headers
till | 2 Jan 2010 11:11
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Image_QRCode package

Hey,

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Michael Gauthier <mike <at> silverorange.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 14:08 +0000, Rich Sage wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Re. Image_QRCode package proposal - the vote result indicated the package
>> was accepted, but I'm aware that there were a couple of conditional votes
>> based on adding tests and some refactoring.  I've now added some tests and
>> refactored the main method in the class, but I'd like to get "approval" from
>> pear-dev before I proceed with the process of adding the package to PEAR.
>>
>> The code, as per the original proposal, is at
>> http://code.google.com/p/pearqrcode - I'd be grateful if any of you had some
>> time to just review this before I continue!
>>
> Hi Rich,
>
> Sorry I didn't have time to review the code earlier during the vote.
> I've had a look over your revised version and it looks good to me.
> You've addressed pretty much all of the conditions requested by Till and
> Bill.

+1 ;-)

> Changing the set*() methods to return $this as suggested by Till would
> still be nice, but for now I'd say go ahead and create the proper PEAR
> package. You've certainly shown that you considered and understood the
> feedback during the voting process.
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Michael Gauthier | 2 Jan 2010 16:42
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: SVN account request

On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 22:24 +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> 2009/12/28 Sérgio Carvalho <sergiosgc <at> gmail.com>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is pear-group <at> php.net a dead address? I've sent a request for SVN karma
> > to pear-group twice during the last two weeks, with no answer whatsoever.
> > If the address is dead, where should such requests be sent to?.
> >
> > The original message follows. Thanks in advance for any help.
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Sérgio Carvalho
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have tried commiting to XML_RPC2 on svn.php.net, and it looks like my
> > account is not setup. Can you look into it? I am lead on XML_RPC2, with
> > username sergiosgc. The svn error follows:
> >
> > svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> > svn: MKACTIVITY of '/repository/!
> > svn/act/17caa46c-f222-4250-a616-455353bf2153': authorization failed:
> > Could not authenticate to server: rejected Digest challenge
> > (http://svn.php.net)
> 
> Your SVN account is enabled and you have karma for pear/packages,
> pear/peardoc and pear2.
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Michael Gauthier | 2 Jan 2010 16:46
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Are you waiting for Mail stable release?

On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 10:00 -0800, Bill Shupp wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2009, at 2:50 AM, A.L.E.C wrote:
> 
> > A.L.E.C wrote:
> >> Hi! I'm a new Mail_Mime developer. I would like to handle Mail package stable release (1.2.0) which is
waiting for so long. I see two bugs in bugtrucker. I like to fix them first. Please, give me access to Mail
package repository.
> > 
> > I have no answer from Mail's leader also. There's my simple patch in #13659. After that fix I think we could
make stable Mail-1.2.0 release. Someone will help me with this?
> > I need also:
> > - peardoc karma
> > - lead in Mail_Mime
> > Thx.
> 
> Alec,
> 
> I've added you as a lead on Mail_Mime.  I'm not sure how to grant peardoc karma, I'll figure that out from
someone else on the PEAR Group.  It looks like you already have SVN access to Mail_Mime, so you should be good
to go on releasing this package.
A.L.E.C.,

As a followup to this, it looks like you've been given peardoc SVN karma
as well. Thanks for your work on Mail_Mime.

Happy New Year,

Mike

--

--
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Rich Sage | 2 Jan 2010 20:28
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Image_QRCode package

Hi Mike, Till,

That's great - thanks for the confirmation - I'll go ahead :-) Happy new
year!

Rich

On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 10:11 AM, till <klimpong <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Michael Gauthier <mike <at> silverorange.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 14:08 +0000, Rich Sage wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Re. Image_QRCode package proposal - the vote result indicated the
> package
> >> was accepted, but I'm aware that there were a couple of conditional
> votes
> >> based on adding tests and some refactoring.  I've now added some tests
> and
> >> refactored the main method in the class, but I'd like to get "approval"
> from
> >> pear-dev before I proceed with the process of adding the package to
> PEAR.
> >>
> >> The code, as per the original proposal, is at
> >> http://code.google.com/p/pearqrcode - I'd be grateful if any of you had
> some
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
mohamed khattary | 3 Jan 2010 17:12
Picon

demand for registration

Hello
I wander the following when I try to register in your site "pear.php.net":
We can not allow you to continue since your IP has been marked suspicious
within the past 30 days by the http://projecthoneypot.org/, if that was done
in error then please contact pear-dev <at> lists.php.net as well as the
projecthoneypot people to resolve the issue

 please I need this registration to be able to ask questions about the
package MDB2
And thank you in advance
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson | 3 Jan 2010 23:04
Picon
Gravatar

Re: demand for registration

Hi,

You do not have to register to ask a question, you can send questions to pear-general <at> lists.php.net

- Helgi

On 3 Jan 2010, at 16:12, mohamed khattary wrote:

> Hello
> I wander the following when I try to register in your site "pear.php.net":
> We can not allow you to continue since your IP has been marked suspicious
> within the past 30 days by the http://projecthoneypot.org/, if that was done
> in error then please contact pear-dev <at> lists.php.net as well as the
> projecthoneypot people to resolve the issue
> 
> please I need this registration to be able to ask questions about the
> package MDB2
> And thank you in advance

--

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson | 4 Jan 2010 10:04
Picon
Gravatar

Re: PEAR Internationalization Package

Hi,

It would be alright for my part but since I haven't been particularly active I would like to leave that up to
the people on the pear development mailing list (list CC'ed).
They will asses and come back to you, and potentially assign a mentor to you that would be able to provide
guidance around PEAR.

