Fwd: [Bug 242336] Stabilization request for psycopg 2.0.[6|7|8]
Anyone have any idea why John (below) would get that error trying to
import psycopg2 (2.0.8?) This is an obstacle for getting 2.0.8
marked stable on Gentoo.
~ Nathan
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <bugzilla-daemon@...>
Date: Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 1:39 AM
Subject: [Bug 242336] Stabilization request for psycopg 2.0.[6|7|8]
To: nathan.stocks@...
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242336
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242336
------- Comment #1 from john.mcfarlane@... 2008-10-18 07:39
0000 -------
On my box 2.0.7 runs great, but 2.0.8 does not import properly:
jmcfarlane <at> monster # python
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Sep 12 2008, 02:04:02)
[GCC 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.1)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import psycopg2
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/psycopg2/__init__.py", line 60, in
<module>
from _psycopg import BINARY, NUMBER, STRING, DATETIME, ROWID
ImportError: /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so: undefined
symbol: lo_create
>>>
I'm not yet certain if this is a problem local to me or not. Here's my system
info in case anyone recognizes the problem:
jmcfarlane <at> monster # emerge --info
Portage 2.1.4.5 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.1.2, glibc-2.6.1-r0,
2.6.25-gentoo-r7 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.25-gentoo-r7 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 <at> 2.00GHz
Timestamp of tree: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:15:01 +0000
app-shells/bash: 3.2_p33
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.1.6
dev-lang/python: 2.4.4-r14, 2.5.2-r7
sys-apps/baselayout: 1.12.11.1
sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.18.1-r2
sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.61-r2
sys-devel/automake: 1.5, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10.1-r1
sys-devel/binutils: 2.18-r3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.4.0-r4
sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.26
virtual/os-headers: 2.6.23-r3
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=nocona -O2 -pipe"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/
/etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo
/etc/texmf/web2c /etc/udev/rules.d"
CXXFLAGS="-march=nocona -O2 -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="distlocks metadata-transfer parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict
unmerge-orphans userfetch"
LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
We've been having a workaround in
GNUmed for ages where we download bytea fields in
user-definably sized parts with
select substring ( from ... to ...) ...
Karsten
RSS Feed