Re: [Cython] Cython 0.16
On 29 October 2011 17:40, Vitja Makarov <vitja.makarov <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/10/29 Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml <at> behnel.de>:
>> mark florisson, 28.10.2011 22:59:
>>> On 28 October 2011 21:55, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>> With Mark's fused types and memory views going in, I think it's about
>>>> time for a new release.
>> I still haven't investigated the decorator issue that appeared in the Sage
>> tests. I think it's related to decorators on module level def functions,
>> which would suggest that it's best to eventually fix it as part of the
>> function implementation changes that Vitja has started. But there may still
>> be a simpler work-around somewhere that I'm not seeing yet.
> Recently I've implemented py3k-super and dynamic default args if we
> have time. I would see this in release also.
> Can you please point me to sage decorators related failure?
>> I basically broke the Sage tests by resolving a bug (593 IIRC), and both
>> don't currently work together. So, a variant would be to revert my changes
>> for 0.16 and just leave the bug in, if that keeps us from breaking existing