Melvyn Sopacua | 1 Jun 2002 17:06
Picon
Favicon

Apache2 static

Hi,

I finally got apache2.0.36 working on BSD/OS with php-4.2.1 - the key being
--without-tsrm on php and --disable-threads on apache2 - prefork mpm only.

However - this breaks both SIGHUP as SIGUSR1 ([Sat Jun 01 16:51:38 2002] 
[notice] seg fault or similar nasty error detected in the parent process).
I know that this is a BSDi dynamic linking thing and therefore use static 
compilation for 1.3.x.

Will there be support for static compilation of php into apache2, as is the 
case with the 1.3.x sapi?

Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,

IDG.nl
Melvyn Sopacua
Webmaster

--

-- 
PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Liz | 2 Jun 2002 14:52
Picon
Picon

Mail bug..

Guys,

I posted on the bugs thing a problem I have found with 4.2 mail
function.. Bug #17541.  Where, to summarise if you did 

mail ("me <at> myhost.com","test","test","To: MyName <me <at> myhost.com>")

which would normally result in a nice test mail with the To: address
showing as the last part, actually comes back as me <at> myhost.com;MyName
<me <at> myhost.com> - ie, duplicating the extras part.

I've had to roll back to 4.1.2 (where it last worked fine) as the system
Ive been writing is going company wide and I want to show them that PHP
rocks, not that it has a silly bug in it.. It could of course, also have
other implications. Depending on exactly why its working that way.

Liz

--

-- 
PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Markus Fischer | 2 Jun 2002 15:38
Picon

Re: Mail bug..

    Which OS ?

On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 01:52:04PM +0100, Liz wrote : 
> Guys,
> 
> I posted on the bugs thing a problem I have found with 4.2 mail
> function.. Bug #17541.  Where, to summarise if you did 
> 
> mail ("me <at> myhost.com","test","test","To: MyName <me <at> myhost.com>")
> 
> which would normally result in a nice test mail with the To: address
> showing as the last part, actually comes back as me <at> myhost.com;MyName
> <me <at> myhost.com> - ie, duplicating the extras part.
> 
> I've had to roll back to 4.1.2 (where it last worked fine) as the system
> Ive been writing is going company wide and I want to show them that PHP
> rocks, not that it has a silly bug in it.. It could of course, also have
> other implications. Depending on exactly why its working that way.
> 
> Liz
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

--

-- 
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
Wishlist EN: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/wishlist_en
Wishlist DE: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/wishlist_de
(Continue reading)

Liz | 2 Jun 2002 15:45
Picon
Picon

RE: Mail bug..

Crappy ol' winblows

Sadly, Im trying to break my companys microsoft adiction, and everyone
whos seen the system Ive made loves it, but, it goes live soon, and it
looks crappy with the double names, so Ive had to go back to 4.1.2.. not
ideal really..

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Markus Fischer [mailto:mfischer <at> guru.josefine.at] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 2:39 PM
> To: Liz
> Cc: php-qa <at> lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] Mail bug..
> 
> 
>     Which OS ?
> 
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 01:52:04PM +0100, Liz wrote : 
> > Guys,
> > 
> > I posted on the bugs thing a problem I have found with 4.2 mail
> > function.. Bug #17541.  Where, to summarise if you did 
> > 
> > mail ("me <at> myhost.com","test","test","To: MyName <me <at> myhost.com>")
> > 
> > which would normally result in a nice test mail with the To: address
> > showing as the last part, actually comes back as 
> me <at> myhost.com;MyName
> > <me <at> myhost.com> - ie, duplicating the extras part.
> > 
(Continue reading)

Markus Fischer | 2 Jun 2002 15:54
Picon

Re: Mail bug..

    Hi,

    rfc822 style addresses aren't supported in the win32/mail
    implementation. I wonder why this worked in 4.2.1 ... I'll
    see if I can fine something.

    - Markus

On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 02:45:33PM +0100, Liz wrote : 
> Crappy ol' winblows
> 
> Sadly, Im trying to break my companys microsoft adiction, and everyone
> whos seen the system Ive made loves it, but, it goes live soon, and it
> looks crappy with the double names, so Ive had to go back to 4.1.2.. not
> ideal really..
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Markus Fischer [mailto:mfischer <at> guru.josefine.at] 
> > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 2:39 PM
> > To: Liz
> > Cc: php-qa <at> lists.php.net
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] Mail bug..
> > 
> > 
> >     Which OS ?
> > 
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 01:52:04PM +0100, Liz wrote : 
> > > Guys,
(Continue reading)

Markus Fischer | 2 Jun 2002 16:00
Picon

Re: Apache2 static

    Hello,

On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 05:06:51PM +0200, Melvyn Sopacua wrote : 
> I finally got apache2.0.36 working on BSD/OS with php-4.2.1 - the key being
> --without-tsrm on php and --disable-threads on apache2 - prefork mpm only.
> 
> However - this breaks both SIGHUP as SIGUSR1 ([Sat Jun 01 16:51:38 2002] 
> [notice] seg fault or similar nasty error detected in the parent process).
> I know that this is a BSDi dynamic linking thing and therefore use static 
> compilation for 1.3.x.
> 
> Will there be support for static compilation of php into apache2, as is the 
> case with the 1.3.x sapi?