From the top of my head, the first step would be to point to other open source contributions, if any, for them
to better assist you.

All the best,
Helgi

On 4 Jan 2010, at 08:55, Stelian Mocanita wrote:

> Hello Helgi,
> 
> I picked up your e-mail address from the PEAR Page so as you can imagine the inquiry is about a pear package. I
was looking over the I18Nv2 package and saw that at this point is not maintained by anybody and that
contributors are welcome, so I would like to give in a hand if possible.
> 
> Some things about me: I am a web developer from Romania, mostly doing PHP lately (3 years or so) but
fraternized with most of the web technologies out there. The reason I stopped at PHP is mainly the
community and one of the new year's resolution is to start giving back. Two thinkgs I am keen about in Web in
general and PHP in particular as Security and Web Accesibility.
> 
> Looking forward to hearing from you and I wish you all the best for the upcoming year.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Stelian
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Stelian Mocanita | 4 Jan 2010 10:09
Picon
Gravatar

Re: PEAR Internationalization Package

Hi,

Unfortunately this would be the first step into the Open Source (as a
contributor) so I don't have any contributions up to this point. I would
like to start here and make my way to the parts where an extra hand is
needed. I hope you guys will give me a chance to prove that I mean bussines
and that I do want to give a bit back.

Regards, Stelian

2010/1/4 Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson <helgith <at> gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> It would be alright for my part but since I haven't been particularly
> active I would like to leave that up to the people on the pear development
> mailing list (list CC'ed).
> They will asses and come back to you, and potentially assign a mentor to
> you that would be able to provide guidance around PEAR.
>
> From the top of my head, the first step would be to point to other open
> source contributions, if any, for them to better assist you.
>
> All the best,
> Helgi
>
> On 4 Jan 2010, at 08:55, Stelian Mocanita wrote:
>
> > Hello Helgi,
> >
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Kendall Phipps | 4 Jan 2010 13:05

Spam: Re: Looking for lists?


Use our lists to get a successful campaign going.

Drop me a line here for more info & samples: 

Spesial Package 395.00  

Complete Physician Database  788,114 in total * 17,482 emails 
Coverage in many different areas of medicine such as Endocrinology, 
Pathology, Urology, Neurology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry, Cardiology and much more 

====Get These Below with every order this week ====

7145 Hospitals*23,000 Administrators with Ph/fax and postal address. 

Licensed Clinic/Dentist 597,959 Total Records*6,494 Emails*6,000 Fax Numbers. 

US Pharmaceutical Company 47,000 employees in high-ranking positions 
   Executive's Directory Names and email addresses of 

Chiropractors*108,421 with phone, 3,414 emails and 6,553 fax numbers. 

Acupuncture Database 23,988 records 1,826 emails 

Alternative Medicine Clinics and Practitioners Database 
   There are 1,141,602 total records with 29,320 emails and 38.935 fax numbers. 

send and email to: Flossie <at> listmastersmd.nom.es.

Good until the end of this week.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Michael Gauthier | 4 Jan 2010 19:06
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Image_Canvas: How to correct font-size with bc-breakage in mind

On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 03:04 +0100, Stefan Neufeind, PEAR wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> it turns out that during creation of the Image_Canvas-package one thing
> was overlooked: Since GD2 (which I suspect most people use nowadays) the
> TTF-functions use a font-size with points instead of pixels. And yes,
> that makes quite some difference :-)
> 
> In the API (phpdoc) it's documented that the font-size is given in
> pixels. So actually according to the API-doc a correction-factor is
> needed for TTF-functions for everything using Image_Canvas with GD2.
> 
> However on the other hand one might possibly assume that quite a number
> of people used it with GD as their canvas-type. So the other way of
> "getting it right" might also be to correct the API-docs to say "points"
> instead of "pixels" and fix the other output-drivers (e.g. SVG).
> 
> Either way BC needs to be broken to get it (some sort of) correct and
> consistent, allowing to switch from GD-output to e.g. SVG-output without
> too much difference. (Note that anyhow there will be some difference in
> calculation of a font-size etc.).
> 
> 
> Please let me know what you think. I'll do my best to take them into
> account and make a "wise" decision for the BC-breakage. *sigh*
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
>  Stefan
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane