2 Dec 2002 15:22
2 Dec 2002 14:40
2 Dec 2002 11:36
1 Dec 2002 23:11
Re: config.site
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:41:46AM -0500, tsikora@... wrote: > On another note. A line should be added to installpkg/removepkg to > delete the contents of the /install directory after an install. It's > annoying getting the pop-up for duplicates everytime a new package is > installed. Is it an unzip error message? When does it occur? -- -- Who's Taking Over
1 Dec 2002 21:37
wxOS2
ok, did not get much of a response in wxwindows developers group so here
it is. anyone know how to fix this problem?
hi again,
ok, another note, in wxwindows-2.3.4\src\common\intl.cpp there is
missing the define for retloc:
"const wxChar *retloc;"
I clipped this out of 2.3.3 and build is now commencing. I added it in
at line 669 of 2.3.4 just as it was in 2.3.3
also, further into the build process I get the following errors:
Operating System/2 Program Maintenance Utility
Version 3.00.013 Nov 17 1995
Copyright (C) IBM Corporation 1988-1995
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. 1988-1991
All rights reserved.
SYS1248: A subdirectory or file X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4\src\zlib\DebugOS2 already
exists.
touch X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4\lib\os2zlib.lib
del X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4\lib\os2zlib.lib
ilib /NOL /NOE X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4\lib\os2zlib.lib
<at> D:\IBMCPP\TMP\7770000
0.CTN.
Operation(s): ..\zlib\DebugOS2\adler32.obj
..\zlib\DebugOS2\compress.obj ..\
zlib\DebugOS2\crc32.obj ..\zlib\DebugOS2\deflate.obj
..\zlib\DebugOS2\gzio.obj .
.\zlib\DebugOS2\infblock.obj ..\zlib\DebugOS2\infcodes.obj
(Continue reading)
30 Nov 2002 03:57
Re: wxWindows-2.3.4
well, another release that won't build. bombs out on the first file it
tries to compile. This and what errors I had building 2.3.3 seem like
things that would or should be handled way before any release is thought
of. I hope it gets fixed soon.
Ken
copy "X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4"\include\wx\os2\setup.h
"X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4"\include\wx\setup.h
1 file(s) copied.
icc /c /W3 /D__VISAGECPP__ /Ss /Q /N100 /Ti /D__WXDEBUG__
/Siwx.pch /D__WXPM__ -IX:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4\include
-IX:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4/src/jpeg -IX:\WXWINDOW
S-2.3.4/src/zlib -IX:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4/src/tiff
-IX:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4/src/png -IX:
\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4\src\png /Gm /Gd /Fiwx.pch /FoDebugOS2\dummy.obj /Tp
dummy.cpp
X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4\include\wx\chkconf.h(100:9) : error EDC3086:
"wxUSE_PROLOGIOmust be defined."
X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4\include\wx\chkconf.h(1189:9) : error EDC3086: "wxr
resources require PrologIO"
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'G:\OS2\CMD.EXE' : return code '12'
Stop.
Stefan Neis wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Stefan Neis wrote:
>
(Continue reading)
29 Nov 2002 13:15
Re: [UnixOS2] wxWindows-2.3.4
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, John Poltorak wrote: > Are there any OS/2 binaries available of apps built with wxWindows? Well you could build some of the samples ...> It would be interesting to compare them with their Windows or Linux > counterparts. What would you expect to see in that comparision? Regards, Stefan -- -- Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'.
29 Nov 2002 11:31
[UnixOS2] Fwd: [XFreeOS2] New Beta
==================BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE================== I build new binaries for XFree86-4. They can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.netlabs.org/pub/xfree86 Please send problem reports either to this list (preferred) or to my email adress. Changes in XFree86/OS2v4 Beta 2: Port is now based on XFree86 version 4.2.99.2 CVS from November 14. Compiled with gcc-3.0.3. Added some missing entrypoints to Xt.dll for LessTif support. Hopefully it is working now! There still seems to be a problem when using NEdit with more than one window. Fixed server crash caused by use of the XFree86-VidModeExtension (e.g. xvidtune). This revealed a more general and still not entirely solved problem caused by different struct-returns in a.out/LX and ELF format. New xf86sup.sys driver included where Holger fixed some memory map/unmap problems. Should fix some crashes. MesaGL is now included as distributed with XFree86. Because of filename changes existing apps (like the glut library) should be rebuilt to use this version.(Continue reading)
> It would be interesting to compare them with their Windows or Linux
> counterparts.
What would you expect to see in that comparision?
Regards,
Stefan
RSS Feed