    I now one here knows it, only the active maintainers of
    sapi/apache2filter will know probably. I think it's worth
    asking them directly (they're reading php-dev <at>  so it may be
    sufficient to post there).

    - Markus

-- 
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
Wishlist EN: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/wishlist_en
Wishlist DE: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/wishlist_de

--

-- 
PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

(Continue reading)

Markus Fischer | 2 Jun 2002 15:56
Picon

Re: Mail bug..

    Hi,

    just another comment: 1) I meant 4.1.2 :-) 2) if you want to
    show a company that PHP rocks, win32/mail is the worst way to
    do this because it's the most unrelieable thing and doesn't
    feature half of the expected behaviour you get on unix
    platforms ...

    - Markus

On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 03:54:29PM +0200, Markus Fischer wrote : 
>     Hi,
> 
>     rfc822 style addresses aren't supported in the win32/mail
>     implementation. I wonder why this worked in 4.2.1 ... I'll
>     see if I can fine something.
> 
>     - Markus
> 
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 02:45:33PM +0100, Liz wrote : 
> > Crappy ol' winblows
> > 
> > Sadly, Im trying to break my companys microsoft adiction, and everyone
> > whos seen the system Ive made loves it, but, it goes live soon, and it
> > looks crappy with the double names, so Ive had to go back to 4.1.2.. not
> > ideal really..
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
(Continue reading)

Melvyn Sopacua | 2 Jun 2002 19:46
Picon
Favicon

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: User-space functionality of apache2filter

At 18:52 2-6-2002, Daniel BODEA shared with all of us:

>apache2filter is a long way from production status. A previous thread stated
>it's some 6 months away from real beta quality due to the lack of time from
>developers familiar with the apache 2 API. I plan on doing some work on this
>myself but that only means that I'll get to dig into the code in a couple of
>weeks or so.

If there's any good reason for QA, it would be major new SAPI's like this - 
especially
since apache2 itself, has it's own set of problems.

I would therefore welcome some system for apache2filter maintainers, to 
notify QA-team
of a new 'release'. So that portability problems can be detected early on, 
instead of
dealing with the build-system before a major release as there are other 
things to test
before a release.
Experience has taught, that the number of people, that take the time to 
test RC candidates,
is fluctuant at best and I doubt that the upcoming summer break will make 
that better.

Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,

IDG.nl
Melvyn Sopacua
Webmaster

(Continue reading)

noreply | 3 Jun 2002 03:34
Picon

PHP Test results

array (
  'user_name' => '',
  'email' => '',
  'package' => '4.2.1RC2',
  'testcase' => '0',
  'status' => 'Good',
  'os' => 'Linux i386',
  'sapi' => 'cli',
  'automake' => '1.4',
  'autoconf' => '2.1.3',
  'libtool' => '1.4.0',
  'bison' => '1.2.8',
  'test' => '',
  'problems' => '',
  'bugids' => '',
  'remarks' => '',
)

--

-- 
PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Manuel Lemos | 3 Jun 2002 05:11
Picon
Favicon

Re: Mail bug..

Hello,

On 06/02/2002 09:52 AM, Liz wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> I posted on the bugs thing a problem I have found with 4.2 mail
> function.. Bug #17541.  Where, to summarise if you did 
> 
> mail ("me <at> myhost.com","test","test","To: MyName <me <at> myhost.com>")
> 
> which would normally result in a nice test mail with the To: address
> showing as the last part, actually comes back as me <at> myhost.com;MyName
> <me <at> myhost.com> - ie, duplicating the extras part.
> 
> I've had to roll back to 4.1.2 (where it last worked fine) as the system
> Ive been writing is going company wide and I want to show them that PHP
> rocks, not that it has a silly bug in it.. It could of course, also have
> other implications. Depending on exactly why its working that way.

Windows mail() implementation needs work because it relies on SMTP 
client code built by PHP developer to work similarly to Unix sendmail 
API and it ise not easy to make it work right.

While that does not happen, you may want to try this SMTP client class 
in PHP along with this other MIME messages composing and sending class:

http://www.phpclasses.org/smtpclass
http://www.phpclasses.org/mimemessage
--

-- 

(Continue reading)


Gmane