Re: [PEPr] Comment on HTML::HTML_Template
Jacopo Nuzzi <jacoz <at> php.net>
2010-02-01 17:00:35 GMT
Yes, well... this is a good question.
I think that there's no answer... i think that this is a good template
engine, it is quite fast, it doesn't make the same stuff when is not
necessary and it has some nice features.
This template engine is not even a beta... it is just an alpha and it
should be improved, but is a good start point!
Smarty is a GREAT template engine, but currently, is not part of pear,
and I think that in pear a powerful template engine is missing.
HTML_Template currently, may be is not the best... but I could become
with the help of the pear community.
I'm the only one developer and I'm not doing this 24/7 !
Furthermore, pear is a great place where you can get a great code, and
edit it, replace it and improve it...
How ever, thanks for your attention :)
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Michael Gauthier <mike <at> silverorange.com> wrote:
> Typically, you would include your consts in the relevant class, instead of
> putting them all in a separate class.
> The most important thing for this proposal is to outline what features
> this template engine has compared to other template engines; why would I
> use this instead of Smarty?