.5.1, x86_64
>
>Pye Fie wrote:
>
>>> import enthought.mayayvi.tools.mlab as M
>
>>>
>
>>> M.test_contour3d()
>
>> 
>
>> When I am loading mlab I got the following message:
>
>> <type 'exceptions.ImportError'>: No module named vtk
>
>
>
>Then VTK is either not installed or found.  From Python what do you get 
>
>if you try to import vtk?  Can you look to see if vtk is installed.
>
>
>
>cheers,
>
>prabhu
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>Enthought-dev mailing list
>
>Enthought-dev@...
>
>https://mail.enthought.com/mailman/listinfo/enthought-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>

------------------------------------------

www.icqsms.cz/
_______________________________________________
Enthought-dev mailing list
Enthought-dev@...
https://mail.enthought.com/mailman/listinfo/enthought-dev
Eli Ateljevich | 2 Jan 07:01

editing more than one column in a tabular editor

Hi,
I just started playing with the newish  tabular editor /adapter. I was delighted how it solved a speed
problem that had me pulling hair with previous table editors. However, I am unable to use it for key apps
because editing is limited to the first column. According to the documentation and tutorial this
limitation is attributable to an underlying native widget (I am using windows XP, incidentally). 

Is there a workaround that can be used when more than one column needs to be edited? Text is fine -- I don't need
fancy column editors..

Thanks much,
Eli
David Fokkema | 2 Jan 11:21
Picon
Favicon

Envisage 3.0 only or complete ets 3.0?

Hi list,

In a previous thread, I was encouraged to try out envisage 3.0 instead
of 2.0. Does that mean I'd better use traits 3.0 as well? And what about
Chaco2 which I want to use for plots?

Envisage 3.0 was declared pretty much production ready. Does that mean
the others are as well? Should I just use all of ETS 3? I can't get it
to install on my platform, Ubuntu 7.10, due to missing enthought.python
2.1.0a1.dev. I built from source (trunk), and took the tvtk egg from ets
2.6.0b1, but that has only enthought.python 2.0.1b1.

So, in short, what should I use for building my applications?

Thanks,

David
Martin Chilvers | 2 Jan 11:32
Picon

Re: Envisage 3.0 only or complete ets 3.0?

Hi David,

David Fokkema wrote:
> In a previous thread, I was encouraged to try out envisage 3.0 instead
> of 2.0. Does that mean I'd better use traits 3.0 as well? And what about
> Chaco2 which I want to use for plots?

Yep - Envisage 3.0 needs Traits 3.0 (for Interfaces, adaptation etc)...

> Envisage 3.0 was declared pretty much production ready. Does that mean
> the others are as well? Should I just use all of ETS 3? I can't get it
> to install on my platform, Ubuntu 7.10, due to missing enthought.python
> 2.1.0a1.dev. I built from source (trunk), and took the tvtk egg from ets
> 2.6.0b1, but that has only enthought.python 2.0.1b1.
> 
> So, in short, what should I use for building my applications?

I;m not much help here I'm afraidf - I can only speak for Envisage and like I 
said, I would highly recommend Envisage 3.0!

Martin
David Fokkema | 2 Jan 11:44
Picon
Favicon

Re: Envisage 3.0 only or complete ets 3.0?


On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 10:32 +0000, Martin Chilvers wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> David Fokkema wrote:
> > In a previous thread, I was encouraged to try out envisage 3.0 instead
> > of 2.0. Does that mean I'd better use traits 3.0 as well? And what about
> > Chaco2 which I want to use for plots?
> 
> Yep - Envisage 3.0 needs Traits 3.0 (for Interfaces, adaptation etc)...

I thought as much, good!

> > Envisage 3.0 was declared pretty much production ready. Does that mean
> > the others are as well? Should I just use all of ETS 3? I can't get it
> > to install on my platform, Ubuntu 7.10, due to missing enthought.python
> > 2.1.0a1.dev. I built from source (trunk), and took the tvtk egg from ets
> > 2.6.0b1, but that has only enthought.python 2.0.1b1.
> > 
> > So, in short, what should I use for building my applications?
> 
> I;m not much help here I'm afraidf - I can only speak for Envisage and like I 
> said, I would highly recommend Envisage 3.0!

Looking through the documentation I like it better than 2.0. Envisage
3.0 it is!

Still, some other comments on Chaco2 and/or ETS 3.0 are highly
appreciated!

Thanks,

David
fred | 2 Jan 11:53
Picon

Re: Envisage 3.0 only or complete ets 3.0?

David Fokkema a écrit :

> Still, some other comments on Chaco2 and/or ETS 3.0 are highly
> appreciated!

My 2 cts : I do not have any problem using chaco2 with T3.

Cheers,

--

-- 
http://scipy.org/FredericPetit
David Fokkema | 2 Jan 11:58
Picon
Favicon

Re: Envisage 3.0 only or complete ets 3.0?


On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 11:53 +0100, fred wrote:
> David Fokkema a écrit :
> 
> > Still, some other comments on Chaco2 and/or ETS 3.0 are highly
> > appreciated!
> 
> My 2 cts : I do not have any problem using chaco2 with T3.

Thanks! So far, I'll use envisage 3.0 + dependencies (Traits, ...) and
Chaco2 3.0. Others?

David

_______________________________________________
Enthought-dev mailing list
Enthought-dev <at> mail.enthought.com
https://mail.enthought.com/mailman/listinfo/enthought-dev

Gmane